Katinka Albrecht, Wiebke Troll, Johanna Callhoff, Anja Strangfeld, Sarah Ohrndorf, Johanna Mucke
{"title":"Sex- and gender-related differences in systemic lupus erythematosus: a scoping review.","authors":"Katinka Albrecht, Wiebke Troll, Johanna Callhoff, Anja Strangfeld, Sarah Ohrndorf, Johanna Mucke","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05910-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A scoping review was conducted to compile evidence on sex-specific differences in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with focus on autoantibodies, organ manifestation, damage, treatment and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Systematic searches in PubMed and Cochrane were performed including meta-analyses, observational studies and clinical trials from 01/2015 to 11/2024. Studies of adults with SLE reporting outcomes by sex were eligible. The research protocol is registered in the Registry for Scoping Reviews (OSF, https://osf.io/gfbs9 ). From 373 screened articles, 81 publications were included. Studies comprised differences in autoantibodies (n = 13), damage (n = 40), organ involvement (n = 27), treatment (n = 14), and PROs (n = 6). Twenty studies compared proportions of outcomes by sex with patient numbers ranging from 98 to 11,943. The female/male ratio was between 4:1 and 11:1. The review found a higher age at onset in men and a higher proportion of positive lupus anticoagulant, nephritis, serositis, antiphospholipid syndrome, greater renal and cardiovascular damage and severe infections. SLE in women more often presented with Ro/SSA autoantibodies, alopecia, photosensitivity, Raynaud, and osteoporosis. Some studies showed more frequent cyclophosphamide and less frequent antimalarials in men. Little evidence indicated more frequent non-adherence with azathioprine and mycophenolate in women. Limited evidence was available for PROs. This review confirms significant sex differences in SLE, with men showing later onset, more severe organ damage, and distinct autoantibody and treatment patterns, while women more often present with Ro/SSA autoantibodies, photosensitivity, and osteoporosis. Evidence on patient-reported outcomes remains limited, highlighting the need for further research to guide sex-specific management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 7","pages":"160"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05910-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A scoping review was conducted to compile evidence on sex-specific differences in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with focus on autoantibodies, organ manifestation, damage, treatment and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Systematic searches in PubMed and Cochrane were performed including meta-analyses, observational studies and clinical trials from 01/2015 to 11/2024. Studies of adults with SLE reporting outcomes by sex were eligible. The research protocol is registered in the Registry for Scoping Reviews (OSF, https://osf.io/gfbs9 ). From 373 screened articles, 81 publications were included. Studies comprised differences in autoantibodies (n = 13), damage (n = 40), organ involvement (n = 27), treatment (n = 14), and PROs (n = 6). Twenty studies compared proportions of outcomes by sex with patient numbers ranging from 98 to 11,943. The female/male ratio was between 4:1 and 11:1. The review found a higher age at onset in men and a higher proportion of positive lupus anticoagulant, nephritis, serositis, antiphospholipid syndrome, greater renal and cardiovascular damage and severe infections. SLE in women more often presented with Ro/SSA autoantibodies, alopecia, photosensitivity, Raynaud, and osteoporosis. Some studies showed more frequent cyclophosphamide and less frequent antimalarials in men. Little evidence indicated more frequent non-adherence with azathioprine and mycophenolate in women. Limited evidence was available for PROs. This review confirms significant sex differences in SLE, with men showing later onset, more severe organ damage, and distinct autoantibody and treatment patterns, while women more often present with Ro/SSA autoantibodies, photosensitivity, and osteoporosis. Evidence on patient-reported outcomes remains limited, highlighting the need for further research to guide sex-specific management.
期刊介绍:
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.