The Swiss Endometriosis Database: a retrospective multicentre cohort study on pain levels and multimodal treatment needs of endometriosis patients.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sara Imboden, Selina Lang, Antonalla Martino, Peter Martin Fehr, Lea Duempelmann, Cloé Vaineau, Heike Willi, Nicolas Samartzis, Simone Kamm, Dimitri Sarlos, Stephanie Verta, Tina Rohrbach, Christian Polli, Alexandra Kochanowski, Michael Mueller
{"title":"The Swiss Endometriosis Database: a retrospective multicentre cohort study on pain levels and multimodal treatment needs of endometriosis patients.","authors":"Sara Imboden, Selina Lang, Antonalla Martino, Peter Martin Fehr, Lea Duempelmann, Cloé Vaineau, Heike Willi, Nicolas Samartzis, Simone Kamm, Dimitri Sarlos, Stephanie Verta, Tina Rohrbach, Christian Polli, Alexandra Kochanowski, Michael Mueller","doi":"10.57187/s.3854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study aims: </strong>This study aimed to deepen the understanding of endometriosis symptoms, types, and therapy recommendations for Swiss endometriosis patients in Swiss-certified endometriosis centres in 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this exploratory retrospective multicentre cohort study, data from 3538 women who had their first consultation at a certified endometriosis centre in Switzerland in 2022 were analysed retrospectively. Data were collected by using questionnaires that were filled out by the patient and the physician at the first consultation, to evaluate parameters that included the main reason for consultation, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain, clinical findings and therapy recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study analysed all patients who had provided consent and were diagnosed with endometriosis (n = 3403, 96.2%) during their first consultation at a Swiss-certified endometriosis centre in 2022. The median age was 33.0 years (11-66 years). Of 812 documented VAS scores, 71.6% of the patients felt general pain, resulting in a median VAS score for dysmenorrhoea of 8 (0-10). After the first examination, peritoneal endometriosis (n = 1453, 54.8%) was diagnosed most often, followed by adenomyosis (n = 1366, 51.5%), deep infiltrating endometriosis (n = 857, 32.3%) and cystic/ovarian endometriosis (n = 643, 24.2%). In 46.2% of the patients, more than one working hypothesis, with regard to their condition, was identified - in most cases, a combination of peritoneal endometriosis and adenomyosis (15.6%). Endocrine therapy was the most frequent treatment recommended (60.6%), followed by recommendations for medical pain therapy (57%), surgery (34.4%), complementary procedures (23.5%), reproductive therapy (5.7%) and multimodal pain therapy (5.6%). Analysis of correlations between symptoms, diagnosis and treatment recommendations showed only a few notable findings such as correlations between peritoneal endometriosis and hormonal-/medical treatment as well as correlations between deep infiltrating endometriosis and treatment recommendation for surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high VAS scores in dysmenorrhoea underline the degree of suffering of patients with endometriosis seeking consultation at a certified endometriosis centre. Most patients presented multiple phenotypes with uncorrelated symptoms and diverse as well as multimodal treatment options were indicated, underlining the complexity and individuality of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"155 ","pages":"3854"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study aims: This study aimed to deepen the understanding of endometriosis symptoms, types, and therapy recommendations for Swiss endometriosis patients in Swiss-certified endometriosis centres in 2022.

Methods: In this exploratory retrospective multicentre cohort study, data from 3538 women who had their first consultation at a certified endometriosis centre in Switzerland in 2022 were analysed retrospectively. Data were collected by using questionnaires that were filled out by the patient and the physician at the first consultation, to evaluate parameters that included the main reason for consultation, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain, clinical findings and therapy recommendations.

Results: This study analysed all patients who had provided consent and were diagnosed with endometriosis (n = 3403, 96.2%) during their first consultation at a Swiss-certified endometriosis centre in 2022. The median age was 33.0 years (11-66 years). Of 812 documented VAS scores, 71.6% of the patients felt general pain, resulting in a median VAS score for dysmenorrhoea of 8 (0-10). After the first examination, peritoneal endometriosis (n = 1453, 54.8%) was diagnosed most often, followed by adenomyosis (n = 1366, 51.5%), deep infiltrating endometriosis (n = 857, 32.3%) and cystic/ovarian endometriosis (n = 643, 24.2%). In 46.2% of the patients, more than one working hypothesis, with regard to their condition, was identified - in most cases, a combination of peritoneal endometriosis and adenomyosis (15.6%). Endocrine therapy was the most frequent treatment recommended (60.6%), followed by recommendations for medical pain therapy (57%), surgery (34.4%), complementary procedures (23.5%), reproductive therapy (5.7%) and multimodal pain therapy (5.6%). Analysis of correlations between symptoms, diagnosis and treatment recommendations showed only a few notable findings such as correlations between peritoneal endometriosis and hormonal-/medical treatment as well as correlations between deep infiltrating endometriosis and treatment recommendation for surgery.

Conclusion: The high VAS scores in dysmenorrhoea underline the degree of suffering of patients with endometriosis seeking consultation at a certified endometriosis centre. Most patients presented multiple phenotypes with uncorrelated symptoms and diverse as well as multimodal treatment options were indicated, underlining the complexity and individuality of the disease.

瑞士子宫内膜异位症数据库:一项关于子宫内膜异位症患者疼痛水平和多模式治疗需求的回顾性多中心队列研究。
研究目的:本研究旨在加深对2022年在瑞士认证的子宫内膜异位症中心的瑞士子宫内膜异位症患者的症状、类型和治疗建议的理解。方法:在这项探索性回顾性多中心队列研究中,对2022年在瑞士一家经认证的子宫内膜异位症中心首次就诊的3538名妇女的数据进行回顾性分析。数据通过患者和医生在第一次咨询时填写的问卷收集,评估参数包括咨询的主要原因、疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、临床表现和治疗建议。结果:本研究分析了2022年在瑞士认证的子宫内膜异位症中心首次咨询时同意并诊断为子宫内膜异位症的所有患者(n = 3403, 96.2%)。中位年龄为33.0岁(11-66岁)。在812个记录的VAS评分中,71.6%的患者感到全身疼痛,导致痛经的VAS评分中位数为8(0-10)。首次检查后诊断最多的是腹膜性子宫内膜异位症(n = 1453, 54.8%),其次是bb0 (n = 1366, 51.5%)、深浸润性子宫内膜异位症(n = 857, 32.3%)和囊性/卵巢子宫内膜异位症(n = 643, 24.2%)。在46.2%的患者中,确定了不止一种关于其病情的工作假设-在大多数情况下,腹膜子宫内膜异位症和bb0的组合(15.6%)。内分泌治疗是推荐的最常见的治疗方法(60.6%),其次是药物疼痛治疗(57%),手术(34.4%),补充手术(23.5%),生殖治疗(5.7%)和多模式疼痛治疗(5.6%)。对症状、诊断和治疗建议之间的相关性分析仅显示了一些值得注意的发现,如腹膜子宫内膜异位症与激素/药物治疗之间的相关性以及深浸润性子宫内膜异位症与手术治疗建议之间的相关性。结论:痛经患者的VAS评分较高,反映了子宫内膜异位症患者在经认证的子宫内膜异位症中心就诊时的痛苦程度。大多数患者表现出多种表型,症状不相关,并指出了多种治疗方案,强调了疾病的复杂性和个体化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信