Filling the sustainability gap: what beef industry stakeholders can learn from ranchers on new practice adoption, grazing management plans, and sustainability.

IF 1.8 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2025-04-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txaf045
S C Klopatek, A M Cantwell, L Roche, J W Oltjen
{"title":"Filling the sustainability gap: what beef industry stakeholders can learn from ranchers on new practice adoption, grazing management plans, and sustainability.","authors":"S C Klopatek, A M Cantwell, L Roche, J W Oltjen","doi":"10.1093/tas/txaf045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Livestock's environmental footprint has become a pivotal concern for consumers and food corporations alike. To stay competitive in the sustainable foods movement and reduce Scope 3 emissions, the beef industry has sought to improve sustainability within their own value chains. However, before system sustainability can be achieved, sustainability practices must be adopted and implemented by the foundation of the beef system, cow-calf operations. Therefore, to gain insight into ranchers' motivations for adopting new sustainable practices we administered an online multi-state survey to cattle ranchers in collaboration with state cattlemen's associations. The survey objectives were to: 1) identify where ranchers obtain educational information, 2) identify ranching priorities and reasons for new practice adoption, 3) determine factors influencing grazing management plan adoption, and 4) assess what sustainability means to the ranching community. Of the survey participants who fully completed the survey (n=706), when asked what made them trust in a ranching educational program, 64% of ranchers selected science, 55% selected programs partnered with cattlemen associations, and 32% trusted the program if other ranchers they knew were enrolled in the program. Increased profitability (79%), animal health (78%), and expected benefits would outweigh costs (51%) were key drivers for ranchers adopting a new practice. A top priority/principal concern for ranchers was improving ranch public image (n= 551), likely influenced by public rhetoric and concerns around beef's environmental impact. In terms of grazing management plans, 77% of producers stated they had a grazing management plan and 38% of ranchers indicated their plan was written. The likelihood of having a grazing management plan increased with rancher age, presence of a succession plan, and participation in a land assistantship program (<i>P</i> < 0.01). In total, 114 survey participants answered the open-ended question, \"What does sustainable ranching mean to you.\" Based on responses, ranchers' definition of sustainability was a multifaceted concept balancing environmental health, profitability, family, and animal welfare, with many viewing these elements as interconnected and critical for the future of their operations. In conclusion, the information accrued in this survey provided guidance to beef industry stakeholders on how to effectively engage ranchers and encourage the broader adoption of sustainable management practices and programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"9 ","pages":"txaf045"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12199235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Livestock's environmental footprint has become a pivotal concern for consumers and food corporations alike. To stay competitive in the sustainable foods movement and reduce Scope 3 emissions, the beef industry has sought to improve sustainability within their own value chains. However, before system sustainability can be achieved, sustainability practices must be adopted and implemented by the foundation of the beef system, cow-calf operations. Therefore, to gain insight into ranchers' motivations for adopting new sustainable practices we administered an online multi-state survey to cattle ranchers in collaboration with state cattlemen's associations. The survey objectives were to: 1) identify where ranchers obtain educational information, 2) identify ranching priorities and reasons for new practice adoption, 3) determine factors influencing grazing management plan adoption, and 4) assess what sustainability means to the ranching community. Of the survey participants who fully completed the survey (n=706), when asked what made them trust in a ranching educational program, 64% of ranchers selected science, 55% selected programs partnered with cattlemen associations, and 32% trusted the program if other ranchers they knew were enrolled in the program. Increased profitability (79%), animal health (78%), and expected benefits would outweigh costs (51%) were key drivers for ranchers adopting a new practice. A top priority/principal concern for ranchers was improving ranch public image (n= 551), likely influenced by public rhetoric and concerns around beef's environmental impact. In terms of grazing management plans, 77% of producers stated they had a grazing management plan and 38% of ranchers indicated their plan was written. The likelihood of having a grazing management plan increased with rancher age, presence of a succession plan, and participation in a land assistantship program (P < 0.01). In total, 114 survey participants answered the open-ended question, "What does sustainable ranching mean to you." Based on responses, ranchers' definition of sustainability was a multifaceted concept balancing environmental health, profitability, family, and animal welfare, with many viewing these elements as interconnected and critical for the future of their operations. In conclusion, the information accrued in this survey provided guidance to beef industry stakeholders on how to effectively engage ranchers and encourage the broader adoption of sustainable management practices and programs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

填补可持续性差距:牛肉行业利益相关者可以从牧场主那里学到的新做法、放牧管理计划和可持续性。
牲畜的环境足迹已经成为消费者和食品公司关注的关键问题。为了在可持续食品运动中保持竞争力并减少范围3的排放,牛肉行业一直在寻求提高自身价值链的可持续性。然而,在实现系统可持续性之前,可持续性实践必须通过牛肉系统的基础,即牛-小牛操作来采用和实施。因此,为了深入了解牧场主采用新的可持续实践的动机,我们与各州牧场主协会合作,对牧场主进行了一项在线多州调查。调查的目标是:1)确定牧场主从哪里获得教育信息,2)确定牧场优先事项和采用新做法的原因,3)确定影响放牧管理计划采用的因素,4)评估可持续性对牧场社区的意义。在完全完成调查的调查参与者(n=706)中,当被问及是什么让他们信任牧场教育计划时,64%的牧场主选择了科学,55%的牧场主选择了与牧场主协会合作的计划,32%的牧场主相信他们认识的其他牧场主参加了该计划。提高盈利能力(79%)、动物健康(78%)和预期收益将超过成本(51%)是牧场主采用新做法的主要驱动因素。牧场主的首要任务/主要关注点是改善牧场的公众形象(n= 551),这可能受到公众言论和对牛肉环境影响的担忧的影响。在放牧管理计划方面,77%的生产者表示他们有放牧管理计划,38%的牧场主表示他们有书面计划。制定放牧管理计划的可能性随着牧场主年龄、接班计划的存在和土地援助计划的参与而增加(P < 0.01)。总共有114名调查参与者回答了这个开放式问题,“可持续牧场对你意味着什么?”根据回应,牧场主对可持续性的定义是一个多方面的概念,平衡了环境健康、盈利能力、家庭和动物福利,许多人认为这些因素相互关联,对他们未来的运营至关重要。总之,本次调查中积累的信息为牛肉行业利益相关者提供了指导,指导他们如何有效地吸引牧场主,并鼓励更广泛地采用可持续管理实践和计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信