The modes of action for rodent liver tumor formation by activators of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) are not relevant to human cancer risk: an updated critical evaluation.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Tomoya Yamada, Samuel M Cohen, Brian G Lake
{"title":"The modes of action for rodent liver tumor formation by activators of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) are not relevant to human cancer risk: an updated critical evaluation.","authors":"Tomoya Yamada, Samuel M Cohen, Brian G Lake","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2513332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activators have long been known to enhance hepatocellular carcinogenesis in rodents, with the prototypic chemical being phenobarbital (PB). This has raised an ongoing controversy for the past 50 years as to whether this is relevant to human cancer risk. The established mode of action (MOA) for rodent liver tumor formation by CAR activators includes receptor activation, increased hepatocellular proliferation, altered liver foci and ultimately liver tumors. We previously published a critical review indicating the pivotal species difference that CAR activators are mitogenic agents in mouse and rat hepatocytes, but they do not stimulate hepatocellular proliferation in humans based on molecular downstream interaction differences, thus CAR activators pose no liver carcinogenic risk to humans (Yamada et al. <i>Crit Rev Toxicol 2021</i>). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) activators induce rodent liver tumors through a similar MOA, again involving increased hepatocellular proliferation, but are generally considered not relevant to human cancer risk. As with CAR activators, PPARα activators are mitogenic in rodent liver but not in other species, including humans. This species-specific effect of CAR and PPARα activators provides critical information useful for the overall risk assessments of these molecules, including pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, food additives, and other chemicals. Overall, based on the available data for the specific molecular effects of these agents, the time has come to consider that chemicals for which the MOA of liver carcinogenicity observed in rodents has been clearly identified as either CAR- or PPARα-mediated (with other MOAs having been excluded) can be judged as having no relevance to human cancer risk without further investigations being necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1-38"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2025.2513332","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activators have long been known to enhance hepatocellular carcinogenesis in rodents, with the prototypic chemical being phenobarbital (PB). This has raised an ongoing controversy for the past 50 years as to whether this is relevant to human cancer risk. The established mode of action (MOA) for rodent liver tumor formation by CAR activators includes receptor activation, increased hepatocellular proliferation, altered liver foci and ultimately liver tumors. We previously published a critical review indicating the pivotal species difference that CAR activators are mitogenic agents in mouse and rat hepatocytes, but they do not stimulate hepatocellular proliferation in humans based on molecular downstream interaction differences, thus CAR activators pose no liver carcinogenic risk to humans (Yamada et al. Crit Rev Toxicol 2021). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) activators induce rodent liver tumors through a similar MOA, again involving increased hepatocellular proliferation, but are generally considered not relevant to human cancer risk. As with CAR activators, PPARα activators are mitogenic in rodent liver but not in other species, including humans. This species-specific effect of CAR and PPARα activators provides critical information useful for the overall risk assessments of these molecules, including pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, food additives, and other chemicals. Overall, based on the available data for the specific molecular effects of these agents, the time has come to consider that chemicals for which the MOA of liver carcinogenicity observed in rodents has been clearly identified as either CAR- or PPARα-mediated (with other MOAs having been excluded) can be judged as having no relevance to human cancer risk without further investigations being necessary.

一项最新的关键评估表明,组成型雄甾烷受体(CAR)和过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体α (PPARα)的激活剂对啮齿动物肝脏肿瘤形成的作用模式与人类癌症风险无关。
组成型雄甾受体(CAR)激活剂长期以来被认为可以促进啮齿动物的肝细胞癌变,其原型化学物质是苯巴比妥(PB)。在过去的50年里,这引发了一场持续的争论,即这是否与人类癌症风险有关。CAR激活剂对啮齿动物肝脏肿瘤形成的作用模式(MOA)包括受体激活、肝细胞增殖增加、肝脏病灶改变和最终肝脏肿瘤。我们之前发表了一篇重要的综述,指出了关键的物种差异,即CAR激活剂是小鼠和大鼠肝细胞中的有分裂剂,但基于分子下游相互作用的差异,它们不会刺激人类肝细胞增殖,因此CAR激活剂不会对人类造成肝癌风险(Yamada等)。Crit Rev Toxicol 2021)。过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体α (PPARα)激活剂通过类似的MOA诱导啮齿动物肝脏肿瘤,同样涉及肝细胞增殖增加,但通常被认为与人类癌症风险无关。与CAR激活剂一样,PPARα激活剂在啮齿类动物肝脏中有丝分裂,但在其他物种(包括人类)中没有。CAR和PPARα激活剂的这种物种特异性效应为这些分子(包括药物、农用化学品、食品添加剂和其他化学品)的整体风险评估提供了有用的关键信息。总的来说,根据这些药物的特定分子效应的现有数据,现在是时候考虑在啮齿类动物中观察到的肝脏致癌性MOA已被明确确定为CAR-或ppar α介导的化学物质(其他MOA已被排除在外),无需进一步调查就可以判断其与人类癌症风险无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Toxicology provides up-to-date, objective analyses of topics related to the mechanisms of action, responses, and assessment of health risks due to toxicant exposure. The journal publishes critical, comprehensive reviews of research findings in toxicology and the application of toxicological information in assessing human health hazards and risks. Toxicants of concern include commodity and specialty chemicals such as formaldehyde, acrylonitrile, and pesticides; pharmaceutical agents of all types; consumer products such as macronutrients and food additives; environmental agents such as ambient ozone; and occupational exposures such as asbestos and benzene.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信