Unlocking resilience in the face of user aggression: Preliminary psychometric evaluation of the Italian Trauma-related Coping Self-Efficacy Scale among hospital health care professionals.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Valentina Sommovigo, Elena Cavallari, Ilaria Setti
{"title":"Unlocking resilience in the face of user aggression: Preliminary psychometric evaluation of the Italian Trauma-related Coping Self-Efficacy Scale among hospital health care professionals.","authors":"Valentina Sommovigo, Elena Cavallari, Ilaria Setti","doi":"10.1037/tra0001976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aggression toward health care workers is a growing global concern, contributing to psychological distress and posttraumatic stress symptoms. Trauma-related coping self-efficacy (CSE) is critical in mitigating such effects and promoting psychological resilience after traumatic events. However, Italian health care settings lack a validated tool to measure CSE. This study aimed to preliminarily validate an Italian version of the Trauma-Related CSE Scale, adapted to measure health care workers' responses to verbal and physical aggression from patients or clients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study involved 1,999 health care professionals who faced verbal aggression (92.6%) or physical aggression (7.4%) from patients or clients. The sample was primarily consisting of female nurses, with an average age of 46.95 years and a mean job tenure of 20 years. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: one for exploratory factor analysis (EFA; <i>n</i> = 996) and another for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; <i>n</i> = 1,003). The scale's factorial structure was evaluated through EFA and CFA, with additional analyses for reliability, measurement invariance, and both nomological and concurrent validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EFA supported a unidimensional six-item structure, which was confirmed by CFA and demonstrated strong reliability. Full residual invariance was observed across health care professionals aged below and above 50 years. Higher CSE was negatively correlated with burnout and posttraumatic stress symptoms while positively associated with job satisfaction and emotional regulatory self-efficacy. Nurses reported lower CSE than doctors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offers a context-specific tool for assessing CSE in hospital health care settings, which can aid organizations in implementing practices to strengthen workers' resilience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001976","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aggression toward health care workers is a growing global concern, contributing to psychological distress and posttraumatic stress symptoms. Trauma-related coping self-efficacy (CSE) is critical in mitigating such effects and promoting psychological resilience after traumatic events. However, Italian health care settings lack a validated tool to measure CSE. This study aimed to preliminarily validate an Italian version of the Trauma-Related CSE Scale, adapted to measure health care workers' responses to verbal and physical aggression from patients or clients.

Method: The study involved 1,999 health care professionals who faced verbal aggression (92.6%) or physical aggression (7.4%) from patients or clients. The sample was primarily consisting of female nurses, with an average age of 46.95 years and a mean job tenure of 20 years. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: one for exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 996) and another for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 1,003). The scale's factorial structure was evaluated through EFA and CFA, with additional analyses for reliability, measurement invariance, and both nomological and concurrent validity.

Results: EFA supported a unidimensional six-item structure, which was confirmed by CFA and demonstrated strong reliability. Full residual invariance was observed across health care professionals aged below and above 50 years. Higher CSE was negatively correlated with burnout and posttraumatic stress symptoms while positively associated with job satisfaction and emotional regulatory self-efficacy. Nurses reported lower CSE than doctors.

Conclusions: This study offers a context-specific tool for assessing CSE in hospital health care settings, which can aid organizations in implementing practices to strengthen workers' resilience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

面对用户攻击释放弹性:意大利创伤相关应对自我效能量表在医院医护人员中的初步心理测量评估。
目的:对卫生保健工作者的攻击是一个日益受到全球关注的问题,导致心理困扰和创伤后应激症状。创伤相关应对自我效能(CSE)在减轻创伤事件后的影响和促进心理弹性方面至关重要。然而,意大利卫生保健机构缺乏有效的工具来衡量CSE。本研究旨在初步验证意大利版创伤相关CSE量表,该量表适用于测量卫生保健工作者对来自患者或客户的言语和身体攻击的反应。方法:对1999名面临患者或来访者言语攻击(92.6%)或肢体攻击(7.4%)的卫生保健专业人员进行研究。样本以女护士为主,平均年龄46.95岁,平均工作年限20年。参与者随机分为两组:一组进行探索性因素分析(EFA);n = 996),另一个用于验证性因子分析(CFA;N = 1003)。量表的因子结构通过EFA和CFA进行评估,并对信度、测量不变性、法效度和并发效度进行了额外的分析。结果:EFA支持单维六项结构,经CFA验证,具有较强的信度。在50岁以下和50岁以上的卫生保健专业人员中观察到完全残差不变性。高CSE与职业倦怠和创伤后应激症状呈负相关,与工作满意度和情绪调节自我效能感呈正相关。护士报告的CSE低于医生。结论:本研究为评估医院卫生保健环境中的CSE提供了一个具体的工具,可以帮助组织实施实践,以加强工人的弹性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信