Social Preference of Children at Risk for ADHD in Schools: Do They Have Limited Social Resources and can Friends Protect Against Peer Rejection?

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Attention Disorders Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-27 DOI:10.1177/10870547251349244
de Swart F, Veenman B, Oosterlaan J, Luman M
{"title":"Social Preference of Children at Risk for ADHD in Schools: Do They Have Limited Social Resources and can Friends Protect Against Peer Rejection?","authors":"de Swart F, Veenman B, Oosterlaan J, Luman M","doi":"10.1177/10870547251349244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cross-sectional study investigated social opportunities in children at risk for ADHD in regular primary education classrooms. First, we aimed to compare social preference of children at risk for ADHD and of their unilateral friends, with their classmates. Second, we hypothesized that for the at risk-group higher levels of problem behaviors would be related to having friends with lower social preference, via own lower preference (limited social resources-hypothesis). Third, we hypothesized that having friends with higher social preference could buffer against lower social preference of children in the at-risk group (interpersonal contact-hypothesis).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Our sample consisted of 112 Dutch primary school children at risk for ADHD (84% boys, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 8.89, <i>SD</i> = 1.85), and 2,526 classmates serving as controls. Social preference and preference of unilateral friends was assessed with peer nominations of friendships and peer ratings of preference. Behavioral problems of children at risk for ADHD were assessed by teacher questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>T-tests revealed that children at risk for ADHD and their unilateral friends had lower social preference than their classmates. Children at risk for ADHD nominated classmates with higher preference than themselves as friends, while they were nominated by classmates with similar preference. A path model and two linear regression models showed that higher levels of conduct problems were indirectly related to lower social preference of received unilateral friends, via own lower preference. We found no evidence that interpersonal contact could protect against lower social preference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clearly, children at risk for ADHD suffer from problems in their relationships with classmates.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"896-907"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Attention Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547251349244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This cross-sectional study investigated social opportunities in children at risk for ADHD in regular primary education classrooms. First, we aimed to compare social preference of children at risk for ADHD and of their unilateral friends, with their classmates. Second, we hypothesized that for the at risk-group higher levels of problem behaviors would be related to having friends with lower social preference, via own lower preference (limited social resources-hypothesis). Third, we hypothesized that having friends with higher social preference could buffer against lower social preference of children in the at-risk group (interpersonal contact-hypothesis).

Method: Our sample consisted of 112 Dutch primary school children at risk for ADHD (84% boys, Mage = 8.89, SD = 1.85), and 2,526 classmates serving as controls. Social preference and preference of unilateral friends was assessed with peer nominations of friendships and peer ratings of preference. Behavioral problems of children at risk for ADHD were assessed by teacher questionnaires.

Results: T-tests revealed that children at risk for ADHD and their unilateral friends had lower social preference than their classmates. Children at risk for ADHD nominated classmates with higher preference than themselves as friends, while they were nominated by classmates with similar preference. A path model and two linear regression models showed that higher levels of conduct problems were indirectly related to lower social preference of received unilateral friends, via own lower preference. We found no evidence that interpersonal contact could protect against lower social preference.

Conclusion: Clearly, children at risk for ADHD suffer from problems in their relationships with classmates.

学校ADHD风险儿童的社会偏好:他们的社会资源有限吗?朋友能保护他们免受同伴排斥吗?
目的:本横断面研究调查了普通小学课堂中存在ADHD风险的儿童的社会机会。首先,我们的目的是比较有多动症风险的儿童和他们的单侧朋友的社会偏好,以及他们的同学。其次,我们假设,对于风险组较高水平的问题行为可能与拥有低社会偏好的朋友有关,通过自己的低偏好(有限的社会资源-假设)。第三,我们假设拥有较高社会偏好的朋友可以缓冲风险组中较低社会偏好的儿童(人际接触假设)。方法:我们的样本包括112名有ADHD风险的荷兰小学儿童(84%为男孩,Mage = 8.89, SD = 1.85)和2526名同学作为对照。社会偏好和单方朋友的偏好是通过同伴对友谊的提名和同伴对偏好的评价来评估的。通过教师问卷对有ADHD风险的儿童的行为问题进行评估。结果:t检验显示有ADHD风险的儿童及其单侧朋友的社会偏好低于他们的同学。有多动症风险的儿童提名比自己偏好更高的同学为朋友,而他们被偏好相似的同学提名为朋友。一个路径模型和两个线性回归模型表明,较高的行为问题水平通过自身较低的偏好间接与接受的单方朋友较低的社会偏好相关。我们没有发现任何证据表明人际交往可以防止较低的社会偏好。结论:显然,有多动症风险的儿童在与同学的关系上存在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Attention Disorders (JAD) focuses on basic and applied science concerning attention and related functions in children, adolescents, and adults. JAD publishes articles on diagnosis, comorbidity, neuropsychological functioning, psychopharmacology, and psychosocial issues. The journal also addresses practice, policy, and theory, as well as review articles, commentaries, in-depth analyses, empirical research articles, and case presentations or program evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信