Wearable Spine Tracker vs. Video-Based Pose Estimation for Human Activity Recognition.

IF 3.4 3区 综合性期刊 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Sensors Pub Date : 2025-06-18 DOI:10.3390/s25123806
Jonas Walkling, Luca Sander, Arwed Masch, Thomas M Deserno
{"title":"Wearable Spine Tracker vs. Video-Based Pose Estimation for Human Activity Recognition.","authors":"Jonas Walkling, Luca Sander, Arwed Masch, Thomas M Deserno","doi":"10.3390/s25123806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper presents a comparative study for detecting the activities of daily living (ADLs) using two distinct sensor systems: the FlexTail wearable spine tracker and a camera-based pose estimation model. We developed a protocol to simultaneously record data with both systems and capture eleven activities from general movement, household, and food handling. We tested a comprehensive selection of state-of-the-art time series classification algorithms. Both systems achieved high classification performance, with average F1 scores of 0.90 for both datasets using a 1-second time window and the random dilated shapelet transform (RDST) and QUANT classifier for FlexTail and camera data, respectively. We also explored the impact of hierarchical activity grouping and found that while it improved classification performance in some cases, the benefits were not consistent across all activities. Our findings suggest that both sensor systems recognize ADLs. The FlexTail model performs better for detecting sitting and transitions, like standing up, while the camera-based model is better for activities that involve arm and hand movements.</p>","PeriodicalId":21698,"journal":{"name":"Sensors","volume":"25 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/s25123806","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study for detecting the activities of daily living (ADLs) using two distinct sensor systems: the FlexTail wearable spine tracker and a camera-based pose estimation model. We developed a protocol to simultaneously record data with both systems and capture eleven activities from general movement, household, and food handling. We tested a comprehensive selection of state-of-the-art time series classification algorithms. Both systems achieved high classification performance, with average F1 scores of 0.90 for both datasets using a 1-second time window and the random dilated shapelet transform (RDST) and QUANT classifier for FlexTail and camera data, respectively. We also explored the impact of hierarchical activity grouping and found that while it improved classification performance in some cases, the benefits were not consistent across all activities. Our findings suggest that both sensor systems recognize ADLs. The FlexTail model performs better for detecting sitting and transitions, like standing up, while the camera-based model is better for activities that involve arm and hand movements.

可穿戴脊柱跟踪器与基于视频的人体活动识别姿势估计。
本文介绍了使用两种不同的传感器系统检测日常生活活动(adl)的比较研究:FlexTail可穿戴脊柱跟踪器和基于相机的姿势估计模型。我们开发了一种协议,可以同时记录两个系统的数据,并从一般运动、家庭和食物处理中捕获11种活动。我们测试了一系列最先进的时间序列分类算法。这两个系统都取得了很高的分类性能,在FlexTail和相机数据中,使用1秒时间窗口和随机扩展形状变换(RDST)和QUANT分类器,两个数据集的平均F1分数分别为0.90。我们还探讨了分层活动分组的影响,发现虽然它在某些情况下提高了分类性能,但其好处并不是在所有活动中都一致的。我们的研究结果表明,这两种传感器系统都可以识别adl。FlexTail模型在检测坐姿和姿势转换(比如站起来)方面表现更好,而基于摄像头的模型在检测涉及手臂和手部运动的活动方面表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sensors
Sensors 工程技术-电化学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
8430
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of sensors and biosensors. It publishes reviews (including comprehensive reviews on the complete sensors products), regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信