Enhancing Medical Student Resilience and Wellness: Assessing Acceptability of a Supportive Student-Alumni Network.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Delaney Schrenk, Aydin Kaghazchi
{"title":"Enhancing Medical Student Resilience and Wellness: Assessing Acceptability of a Supportive Student-Alumni Network.","authors":"Delaney Schrenk, Aydin Kaghazchi","doi":"10.1007/s40596-025-02164-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot study assessed the acceptability of an online network where medical students could seek advice from alumni regarding social and academic challenges. Objectives included assembling a critical mass of students and alumni who would be interested and determining if alumni's past experiences overlap with current student challenges and what communication modalities both parties would use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was sent to first-, second-, and third-year medical students at the University of Cincinnati to gauge interest and to see which experiences they would want support for. It was advertised through emails, newsletters, posters, and social media. A similar survey was sent to alumni who graduated in the past 5 years. Responses were collected over 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses from 78 of 535 (15%) students and 36 alumni were collected, with 71% (55/78) of students and 91% (33/36) of alumni being interested. The most common topics for both groups were burnout, depression, anxiety, loneliness, and ending a relationship. There was at least one alumnus for each experience. Of 31 alumni and 57 students who answered how to meet, 61% of alumni preferred phone for first contact, and 85% of students preferred virtual meetings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that creating a student-alumni network was acceptable due to similar demographics and overlapping experiences. The data indicated that students could contact alumni by phone to discuss how to meet given the diversity of student preferences. This resource could be explored at other medical schools as a novel means of support.</p>","PeriodicalId":7069,"journal":{"name":"Academic Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-025-02164-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This pilot study assessed the acceptability of an online network where medical students could seek advice from alumni regarding social and academic challenges. Objectives included assembling a critical mass of students and alumni who would be interested and determining if alumni's past experiences overlap with current student challenges and what communication modalities both parties would use.

Methods: A survey was sent to first-, second-, and third-year medical students at the University of Cincinnati to gauge interest and to see which experiences they would want support for. It was advertised through emails, newsletters, posters, and social media. A similar survey was sent to alumni who graduated in the past 5 years. Responses were collected over 3 months.

Results: Responses from 78 of 535 (15%) students and 36 alumni were collected, with 71% (55/78) of students and 91% (33/36) of alumni being interested. The most common topics for both groups were burnout, depression, anxiety, loneliness, and ending a relationship. There was at least one alumnus for each experience. Of 31 alumni and 57 students who answered how to meet, 61% of alumni preferred phone for first contact, and 85% of students preferred virtual meetings.

Conclusions: The results suggest that creating a student-alumni network was acceptable due to similar demographics and overlapping experiences. The data indicated that students could contact alumni by phone to discuss how to meet given the diversity of student preferences. This resource could be explored at other medical schools as a novel means of support.

增强医学生的弹性和健康:评估一个支持性的学生校友网络的可接受性。
目的:本初步研究评估了一个在线网络的可接受性,在这个网络中,医学生可以从校友那里寻求有关社会和学术挑战的建议。目标包括聚集大量感兴趣的学生和校友,确定校友过去的经历是否与当前学生面临的挑战重叠,以及双方将采用何种沟通方式。方法:向辛辛那提大学一年级、二年级和三年级的医学院学生发送了一份调查问卷,以衡量他们的兴趣,并看看他们想要支持哪些经历。它通过电子邮件、时事通讯、海报和社交媒体进行宣传。对过去5年毕业的校友也进行了类似的调查。问卷收集时间为3个月。结果:535名学生中有78名(15%)和36名校友回复,其中71%(55/78)的学生和91%(33/36)的校友感兴趣。这两组人最常见的话题是精疲力竭、抑郁、焦虑、孤独和结束一段关系。每次经历至少有一位校友。在31名校友和57名回答如何见面的学生中,61%的校友更喜欢电话作为第一次见面的方式,85%的学生更喜欢虚拟见面。结论:结果表明,由于相似的人口统计和重叠的经历,创建一个学生校友网络是可以接受的。数据显示,鉴于学生偏好的多样性,学生可以通过电话联系校友,讨论如何见面。这一资源可以在其他医学院作为一种新的支持手段加以探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: Academic Psychiatry is the international journal of the American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry, American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training, Association for Academic Psychiatry, and Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry publishes original, scholarly work in psychiatry and the behavioral sciences that focuses on innovative education, academic leadership, and advocacy. The scope of the journal includes work that furthers knowledge and stimulates evidence-based advances in academic psychiatry in the following domains: education and training, leadership and administration, career and professional development, ethics and professionalism, and health and well-being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信