Association of Pelvic Structure Involvement and Tumor Morphology at MRI with Prognosis Following Resection in Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer.

IF 5.6 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Davy M J Creemers, Henrik Iversen, Evi Banken, Floor Piqeur, Stijn H J Ketelaers, Alette Daniëls-Gooszen, Gabriella J Palmer, Torbjörn Holm, Harm Rutten, Chikako Suzuki, Jacobus W A Burger, Anna Martling, Joost Nederend
{"title":"Association of Pelvic Structure Involvement and Tumor Morphology at MRI with Prognosis Following Resection in Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer.","authors":"Davy M J Creemers, Henrik Iversen, Evi Banken, Floor Piqeur, Stijn H J Ketelaers, Alette Daniëls-Gooszen, Gabriella J Palmer, Torbjörn Holm, Harm Rutten, Chikako Suzuki, Jacobus W A Burger, Anna Martling, Joost Nederend","doi":"10.1148/rycan.240246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To determine the influence of location, extent of tissue invasion, and tumor morphology at MRI on the resectability of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) and postresection oncologic outcomes of LRRC. Materials and Methods This retrospective observational study included consecutive patients diagnosed with LRRC who underwent surgery with curative intent at the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven and Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm between January 2003 and December 2017. Two expert radiologists reviewed available MR images while adhering to a standardized reviewing checklist. The effect of pelvic structure involvement, tumor morphology on the primary outcome of resection margin status, and secondary outcomes of overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analyses. Results The final analysis included 328 patients with LRRC (mean age ± SD, 64.9 years ± 9.6; 126 female, 202 male). Resection margins were negative in 217 (66.2%) patients and positive in 111 patients (33.8%). Tumor size, tumor type, and border type on MR images were all associated with resectability. Central recurrences were associated with the lowest likelihood of positive resection margins (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.71; <i>P</i> < .001), whereas lateral recurrences were associated with the highest likelihood (OR, 2.00; 95% CI: 1.25, 3.19: <i>P</i> = .004). Similarly, central recurrences were associated with better disease-free survival compared with lateral recurrences (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.90; <i>P</i> = .006 vs HR, 1.49; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.94; <i>P</i> = .003, respectively). Similar findings were observed after correcting for resection margin status. Conclusion Standardized MRI assessment of tumor characteristics in patients with LRRC resulted in the identification of specific prognostic factors. Central compartment involvement and well-defined tumors were associated with improved prognosis, whereas lateral compartment involvement and fibrotic spiculated tumors were associated with a worse prognosis after surgical resection. <b>Keywords:</b> Rectum, MR-Imaging, Abdomen/GI, Oncology, Surgery, Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer, Tumor Biology <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":20786,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","volume":"7 4","pages":"e240246"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.240246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To determine the influence of location, extent of tissue invasion, and tumor morphology at MRI on the resectability of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) and postresection oncologic outcomes of LRRC. Materials and Methods This retrospective observational study included consecutive patients diagnosed with LRRC who underwent surgery with curative intent at the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven and Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm between January 2003 and December 2017. Two expert radiologists reviewed available MR images while adhering to a standardized reviewing checklist. The effect of pelvic structure involvement, tumor morphology on the primary outcome of resection margin status, and secondary outcomes of overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analyses. Results The final analysis included 328 patients with LRRC (mean age ± SD, 64.9 years ± 9.6; 126 female, 202 male). Resection margins were negative in 217 (66.2%) patients and positive in 111 patients (33.8%). Tumor size, tumor type, and border type on MR images were all associated with resectability. Central recurrences were associated with the lowest likelihood of positive resection margins (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.71; P < .001), whereas lateral recurrences were associated with the highest likelihood (OR, 2.00; 95% CI: 1.25, 3.19: P = .004). Similarly, central recurrences were associated with better disease-free survival compared with lateral recurrences (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.90; P = .006 vs HR, 1.49; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.94; P = .003, respectively). Similar findings were observed after correcting for resection margin status. Conclusion Standardized MRI assessment of tumor characteristics in patients with LRRC resulted in the identification of specific prognostic factors. Central compartment involvement and well-defined tumors were associated with improved prognosis, whereas lateral compartment involvement and fibrotic spiculated tumors were associated with a worse prognosis after surgical resection. Keywords: Rectum, MR-Imaging, Abdomen/GI, Oncology, Surgery, Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer, Tumor Biology Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2025.

局部复发直肠癌切除术后盆腔结构受累及MRI肿瘤形态与预后的关系。
目的探讨局部复发直肠癌(LRRC)的部位、组织浸润程度和肿瘤MRI形态对其可切除性及术后肿瘤预后的影响。本回顾性观察性研究纳入了2003年1月至2017年12月期间在埃因霍温Catharina医院和斯德哥尔摩卡罗林斯卡大学医院连续接受手术治疗的LRRC患者。两名放射科专家在遵循标准化检查清单的同时审查了可用的MR图像。采用单变量和多变量logistic回归及Cox比例风险分析评估盆腔结构受损伤、肿瘤形态对切除边缘状态的主要结局、总生存期和无病生存期的次要结局的影响。结果最终纳入328例LRRC患者(平均年龄±SD, 64.9岁±9.6岁;126名女性,202名男性)。切缘阴性217例(66.2%),阳性111例(33.8%)。MR图像上肿瘤大小、肿瘤类型和边界类型均与可切除性相关。中枢性复发与切除边缘阳性的可能性最低相关(优势比[OR], 0.45;95% ci: 0.28, 0.71;P < 0.001),而外侧复发与最高可能性相关(OR, 2.00;95% ci: 1.25, 3.19: p = 0.004)。同样,与外侧复发相比,中心复发与更好的无病生存相关(风险比[HR], 0.69;95% ci: 0.53, 0.90;P = 0.006 vs HR, 1.49;95% ci: 1.14, 1.94;P = 0.003)。在纠正切除边缘状态后观察到类似的结果。结论对LRRC患者肿瘤特征进行标准化的MRI评估,可识别特定的预后因素。中央室受累和肿瘤界限明确与预后改善相关,而外侧室受累和纤维性针状肿瘤与手术切除后预后较差相关。关键词:直肠,磁共振成像,腹部/胃肠道,肿瘤学,外科,局部复发性直肠癌,肿瘤生物学©rsna, 2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信