Microbiota profiles and antimicrobial resistance genes in sow fecal samples from farms with and without antibiotic use.

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Sutthawongwadee Senawin, Chaiyapoom Bunchasak, Choawit Rakangthong, Chanwit Kaewtapee, Suporn Foongladda, Komwit Surachat, Rattapha Chinli, Wiriya Loongyai
{"title":"Microbiota profiles and antimicrobial resistance genes in sow fecal samples from farms with and without antibiotic use.","authors":"Sutthawongwadee Senawin, Chaiyapoom Bunchasak, Choawit Rakangthong, Chanwit Kaewtapee, Suporn Foongladda, Komwit Surachat, Rattapha Chinli, Wiriya Loongyai","doi":"10.5713/ab.25.0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Antibiotics have been used in swine production, and they are known to be associated with the gut microbiota and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study aimed to evaluate the dynamics of the microbiota and AMR among fecal bacteria in sowsby 16S rRNA gene sequencing and TaqMan array card assays.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 40 healthy multiparous sows were tested in a completely randomized design. Sows were randomly divided into two groups: one was fed a commercial diet with antibiotics for 3 weeks from mating to day 21 of gestation, before the farrowing stage (amoxycillin 300 mg/kg and tiamulin 150 mg/kg: control group, ABO), and the other was fed the same diet without antibiotics (treatment group, NOABO).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ABO group had a higher alpha diversity than the NOABO group (P < 0.05). The results re-vealed the highest bacterial abundance in the phylum Firmicutes in sow feces in the ABO group at an average level of 92.01% and 92.32% in the NOABO group. Erysipelotrichaceae, Clostridiaceae, and Terrisporobacter in the ABO group had enriched proportions. On the other hand, Lactobacillales, Bacilli, and Streptococcus were enriched in the NOABO group (P < 0.05). In terms of AMR, a comparison of the normal log of resistance gene copies between the ABO and NOABO groups displays that the gene copy number was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the ABO group (59%) than in the NOABO group (41%) especially those of β-lactam, aminoglycosides, quinolones, and macrolides.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our investigations discovered that the core microbiota of withdrawal antibiotics may be related to the gut microbiota and AMR. Therefore, understanding the gut microbiota composition and function in animals could enable strategies for its modulation to improve sows' gut microbiota and minimize the negative impact of antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":7825,"journal":{"name":"Animal Bioscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Bioscience","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.25.0062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Antibiotics have been used in swine production, and they are known to be associated with the gut microbiota and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study aimed to evaluate the dynamics of the microbiota and AMR among fecal bacteria in sowsby 16S rRNA gene sequencing and TaqMan array card assays.

Methods: A total of 40 healthy multiparous sows were tested in a completely randomized design. Sows were randomly divided into two groups: one was fed a commercial diet with antibiotics for 3 weeks from mating to day 21 of gestation, before the farrowing stage (amoxycillin 300 mg/kg and tiamulin 150 mg/kg: control group, ABO), and the other was fed the same diet without antibiotics (treatment group, NOABO).

Results: The ABO group had a higher alpha diversity than the NOABO group (P < 0.05). The results re-vealed the highest bacterial abundance in the phylum Firmicutes in sow feces in the ABO group at an average level of 92.01% and 92.32% in the NOABO group. Erysipelotrichaceae, Clostridiaceae, and Terrisporobacter in the ABO group had enriched proportions. On the other hand, Lactobacillales, Bacilli, and Streptococcus were enriched in the NOABO group (P < 0.05). In terms of AMR, a comparison of the normal log of resistance gene copies between the ABO and NOABO groups displays that the gene copy number was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the ABO group (59%) than in the NOABO group (41%) especially those of β-lactam, aminoglycosides, quinolones, and macrolides.

Conclusion: Our investigations discovered that the core microbiota of withdrawal antibiotics may be related to the gut microbiota and AMR. Therefore, understanding the gut microbiota composition and function in animals could enable strategies for its modulation to improve sows' gut microbiota and minimize the negative impact of antibiotics.

使用和不使用抗生素的农场的母猪粪便样本中的微生物群概况和抗微生物药物耐药性基因。
目的:抗生素已经在猪生产中使用,并且已知它们与肠道微生物群和抗菌素耐药性(AMR)有关。本研究旨在通过16S rRNA基因测序和TaqMan芯片分析,评价母猪粪便细菌中微生物群和AMR的动态变化。方法:采用完全随机设计,对40头健康多胎母猪进行试验。将母猪随机分为两组,一组从配种至妊娠第21天分娩前饲喂含抗生素的商品饲粮(对照组为ABO,阿莫西林300 mg/kg和替亚穆林150 mg/kg),另一组饲喂不含抗生素的相同饲粮(治疗组为NOABO)。结果:ABO组α多样性高于NOABO组(P < 0.05)。结果显示,ABO组母猪粪便中厚壁菌门细菌丰度最高,平均水平为92.01%,NOABO组为92.32%。丹毒杆菌科、梭菌科和恐怖杆菌在ABO组中比例丰富。NOABO组乳酸杆菌、芽胞杆菌和链球菌含量显著增加(P < 0.05)。在AMR方面,比较ABO组和NOABO组耐药基因拷贝数的正常对数,ABO组的基因拷贝数(59%)明显高于NOABO组(41%),尤其是β-内酰胺类、氨基糖苷类、喹诺酮类和大环内酯类基因拷贝数(P < 0.05)。结论:我们的调查发现停药抗生素的核心菌群可能与肠道菌群和AMR有关。因此,了解动物肠道微生物群的组成和功能,可以制定调节策略,改善母猪肠道微生物群,最大限度地减少抗生素的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Bioscience
Animal Bioscience AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
223
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信