David J. Grüning, Julia Kamin, Emily Saltz, Tin Acosta, Dominic DiFranzo, Beth Goldberg, Alex Leavitt, Filippo Menczer, Tyler Musgrave, Yixue Wang, Magdalena Wojcieszak
{"title":"Independently testing prosocial interventions: Methods and recommendations from 31 researchers","authors":"David J. Grüning, Julia Kamin, Emily Saltz, Tin Acosta, Dominic DiFranzo, Beth Goldberg, Alex Leavitt, Filippo Menczer, Tyler Musgrave, Yixue Wang, Magdalena Wojcieszak","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a growing need for independent, ecologically valid research on prosocial design interventions within online platforms. Platform design has a significant impact on user interactions, yet independent researchers often lack access to live platforms, limiting the ecological validity of studies testing the effectiveness of prosocial interventions. In response, 31 experts from academia, industry, and civil society gathered for a workshop focused on understanding methods that enable effective research on design interventions that lead to prosocial outcomes, such as healthy interactions and individual safety, well‐being, and dignity. We synthesize the workshop findings to guide researchers and practitioners in advancing prosocial design and to provide stakeholders—platforms, advocacy groups, and regulators—with evidence‐based tools to promote healthy online behavior. First, we present a review of the dominant research methods in the field. Second, we highlight the challenges that researchers agreed were most prominent (such as reinvention of the wheel) for testing interventions and recommend ways to address them. Finally, we propose specific future actions to address the challenges in the areas of knowledge sharing, events, and supporting infrastructure that experts consider most worth pursuing, and set out an agenda for future online prosocial research and investment.","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15393","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is a growing need for independent, ecologically valid research on prosocial design interventions within online platforms. Platform design has a significant impact on user interactions, yet independent researchers often lack access to live platforms, limiting the ecological validity of studies testing the effectiveness of prosocial interventions. In response, 31 experts from academia, industry, and civil society gathered for a workshop focused on understanding methods that enable effective research on design interventions that lead to prosocial outcomes, such as healthy interactions and individual safety, well‐being, and dignity. We synthesize the workshop findings to guide researchers and practitioners in advancing prosocial design and to provide stakeholders—platforms, advocacy groups, and regulators—with evidence‐based tools to promote healthy online behavior. First, we present a review of the dominant research methods in the field. Second, we highlight the challenges that researchers agreed were most prominent (such as reinvention of the wheel) for testing interventions and recommend ways to address them. Finally, we propose specific future actions to address the challenges in the areas of knowledge sharing, events, and supporting infrastructure that experts consider most worth pursuing, and set out an agenda for future online prosocial research and investment.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.