Countermovement Jump Propulsive Kinetics Distinguish Young Weightlifters Who Attain National Qualification.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Stephanie J Morris, Jon L Oliver, Jason S Pedley, Lucy S Kember, G Gregory Haff, Rhodri S Lloyd
{"title":"Countermovement Jump Propulsive Kinetics Distinguish Young Weightlifters Who Attain National Qualification.","authors":"Stephanie J Morris, Jon L Oliver, Jason S Pedley, Lucy S Kember, G Gregory Haff, Rhodri S Lloyd","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Morris, SJ, Oliver, JL, Pedley, JS, Kember, LS, Haff, GG, and Lloyd, RS. Countermovement jump propulsive kinetics distinguish young weightlifters who attain national qualification. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-Researchers have explored the relationship between force-generating abilities and weightlifting performance in young athletes, but it remains unclear whether isometric midthigh pull (IMTP) and countermovement jump (CMJ) kinetics can distinguish between those who achieve national qualification and those who do not. This study aimed to (a) compare IMTP and CMJ kinetics between young weightlifters who did and did not attain national qualification and (b) identify kinetic variables that predict qualification. Thirty-seven young weightlifters were classified into 2 groups: those who qualified (QUAL; age = 17.1 ± 0.3 years, maturity offset = 3.13 ± 0.6 years, males = 15, females = 10) and those who did not qualify (DNQ; age = 15.8 ± 2.2 years, maturity offset = 2.7 ± 1.6 years, males = 6, females = 6). Subjects completed CMJ and IMTP tests on dual force plates. T-tests revealed that QUAL showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher relative force at minimum displacement (g = 0.82), average relative propulsive force (g = 1.76), and average propulsive velocity during the CMJ (g = 0.68), along with a shorter propulsive phase (g = -1.22). In the IMTP, QUAL demonstrated higher relative peak force. Statistical parametric mapping revealed greater relative vertical force at 69-88% of movement time in QUAL, indicating higher force during the CMJ propulsive phase. Binary logistic regression identified CMJ average relative propulsive force and propulsive phase duration as significant predictors of qualification, with strong predictive accuracy (area under the receiver operator curve [AUC] = 0.910, p < 0.05 and AUC = 0.807, p < 0.05), highlighting the value of these variables when identifying and developing young weightlifters for national qualification.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005187","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Morris, SJ, Oliver, JL, Pedley, JS, Kember, LS, Haff, GG, and Lloyd, RS. Countermovement jump propulsive kinetics distinguish young weightlifters who attain national qualification. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-Researchers have explored the relationship between force-generating abilities and weightlifting performance in young athletes, but it remains unclear whether isometric midthigh pull (IMTP) and countermovement jump (CMJ) kinetics can distinguish between those who achieve national qualification and those who do not. This study aimed to (a) compare IMTP and CMJ kinetics between young weightlifters who did and did not attain national qualification and (b) identify kinetic variables that predict qualification. Thirty-seven young weightlifters were classified into 2 groups: those who qualified (QUAL; age = 17.1 ± 0.3 years, maturity offset = 3.13 ± 0.6 years, males = 15, females = 10) and those who did not qualify (DNQ; age = 15.8 ± 2.2 years, maturity offset = 2.7 ± 1.6 years, males = 6, females = 6). Subjects completed CMJ and IMTP tests on dual force plates. T-tests revealed that QUAL showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher relative force at minimum displacement (g = 0.82), average relative propulsive force (g = 1.76), and average propulsive velocity during the CMJ (g = 0.68), along with a shorter propulsive phase (g = -1.22). In the IMTP, QUAL demonstrated higher relative peak force. Statistical parametric mapping revealed greater relative vertical force at 69-88% of movement time in QUAL, indicating higher force during the CMJ propulsive phase. Binary logistic regression identified CMJ average relative propulsive force and propulsive phase duration as significant predictors of qualification, with strong predictive accuracy (area under the receiver operator curve [AUC] = 0.910, p < 0.05 and AUC = 0.807, p < 0.05), highlighting the value of these variables when identifying and developing young weightlifters for national qualification.

反动作跳跃推进动力学是青年举重运动员获得国家资格的标志。
摘要:Morris, SJ, Oliver, JL, Pedley, JS, Kember, LS, Haff, GG, Lloyd, RS。反动作跳跃推进动力学区分获得国家资格的年轻举重运动员。研究人员已经探索了年轻运动员力量生成能力与举重成绩之间的关系,但尚不清楚等距大腿中部牵拉(IMTP)和反动作跳跃(CMJ)动力学是否可以区分获得国家资格的运动员和未获得国家资格的运动员。本研究旨在(a)比较获得和未获得国家资格的年轻举重运动员的IMTP和CMJ动力学;(b)确定预测资格的动力学变量。将37名青年举重运动员分为两组:合格(QUAL)组;年龄= 17.1±0.3岁,成熟期偏移= 3.13±0.6岁,男性= 15岁,女性= 10岁)和不符合条件者(DNQ;年龄= 15.8±2.2岁,成熟偏移= 2.7±1.6岁,男性= 6,女性= 6)。受试者在双力板上完成CMJ和IMTP测试。t检验显示,在最小位移时相对力(g = 0.82)、平均相对推进力(g = 1.76)和CMJ期间平均推进速度(g = 0.68)显著提高(p < 0.05),推进阶段较短(g = -1.22)。在IMTP中,QUAL表现出更高的相对峰值力。统计参数映射显示,在qal运动时间的69-88%时,相对垂直力更大,表明CMJ推进阶段的力更大。二元逻辑回归发现CMJ平均相对推进力和推进阶段持续时间是合格的重要预测因子,预测精度高(接收者算子曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.910, p < 0.05, AUC = 0.807, p < 0.05),突出了这些变量在识别和培养年轻举重运动员获得国家资格时的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信