Muhammad Ali, Mathias Bressel, David Chang, Sheng F. Oon, Rajeev Ravi, Daniel Moon, Declan G. Murphy, Renu S. Eapen, Marlon Perera, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Arun A. Azad, Sarat Chander, Mark Shaw, Nicholas Hardcastle, Shankar Siva
{"title":"Impact of the R.E.N.A.L. complexity score on outcomes of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma","authors":"Muhammad Ali, Mathias Bressel, David Chang, Sheng F. Oon, Rajeev Ravi, Daniel Moon, Declan G. Murphy, Renu S. Eapen, Marlon Perera, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Arun A. Azad, Sarat Chander, Mark Shaw, Nicholas Hardcastle, Shankar Siva","doi":"10.1111/bju.16843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of the R.E.N.A.L. ([R]adius, [E]xophytic/endophytic properties, [N]earness of tumour to the collecting system or sinus, [A]nterior/posterior descriptor, and [L]ocation relative to polar lines) nephrometry score (RNS) for outcomes following stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as the impact of tumour complexity on outcomes following nephron‐sparing SABR treatment is unclear.Patients and MethodsThis was a single institutional retrospective analysis of patients with primary RCC receiving SABR between 2012 and 2020. The primary outcome was the change in renal function post‐SABR, measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and the effect of baseline RNS on it was assessed using linear mixed models (LMMs).ResultsA total of 90 patients with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 77 (71–82) years and a median (IQR) follow‐up of 4.8 (2.8–7.8) years were included. In all, 52 patients (58%) had T1b disease, nine (10%) had T2 disease, and three (3%) had T3 disease. The median (IQR) maximum tumour size was 4.6 (2.1–8.4) cm. Most patients had moderate–complex renal tumours with a median (IQR) RNS of 9 (7–10). The baseline median eGFR was 53.6 mL/min/1.73 m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> (95% confidence interval [CI] 49.7–57.5 mL/min/1.73 m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>). The eGFR declined by −8.1 mL/min/1.73 m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> (95% CI −6.5 to −9.6 mL/min/1.73 m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) at 1 year. The <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> value for the post‐SABR eGFR trajectory according to baseline RNS was <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.06. Two patients (2.2%) underwent dialysis. Three patients (3.3%) experienced local progression. The 3‐ and 5‐year estimates for freedom from local failure were 97% (95% CI 89–99%), and 91% (95% CI 68–98%), respectively. Four (4.4%) patients experienced Grade 3 toxicities.ConclusionStereotactic ablative body radiotherapy is an effective treatment option, with acceptable decline in renal function and toxicity for medically inoperable patients with complex primary kidney tumours. The association between baseline RNS and renal function trajectories is worthy of further investigation.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16843","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of the R.E.N.A.L. ([R]adius, [E]xophytic/endophytic properties, [N]earness of tumour to the collecting system or sinus, [A]nterior/posterior descriptor, and [L]ocation relative to polar lines) nephrometry score (RNS) for outcomes following stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as the impact of tumour complexity on outcomes following nephron‐sparing SABR treatment is unclear.Patients and MethodsThis was a single institutional retrospective analysis of patients with primary RCC receiving SABR between 2012 and 2020. The primary outcome was the change in renal function post‐SABR, measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and the effect of baseline RNS on it was assessed using linear mixed models (LMMs).ResultsA total of 90 patients with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 77 (71–82) years and a median (IQR) follow‐up of 4.8 (2.8–7.8) years were included. In all, 52 patients (58%) had T1b disease, nine (10%) had T2 disease, and three (3%) had T3 disease. The median (IQR) maximum tumour size was 4.6 (2.1–8.4) cm. Most patients had moderate–complex renal tumours with a median (IQR) RNS of 9 (7–10). The baseline median eGFR was 53.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 49.7–57.5 mL/min/1.73 m2). The eGFR declined by −8.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI −6.5 to −9.6 mL/min/1.73 m2) at 1 year. The P value for the post‐SABR eGFR trajectory according to baseline RNS was P = 0.06. Two patients (2.2%) underwent dialysis. Three patients (3.3%) experienced local progression. The 3‐ and 5‐year estimates for freedom from local failure were 97% (95% CI 89–99%), and 91% (95% CI 68–98%), respectively. Four (4.4%) patients experienced Grade 3 toxicities.ConclusionStereotactic ablative body radiotherapy is an effective treatment option, with acceptable decline in renal function and toxicity for medically inoperable patients with complex primary kidney tumours. The association between baseline RNS and renal function trajectories is worthy of further investigation.
期刊介绍:
BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.