Development of Enzyme-Mediated Duplex Exponential Amplification Assay for Detection and Identification of Meloidogyne enterolobii in Field.

IF 4.1 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Bingxue Sun, Bo Gao, Rongyan Wang, Shulong Chen, Xiuhua Li, Yonghao Dong, Juan Ma
{"title":"Development of Enzyme-Mediated Duplex Exponential Amplification Assay for Detection and Identification of <i>Meloidogyne enterolobii</i> in Field.","authors":"Bingxue Sun, Bo Gao, Rongyan Wang, Shulong Chen, Xiuhua Li, Yonghao Dong, Juan Ma","doi":"10.3390/microorganisms13061353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The root-knot nematode <i>Meloidogyne enterolobii</i> has emerged as a devastating pathogen in global agricultural systems. Its geographic distribution is progressively expanding from tropical to temperate zones, leading to difficulties in discerning the symptoms it causes from those of congeners such as <i>M. incognita</i>. Currently, some molecular diagnostic technologies (e.g., qPCR) have been established for detecting <i>M. enterolobii</i>, but these methods fail to meet field-based detection demands due to their reliance on laboratory-grade thermocyclers. We thus developed a method for detecting <i>M. enterolobii</i> based on enzyme-mediated duplex exponential amplification (EmDEA) technologies to address this issue. The EmDEA detection method demonstrated strict specificity for the target species, showing no amplification in 13 non-target nematodes or host tissue samples. Sensitivity analyses revealed detection limits of 3.6 × 10<sup>-4</sup> ng/μL (purified DNA), 1/1000 of an individual nematode (single-organism detection), 8.97 nematodes/g sweet potato, and 4.08 nematodes/100 g soil, achieving equivalent performance to qPCR. Field validation confirmed successful on-site detection, with significantly higher nematode loads in root tissues (50.41-97.62 nematodes/g) than in rhizospheric soil (1.07-1.28 nematodes/g). The established detection method employs a 42 °C isothermal amplification technology paired with a palm-sized thermal module, enabling field-deployable detection. Its unique duplex exponential amplification mechanism achieves threshold determination 10 cycles (~10 min) faster than conventional qPCR. When integrated with rapid DNA extraction protocols, the entire workflow is completed within 40 min, improving detection efficiency. This study provides a molecular tool for the precise monitoring of <i>M. enterolobii</i>, offering critical support for formulating targeted control strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18667,"journal":{"name":"Microorganisms","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12195551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microorganisms","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13061353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii has emerged as a devastating pathogen in global agricultural systems. Its geographic distribution is progressively expanding from tropical to temperate zones, leading to difficulties in discerning the symptoms it causes from those of congeners such as M. incognita. Currently, some molecular diagnostic technologies (e.g., qPCR) have been established for detecting M. enterolobii, but these methods fail to meet field-based detection demands due to their reliance on laboratory-grade thermocyclers. We thus developed a method for detecting M. enterolobii based on enzyme-mediated duplex exponential amplification (EmDEA) technologies to address this issue. The EmDEA detection method demonstrated strict specificity for the target species, showing no amplification in 13 non-target nematodes or host tissue samples. Sensitivity analyses revealed detection limits of 3.6 × 10-4 ng/μL (purified DNA), 1/1000 of an individual nematode (single-organism detection), 8.97 nematodes/g sweet potato, and 4.08 nematodes/100 g soil, achieving equivalent performance to qPCR. Field validation confirmed successful on-site detection, with significantly higher nematode loads in root tissues (50.41-97.62 nematodes/g) than in rhizospheric soil (1.07-1.28 nematodes/g). The established detection method employs a 42 °C isothermal amplification technology paired with a palm-sized thermal module, enabling field-deployable detection. Its unique duplex exponential amplification mechanism achieves threshold determination 10 cycles (~10 min) faster than conventional qPCR. When integrated with rapid DNA extraction protocols, the entire workflow is completed within 40 min, improving detection efficiency. This study provides a molecular tool for the precise monitoring of M. enterolobii, offering critical support for formulating targeted control strategies.

酶介导双指数扩增法在田间检测和鉴定肠曲线虫的建立。
肠根结线虫已成为全球农业系统中的一种破坏性病原体。它的地理分布正逐步从热带扩大到温带,导致难以区分它所引起的症状与它的同系物,如不认识的M. incognita的症状。目前,已经建立了一些分子诊断技术(如qPCR)来检测肠弧菌,但由于这些方法依赖于实验室级热循环器,因此无法满足现场检测需求。因此,我们开发了一种基于酶介导的双指数扩增(EmDEA)技术检测肠弧菌的方法来解决这一问题。EmDEA检测方法对靶种具有严格的特异性,在13种非靶线虫或宿主组织样本中均无扩增。灵敏度分析显示,检出限为3.6 × 10-4 ng/μL(纯化DNA)、1/1000个线虫(单生物检测)、8.97个线虫/g甘薯和4.08个线虫/100 g土壤,与qPCR的检测效果相当。现场验证证实了现场检测的成功,根组织的线虫负荷(50.41 ~ 97.62线虫/g)显著高于根际土壤(1.07 ~ 1.28线虫/g)。所建立的检测方法采用42°C等温放大技术与手掌大小的热模块相匹配,可以进行现场部署检测。其独特的双指数扩增机制使阈值测定比传统qPCR快10个周期(~10 min)。当与快速DNA提取方案集成时,整个工作流程在40分钟内完成,提高了检测效率。本研究为肠弧菌的精确监测提供了分子工具,为制定有针对性的控制策略提供了重要支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microorganisms
Microorganisms Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2168
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: Microorganisms (ISSN 2076-2607) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and prions. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信