Effects of two commonly and limited used chemosterilants on Lucilia sericata egg surface sterilization.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PARASITOLOGY
Nevra Polat, Salih Mollahaliloglu, Murat Koc
{"title":"Effects of two commonly and limited used chemosterilants on Lucilia sericata egg surface sterilization.","authors":"Nevra Polat, Salih Mollahaliloglu, Murat Koc","doi":"10.1007/s00436-025-08515-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maggot therapy (MT) is the most common medical use of sterile fly larvae of Lucilia sericata and other species of the family Calliphoridae as an alternative to surgery and long-term antiseptic therapy in the treatment of deep and infected non-healing wounds. Effective and reliable MT requires an aseptic technique to prevent bacterial infection of the wound. However, due to the habitat of Calliphoridae flies, the outer surface of their eggs is often contaminated with bacteria. In this study, Lucilia sericata eggs were sterilized using two techniques. NaOCI (sodium hypochlorite), which is widely used as a sterilant (Sterilant 1-S1), and Lysol surface disinfectant, which is rarely used (Sterilant 2-S2), and a control (unsterilized) were chosen. Sterilization efficacy, egg survival, and mortality were evaluated comparatively at 0.05, 1, 2, and 3 (%) concentrations and 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-min application times at each concentration, and bacterial growth in the post-sterilization environment was controlled. In the in vitro sterility efficiency and reliability test, no bacterial colonies were found in sterilized eggs transferred to tryptic soy agar (TSA) culture. In contrast, bacterial and fungal growth was detected in unsterilized eggs. Protocol S1 provided effective egg surface sterilization at a concentration of 0.05% with a 1-min exposure time. This treatment resulted in 85.12% survival rate and 14.88% egg mortality. Based on its optimal balance of low mortality, high viability, and effective sterilization, we recommend a 1-min immersion in 0.05% NaOCl solution for sterilization of Lucilia sericata eggs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19968,"journal":{"name":"Parasitology Research","volume":"124 6","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasitology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-025-08515-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maggot therapy (MT) is the most common medical use of sterile fly larvae of Lucilia sericata and other species of the family Calliphoridae as an alternative to surgery and long-term antiseptic therapy in the treatment of deep and infected non-healing wounds. Effective and reliable MT requires an aseptic technique to prevent bacterial infection of the wound. However, due to the habitat of Calliphoridae flies, the outer surface of their eggs is often contaminated with bacteria. In this study, Lucilia sericata eggs were sterilized using two techniques. NaOCI (sodium hypochlorite), which is widely used as a sterilant (Sterilant 1-S1), and Lysol surface disinfectant, which is rarely used (Sterilant 2-S2), and a control (unsterilized) were chosen. Sterilization efficacy, egg survival, and mortality were evaluated comparatively at 0.05, 1, 2, and 3 (%) concentrations and 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-min application times at each concentration, and bacterial growth in the post-sterilization environment was controlled. In the in vitro sterility efficiency and reliability test, no bacterial colonies were found in sterilized eggs transferred to tryptic soy agar (TSA) culture. In contrast, bacterial and fungal growth was detected in unsterilized eggs. Protocol S1 provided effective egg surface sterilization at a concentration of 0.05% with a 1-min exposure time. This treatment resulted in 85.12% survival rate and 14.88% egg mortality. Based on its optimal balance of low mortality, high viability, and effective sterilization, we recommend a 1-min immersion in 0.05% NaOCl solution for sterilization of Lucilia sericata eggs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

两种常用和有限使用的化学灭菌剂对丝光绿蝇卵表面灭菌的影响。
蛆疗法(MT)是最常见的医学用途,是丝光Lucilia sericata和其他Calliphoridae科的不育蝇幼虫,作为手术和长期消毒治疗的替代方案,用于治疗深度和感染的未愈合伤口。有效和可靠的MT需要无菌技术来防止伤口的细菌感染。然而,由于蛱蝶科蝇的栖息地,它们的卵的外表面经常被细菌污染。本研究采用两种技术对丝光露蝇卵进行了绝育。选择广泛使用的灭菌剂NaOCI(次氯酸钠)(灭菌剂1-S1)、很少使用的表面消毒剂来索尔(灭菌剂2-S2)和未消毒的对照。对比评价0.05、1、2、3(%)浓度和各浓度1、2、3、4 min施药时间下的灭菌效果、鸡蛋存活率和死亡率,并控制灭菌后环境中的细菌生长。在体外无菌效率和可靠性试验中,将无菌卵转移到胰蛋白酶琼脂(TSA)培养基中,未发现细菌菌落。相比之下,在未消毒的鸡蛋中检测到细菌和真菌的生长。方案S1提供了有效的鸡蛋表面灭菌,浓度为0.05%,暴露时间为1分钟。卵死亡率14.88%,成活率85.12%。基于低死亡率、高活力和有效灭菌的最佳平衡,我们推荐在0.05% NaOCl溶液中浸泡1 min,用于丝光绿蝇卵的灭菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parasitology Research
Parasitology Research 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal Parasitology Research covers the latest developments in parasitology across a variety of disciplines, including biology, medicine and veterinary medicine. Among many topics discussed are chemotherapy and control of parasitic disease, and the relationship of host and parasite. Other coverage includes: Protozoology, Helminthology, Entomology; Morphology (incl. Pathomorphology, Ultrastructure); Biochemistry, Physiology including Pathophysiology; Parasite-Host-Relationships including Immunology and Host Specificity; life history, ecology and epidemiology; and Diagnosis, Chemotherapy and Control of Parasitic Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信