Intraoperative eSRTs: Feasibility of Measurement and Correlation With Postoperative eSRTs.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Andrina MacDonald, René H Gifford, Allyson Sisler-Dinwiddie, Nichole Dwyer, Kareem Tawfik, Jourdan T Holder
{"title":"Intraoperative eSRTs: Feasibility of Measurement and Correlation With Postoperative eSRTs.","authors":"Andrina MacDonald, René H Gifford, Allyson Sisler-Dinwiddie, Nichole Dwyer, Kareem Tawfik, Jourdan T Holder","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility of intraoperative visual electrically evoked stapedial reflex threshold (eSRT) measurement using the Cochlear SmartNav 2 system, the correlation between intraoperative and postoperative eSRTs, and the correlation between eSRTs measured at 1 and 6 months post-activation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Cochlear implant (CI) program at a tertiary medical center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Fourteen adult CI users.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Intraoperative eSRTs and postoperative eSRTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative eSRTs were successfully measurable on 11 of 14 participants and took approximately 3 minutes to measure. The mean intraoperative eSRT was 13.3 charge units higher than the mean 1-month post-activation eSRT (p < 0.0001). The mean difference between the intraoperative and 1-month post-activation eSRT was 17.5, 15.3, 11.1, 10.5, and 11.8 nC/phase for electrodes 1, 6, 11, 16, and 22, respectively. The combined intraoperative eSRT data for all patients and all electrodes had a standard deviation of 8.5 charge units, whereas the combined 1-month post-activation eSRT data had a standard deviation of 3.2 charge units demonstrating greater intraoperative variability. The mean difference between the 1-month and 6-month post-activation eSRT was 0.2 charge units (p > 0.999).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative eSRT measurement is feasible and time-efficient in adult CI patients. The mean difference between the intraoperative and 1-month post-activation eSRT is similar across the array. However, intraoperative eSRTs are more variable than post-activation eSRTs, and thus, further investigation is needed to reduce this variability and create a clinically useful correction factor. Finally, postoperative eSRTs are stable over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004585","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of intraoperative visual electrically evoked stapedial reflex threshold (eSRT) measurement using the Cochlear SmartNav 2 system, the correlation between intraoperative and postoperative eSRTs, and the correlation between eSRTs measured at 1 and 6 months post-activation.

Study design: Prospective.

Setting: Cochlear implant (CI) program at a tertiary medical center.

Patients: Fourteen adult CI users.

Main outcome measures: Intraoperative eSRTs and postoperative eSRTs.

Results: Intraoperative eSRTs were successfully measurable on 11 of 14 participants and took approximately 3 minutes to measure. The mean intraoperative eSRT was 13.3 charge units higher than the mean 1-month post-activation eSRT (p < 0.0001). The mean difference between the intraoperative and 1-month post-activation eSRT was 17.5, 15.3, 11.1, 10.5, and 11.8 nC/phase for electrodes 1, 6, 11, 16, and 22, respectively. The combined intraoperative eSRT data for all patients and all electrodes had a standard deviation of 8.5 charge units, whereas the combined 1-month post-activation eSRT data had a standard deviation of 3.2 charge units demonstrating greater intraoperative variability. The mean difference between the 1-month and 6-month post-activation eSRT was 0.2 charge units (p > 0.999).

Conclusions: Intraoperative eSRT measurement is feasible and time-efficient in adult CI patients. The mean difference between the intraoperative and 1-month post-activation eSRT is similar across the array. However, intraoperative eSRTs are more variable than post-activation eSRTs, and thus, further investigation is needed to reduce this variability and create a clinically useful correction factor. Finally, postoperative eSRTs are stable over time.

术中esrt:测量的可行性及其与术后esrt的相关性。
目的:评价术中使用人工耳蜗SmartNav 2系统测量视觉电诱发镫叶反射阈值(eSRT)的可行性、术中与术后eSRT的相关性以及激活后1个月与6个月测量的eSRT的相关性。研究设计:前瞻性。环境:三级医疗中心人工耳蜗(CI)项目。患者:14名成人CI使用者。主要观察指标:术中esrt和术后esrt。结果:14名参与者中有11名成功测量术中esrt,测量时间约为3分钟。术中平均eSRT比激活后1个月平均eSRT高13.3个电荷单位(p < 0.0001)。电极1、6、11、16和22的术中和激活后1个月eSRT的平均差值分别为17.5、15.3、11.1、10.5和11.8 nC/phase。所有患者和所有电极的术中eSRT数据的标准偏差为8.5个电荷单位,而激活后1个月的eSRT数据的标准偏差为3.2个电荷单位,显示出更大的术中变异性。激活后1个月和6个月eSRT的平均差异为0.2个电荷单位(p > 0.999)。结论:术中eSRT测量在成人CI患者中是可行且高效的。术中和激活后1个月eSRT的平均差异在整个阵列上是相似的。然而,术中esrt比激活后esrt更具可变性,因此,需要进一步的研究来减少这种可变性并创建临床有用的校正因子。最后,术后esrt随时间稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信