Diagnostic value of serologic biomarkers for the detection of liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22088/cjim.16.2.275
Mahsa Mohammadi, Keyvan Aminian, Farahnaz Joukar, Mohsen Rajabnia, Khaled Rahmani, Alireza Doostian, Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei
{"title":"Diagnostic value of serologic biomarkers for the detection of liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.","authors":"Mahsa Mohammadi, Keyvan Aminian, Farahnaz Joukar, Mohsen Rajabnia, Khaled Rahmani, Alireza Doostian, Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei","doi":"10.22088/cjim.16.2.275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of various non-invasive methods for Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) diagnosis in an Iranian population. The methods studied included aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase ratio (AAR), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet count index (AP index), fibrosis index (FI), NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), Forns index, BARD score, BAAT score and PLALA score. The aim of the current study was to correlate these methods with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and serum fibrosis markers, using FibroScan as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study of 504 patients with NAFLD or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), FibroScan examinations were performed and demographic, clinical and biochemical data were collected. Statistical analyses evaluated the performance of each diagnostic panel, calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The APRI had high specificity (97.27%) but low sensitivity (4.12%) and limited discriminatory power AUC: 0.50) in the fibrosis panel. In contrast, Forns index and NFS had better AUC values (0.64 and 0.63, respectively), with the NFS having a sensitivity of 80%, indicating potential for broad-based screening. In the cirrhosis panel, the APRI was characterized by high specificity (98.21%) but had low sensitivity (4%) and limited discriminatory power (AUC: 0.51), while the FIB-4 had the highest AUC (0.67) and a sensitivity of 60%, suggesting its efficacy as a screening tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NFS and FIB-4 showed promising performance among the evaluated panels for population screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":9646,"journal":{"name":"Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"16 2","pages":"275-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22088/cjim.16.2.275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of various non-invasive methods for Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) diagnosis in an Iranian population. The methods studied included aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase ratio (AAR), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet count index (AP index), fibrosis index (FI), NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), Forns index, BARD score, BAAT score and PLALA score. The aim of the current study was to correlate these methods with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and serum fibrosis markers, using FibroScan as the gold standard.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study of 504 patients with NAFLD or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), FibroScan examinations were performed and demographic, clinical and biochemical data were collected. Statistical analyses evaluated the performance of each diagnostic panel, calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy.

Results: The APRI had high specificity (97.27%) but low sensitivity (4.12%) and limited discriminatory power AUC: 0.50) in the fibrosis panel. In contrast, Forns index and NFS had better AUC values (0.64 and 0.63, respectively), with the NFS having a sensitivity of 80%, indicating potential for broad-based screening. In the cirrhosis panel, the APRI was characterized by high specificity (98.21%) but had low sensitivity (4%) and limited discriminatory power (AUC: 0.51), while the FIB-4 had the highest AUC (0.67) and a sensitivity of 60%, suggesting its efficacy as a screening tool.

Conclusion: NFS and FIB-4 showed promising performance among the evaluated panels for population screening.

血清学生物标志物检测非酒精性脂肪肝肝纤维化的诊断价值
背景:本研究的目的是评估各种非侵入性方法诊断伊朗人群非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)的准确性。研究方法包括:天门冬氨酸转氨酶/血小板比值指数(APRI)、纤维化-4指数(FIB-4)、天门冬氨酸转氨酶/丙氨酸转氨酶比值(AAR)、天门冬氨酸转氨酶/血小板计数指数(AP指数)、纤维化指数(FI)、NAFLD纤维化评分(NFS)、Forns指数、BARD评分、BAAT评分和PLALA评分。当前研究的目的是将这些方法与肝硬度测量(LSM)和血清纤维化标志物联系起来,使用FibroScan作为金标准。方法:对504例NAFLD或非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)患者进行横断面研究,进行纤维扫描检查,收集人口统计学、临床和生化数据。统计分析评估每个诊断组的表现,计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性。结果:APRI在纤维化组中特异性高(97.27%),敏感性低(4.12%),鉴别能力有限(AUC: 0.50)。相比之下,Forns指数和NFS具有更好的AUC值(分别为0.64和0.63),NFS具有80%的灵敏度,表明具有广泛筛选的潜力。在肝硬化组中,APRI具有高特异性(98.21%),但低敏感性(4%)和有限的区分力(AUC: 0.51),而FIB-4具有最高的AUC(0.67)和60%的敏感性,表明其作为筛查工具的有效性。结论:NFS和FIB-4在人群筛查中表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
90
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信