Investigating creativity and learning style preferences in anesthesia students.

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1355_24
Siavash Sangi, Mehrdad Mesbah Kiaei, Azam Saie, Maryam Aligholizadeh, Azeen Dolati, Melika Aligholizadeh
{"title":"Investigating creativity and learning style preferences in anesthesia students.","authors":"Siavash Sangi, Mehrdad Mesbah Kiaei, Azam Saie, Maryam Aligholizadeh, Azeen Dolati, Melika Aligholizadeh","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1355_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding anesthesia students' creativity and learning styles can significantly enhance educational strategies and professional development within medical sciences. This study aimed to identify the predominant learning styles and creativity levels among anesthesia students at Iran University of Medical Sciences. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Iran University of Medical Sciences, including all anesthesia students of the academic year 2024. A total of 120 students were selected through the census method, and 110 completed questionnaires were analyzed. The Kolb Learning Style Inventory (KLSI V) and Abedi's Creativity Questionnaire were used to assess learning styles and creativity levels, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and t-tests to determine the significance of differences in creativity scores among different learning styles and academic semesters. The study revealed diverse learning styles among students, with converging (37.2%) being the most prevalent, followed by accommodating (30%), assimilating (20%), and diverging (12.7%). Significant differences were found in creativity scores among different learning styles, with converging style students exhibiting higher creativity scores. In addition, younger students showed higher creativity levels and creativity scores tended to decrease as students progressed through academic semesters. Second-semester students demonstrated superior creativity compared to those in later semesters. Identifying learning styles and fostering creativity among anesthesia students is crucial for tailoring educational strategies and enhancing professional development. Recognizing and nurturing creativity can lead to better preparedness in the field, adaptability to challenges, and innovation in patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12200201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1355_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding anesthesia students' creativity and learning styles can significantly enhance educational strategies and professional development within medical sciences. This study aimed to identify the predominant learning styles and creativity levels among anesthesia students at Iran University of Medical Sciences. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Iran University of Medical Sciences, including all anesthesia students of the academic year 2024. A total of 120 students were selected through the census method, and 110 completed questionnaires were analyzed. The Kolb Learning Style Inventory (KLSI V) and Abedi's Creativity Questionnaire were used to assess learning styles and creativity levels, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and t-tests to determine the significance of differences in creativity scores among different learning styles and academic semesters. The study revealed diverse learning styles among students, with converging (37.2%) being the most prevalent, followed by accommodating (30%), assimilating (20%), and diverging (12.7%). Significant differences were found in creativity scores among different learning styles, with converging style students exhibiting higher creativity scores. In addition, younger students showed higher creativity levels and creativity scores tended to decrease as students progressed through academic semesters. Second-semester students demonstrated superior creativity compared to those in later semesters. Identifying learning styles and fostering creativity among anesthesia students is crucial for tailoring educational strategies and enhancing professional development. Recognizing and nurturing creativity can lead to better preparedness in the field, adaptability to challenges, and innovation in patient care.

研究麻醉学生的创造力和学习风格偏好。
了解麻醉学生的创造力和学习风格可以显著提高教育策略和医学专业的发展。本研究旨在确定伊朗医科大学麻醉专业学生的主要学习方式和创造力水平。这项横断面研究在伊朗医学科学大学进行,包括2024学年的所有麻醉专业学生。通过普查法共选取120名学生,对110份完成的问卷进行分析。采用Kolb学习风格量表(KLSI V)和Abedi创造力问卷(Abedi’s Creativity Questionnaire)分别评估学习风格和创造力水平。采用方差分析和t检验进行统计分析,以确定不同学习风格和学习学期之间创造力得分差异的显著性。研究显示,学生的学习方式多种多样,其中趋同(37.2%)最为普遍,其次是适应(30%)、同化(20%)和发散(12.7%)。不同学习风格学生的创造力得分存在显著差异,趋同学习风格学生的创造力得分较高。此外,年龄较小的学生表现出更高的创造力水平,随着学期的进展,创造力得分往往会下降。第二学期的学生比后学期的学生表现出更强的创造力。确定麻醉学生的学习风格和培养他们的创造力对于制定教育策略和促进专业发展至关重要。认识和培养创造力可以使我们在现场做好更好的准备,适应挑战,并在病人护理方面进行创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信