Endoscopic Deep Plane Facelift: A Classified Approach.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Mirza Firat
{"title":"Endoscopic Deep Plane Facelift: A Classified Approach.","authors":"Mirza Firat","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional facelift techniques, although effective in addressing facial aging, are often associated with visible scarring and stigmas. These factors contribute to patient hesitation and a growing preference for non- surgical alternatives. In recent years, endoscopic approaches have gained popularity by offering scar-concealed access and deep plane dissection, but many techniques lack a standardized framework for patient selection and reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to present a systematic endoscopic facelift technique which proposes a five-group classification system to guide patient-specific surgical planning and optimize aesthetic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 393 patients underwent endoscopic facelift surgery performed by a single surgeon between 2020 and 2024. Patients were categorized into five groups based on facial aging patterns and anatomical needs, including browlift, midface lift, lower facelift, and neck correction. The technique emphasized minimal skin undermining, vertical vector elevation, and cable suture suspension. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months postoperatively. Complications, revisions, and outcomes were recorded prospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no cases of permanent nerve injury. Revision surgery for cosmetic concerns was performed in 19 patients (4.8%), most of whom were among the first 100 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This vertical vector endoscopic facelift technique demonstrates consistent aesthetic results with a low complication and revision rate. By combining a classification-based surgical strategy with minimally invasive access and deep anatomical correction, this method offers a reproducible, safe, and natural-appearing alternative to traditional facelift approaches. Future studies will aim to incorporate objective assessments and patient- reported outcome measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditional facelift techniques, although effective in addressing facial aging, are often associated with visible scarring and stigmas. These factors contribute to patient hesitation and a growing preference for non- surgical alternatives. In recent years, endoscopic approaches have gained popularity by offering scar-concealed access and deep plane dissection, but many techniques lack a standardized framework for patient selection and reproducibility.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to present a systematic endoscopic facelift technique which proposes a five-group classification system to guide patient-specific surgical planning and optimize aesthetic outcomes.

Methods: A total of 393 patients underwent endoscopic facelift surgery performed by a single surgeon between 2020 and 2024. Patients were categorized into five groups based on facial aging patterns and anatomical needs, including browlift, midface lift, lower facelift, and neck correction. The technique emphasized minimal skin undermining, vertical vector elevation, and cable suture suspension. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months postoperatively. Complications, revisions, and outcomes were recorded prospectively.

Results: There were no cases of permanent nerve injury. Revision surgery for cosmetic concerns was performed in 19 patients (4.8%), most of whom were among the first 100 cases.

Conclusions: This vertical vector endoscopic facelift technique demonstrates consistent aesthetic results with a low complication and revision rate. By combining a classification-based surgical strategy with minimally invasive access and deep anatomical correction, this method offers a reproducible, safe, and natural-appearing alternative to traditional facelift approaches. Future studies will aim to incorporate objective assessments and patient- reported outcome measures.

内窥镜深平面拉皮术:一种分类方法。
背景:传统的整容技术,虽然有效地解决面部老化,往往与可见的疤痕和柱头。这些因素导致患者犹豫,越来越倾向于选择非手术治疗。近年来,内窥镜入路因提供疤痕隐藏通路和深平面解剖而受到欢迎,但许多技术缺乏患者选择和可重复性的标准化框架。目的:本研究的目的是介绍一种系统的内窥镜拉皮技术,提出了一个五组分类系统,以指导患者特定的手术计划和优化美学结果。方法:在2020年至2024年期间,共有393例患者接受了由一名外科医生进行的内窥镜拉皮手术。患者根据面部老化模式和解剖需求分为五组,包括眉部拉皮、中面部拉皮、下面部拉皮和颈部矫正。该技术强调皮肤损伤最小,垂直矢量提升和电缆缝合悬吊。所有患者术后随访至少12个月。前瞻性地记录并发症、修订和结果。结果:无永久性神经损伤病例。19例患者(4.8%)因美容问题进行翻修手术,其中大多数是前100例患者。结论:垂直矢量内窥镜拉皮技术具有一致性的美学效果,并发症低,翻修率低。通过将基于分类的手术策略与微创进入和深度解剖矫正相结合,该方法提供了一种可重复、安全、自然的传统整容方法。未来的研究将旨在结合客观评估和患者报告的结果测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信