Hemodynamic Considerations of Distal Perfusion Catheters With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Dynamic Mock Loop Study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Joshua G Crane, Gretel Monreal, Steven C Koenig, Mark S Slaughter
{"title":"Hemodynamic Considerations of Distal Perfusion Catheters With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Dynamic Mock Loop Study.","authors":"Joshua G Crane, Gretel Monreal, Steven C Koenig, Mark S Slaughter","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are conflicting clinical data on whether the use of a distal perfusion catheter (DPC) is beneficial for reducing the risk of limb ischemia in peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) patients. We investigated the hemodynamic effects of arterial cannula size, use of and size of a DPC, and ECMO flow (pump speed) on femoral artery hemodynamics in an adult peripheral VA-ECMO dynamic mock loop. The mock loop was tuned to heart failure conditions (cardiac output 3 L/min, arterial pressure 50 mm Hg, venous pressure 20 mm Hg). Three arterial cannulae (15Fr, 17Fr, 19Fr; right iliac) were each integrated into the loop with/without DPC (none, 5Fr, 8Fr; right superficial femoral artery [RSFA]), creating nine configurations tested. Hemodynamic pressures and flows were recorded over a range of pump speeds generating 0-3.5 L/min ECMO flow. The right femoral arteries demonstrated reduced flow, pressure, and pulsatility compared with the left across all cannula configurations and which worsened with increasing arterial cannula size and ECMO flow. Impaired right femoral hemodynamics were not improved with the use or size of DPC, suggesting that the increased resistance created by the presence of the arterial cannula and the DPC may be too great to overcome, thereby offsetting any potential flow benefits provided by the DPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002494","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are conflicting clinical data on whether the use of a distal perfusion catheter (DPC) is beneficial for reducing the risk of limb ischemia in peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) patients. We investigated the hemodynamic effects of arterial cannula size, use of and size of a DPC, and ECMO flow (pump speed) on femoral artery hemodynamics in an adult peripheral VA-ECMO dynamic mock loop. The mock loop was tuned to heart failure conditions (cardiac output 3 L/min, arterial pressure 50 mm Hg, venous pressure 20 mm Hg). Three arterial cannulae (15Fr, 17Fr, 19Fr; right iliac) were each integrated into the loop with/without DPC (none, 5Fr, 8Fr; right superficial femoral artery [RSFA]), creating nine configurations tested. Hemodynamic pressures and flows were recorded over a range of pump speeds generating 0-3.5 L/min ECMO flow. The right femoral arteries demonstrated reduced flow, pressure, and pulsatility compared with the left across all cannula configurations and which worsened with increasing arterial cannula size and ECMO flow. Impaired right femoral hemodynamics were not improved with the use or size of DPC, suggesting that the increased resistance created by the presence of the arterial cannula and the DPC may be too great to overcome, thereby offsetting any potential flow benefits provided by the DPC.

远端灌注导管与静脉体外膜氧合的血流动力学考虑:动态模拟环研究。
对于外周静脉动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)患者使用远端灌注导管(DPC)是否有利于降低肢体缺血风险,临床数据存在矛盾。在成人外周VA-ECMO动态模拟环路中,我们研究了动脉插管大小、DPC的使用和大小以及ECMO流量(泵速)对股动脉血流动力学的影响。模拟环路调整为心力衰竭状态(心输出量3 L/min,动脉压50 mm Hg,静脉压20 mm Hg)。三条动脉插管(15Fr, 17Fr, 19Fr;右髂)分别纳入有/没有DPC的环(无,5Fr, 8Fr;右股浅动脉[RSFA]),创建了九种测试配置。在泵转速范围内记录血流动力学压力和流量,产生0-3.5 L/min ECMO流量。与左股动脉相比,右股动脉在所有插管配置中均表现出血流、压力和搏动性降低,并随着动脉插管尺寸和ECMO流量的增加而恶化。受损的右股血流动力学并没有随着DPC的使用或大小而改善,这表明由于动脉插管和DPC的存在而增加的阻力可能太大而无法克服,从而抵消了DPC提供的任何潜在的血流益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信