The association of the child opportunity index on outcomes in paediatric patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Brock A Karolcik, Kevin L Smith, Michael J Calcaterra, Mary D Schiff, Maya I Ragavan, Tarek Alsaied, Christopher W Follansbee, Lee B Beerman, Gaurav Arora
{"title":"The association of the child opportunity index on outcomes in paediatric patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White.","authors":"Brock A Karolcik, Kevin L Smith, Michael J Calcaterra, Mary D Schiff, Maya I Ragavan, Tarek Alsaied, Christopher W Follansbee, Lee B Beerman, Gaurav Arora","doi":"10.1017/S1047951125100802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Child Opportunity Index is an index of 29 indicators of social determinants of health linked to the United States of America Census. Disparities in the treatment of Wolff-Parkinson-White have not be reported. We hypothesise that lower Child Opportunity Index levels are associated with greater disease burden (antiarrhythmic use, ablation success, and Wolff-Parkinson-White recurrence) and ablation utilisation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, single-centre study was performed with Wolff-Parkinson-White patients who received care from January 2021 to July 2023. Following exclusion for <5 years old and with haemodynamically significant CHD, 267 patients were included (45% high, 30% moderate, and 25% low Child Opportunity Index). Multi-level logistic and log-linear regression was performed to assess the relationship between Child Opportunity Index levels and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low patients were more likely to be Black (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and to have public insurance (<i>p</i> = 0.0006), though, there were no significant differences in ablation utilisation (<i>p</i> = 0.44) or time from diagnosis to ablation (<i>p</i> = 0.37) between groups. There was an inverse relationship with emergency department use (<i>p</i> = 0.007). The low group had 2.8 times greater odds of having one or more emergency department visits compared to the high group (<i>p</i> = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Child Opportunity Index was not related with ablation utilisation, while there was an inverse relationship in emergency department use. These findings suggest that while social determinants of health, as measured by Child Opportunity Index, may influence emergency department utilisation, they do not appear to impact the overall management and procedural timing for Wolff-Parkinson-White treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9435,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in the Young","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in the Young","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951125100802","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Child Opportunity Index is an index of 29 indicators of social determinants of health linked to the United States of America Census. Disparities in the treatment of Wolff-Parkinson-White have not be reported. We hypothesise that lower Child Opportunity Index levels are associated with greater disease burden (antiarrhythmic use, ablation success, and Wolff-Parkinson-White recurrence) and ablation utilisation.

Methods: A retrospective, single-centre study was performed with Wolff-Parkinson-White patients who received care from January 2021 to July 2023. Following exclusion for <5 years old and with haemodynamically significant CHD, 267 patients were included (45% high, 30% moderate, and 25% low Child Opportunity Index). Multi-level logistic and log-linear regression was performed to assess the relationship between Child Opportunity Index levels and outcomes.

Results: Low patients were more likely to be Black (p < 0.0001) and to have public insurance (p = 0.0006), though, there were no significant differences in ablation utilisation (p = 0.44) or time from diagnosis to ablation (p = 0.37) between groups. There was an inverse relationship with emergency department use (p = 0.007). The low group had 2.8 times greater odds of having one or more emergency department visits compared to the high group (p = 0.004).

Conclusion: The Child Opportunity Index was not related with ablation utilisation, while there was an inverse relationship in emergency department use. These findings suggest that while social determinants of health, as measured by Child Opportunity Index, may influence emergency department utilisation, they do not appear to impact the overall management and procedural timing for Wolff-Parkinson-White treatment.

儿童机会指数与小儿沃尔夫-帕金森-怀特患者预后的关系。
背景:儿童机会指数是与美国人口普查有关的29个健康社会决定因素指标的指数。沃尔夫-帕金森氏-怀特症治疗的差异尚未被报道。我们假设较低的儿童机会指数水平与更大的疾病负担(抗心律失常使用、消融成功和Wolff-Parkinson-White复发)和消融利用相关。方法:对2021年1月至2023年7月接受治疗的沃尔夫-帕金森-怀特患者进行回顾性单中心研究。排除结果:低患者更有可能是黑人(p < 0.0001)和有公共保险(p = 0.0006),尽管两组之间在消融术的使用(p = 0.44)或从诊断到消融术的时间(p = 0.37)方面没有显著差异。与急诊科使用呈负相关(p = 0.007)。与高组相比,低组有一次或多次急诊就诊的几率是2.8倍(p = 0.004)。结论:儿童机会指数与消融术的使用无关,而在急诊科的使用呈反比关系。这些发现表明,虽然由儿童机会指数衡量的健康的社会决定因素可能会影响急诊科的利用,但它们似乎不会影响沃尔夫-帕金森-怀特治疗的整体管理和程序时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology in the Young
Cardiology in the Young 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
715
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology in the Young is devoted to cardiovascular issues affecting the young, and the older patient suffering the sequels of congenital heart disease, or other cardiac diseases acquired in childhood. The journal serves the interests of all professionals concerned with these topics. By design, the journal is international and multidisciplinary in its approach, and members of the editorial board take an active role in the its mission, helping to make it the essential journal in paediatric cardiology. All aspects of paediatric cardiology are covered within the journal. The content includes original articles, brief reports, editorials, reviews, and papers devoted to continuing professional development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信