Cost-Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in Taiwan Based on Clinical Evidence and Regional Event Rates

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Hui-Chun Huang, Khoa N. Cao, Anne M. Ryschon, Kee-Wong Phay, Tzung-Dau Wang, Jan B. Pietzsch
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in Taiwan Based on Clinical Evidence and Regional Event Rates","authors":"Hui-Chun Huang,&nbsp;Khoa N. Cao,&nbsp;Anne M. Ryschon,&nbsp;Kee-Wong Phay,&nbsp;Tzung-Dau Wang,&nbsp;Jan B. Pietzsch","doi":"10.1111/jch.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) is recognized as an adjunct therapy for hypertension. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of RF RDN for the Taiwanese healthcare system using results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED randomized, sham-controlled trial. A decision-analytic Markov model projected clinical events, costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for RF RDN versus standard-of-care (SoC) in an Asian population context. Clinical event risk reductions from treatment effects on office-based systolic blood pressure (oSBP) were derived from a meta-regression study of 47 hypertension trials. SPYRAL HTN-ON MED demographics and results (oSBP reduction of 4.9 mmHg against sham) were used in the base case analysis. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was assessed against a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of three million Taiwan dollars (TWD) per QALY gained. Compared to SoC, RF RDN was projected to reduce clinical events, with relative risks of 0.80, 0.88, and 0.74 for stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and heart failure (HF), respectively. The incremental costs and QALYs were 216 381 TWD and 0.25, respectively, resulting in an ICER of 850 932 TWD per QALY gained. The ICER was cost-effective across a broad range of uncertainty analyses. Model-based projections adjusted for East Asian event rates suggest RF RDN may significantly reduce events, making it a cost-effective intervention in the Taiwanese healthcare system for treating uncontrolled hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70090","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) is recognized as an adjunct therapy for hypertension. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of RF RDN for the Taiwanese healthcare system using results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED randomized, sham-controlled trial. A decision-analytic Markov model projected clinical events, costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for RF RDN versus standard-of-care (SoC) in an Asian population context. Clinical event risk reductions from treatment effects on office-based systolic blood pressure (oSBP) were derived from a meta-regression study of 47 hypertension trials. SPYRAL HTN-ON MED demographics and results (oSBP reduction of 4.9 mmHg against sham) were used in the base case analysis. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was assessed against a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of three million Taiwan dollars (TWD) per QALY gained. Compared to SoC, RF RDN was projected to reduce clinical events, with relative risks of 0.80, 0.88, and 0.74 for stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and heart failure (HF), respectively. The incremental costs and QALYs were 216 381 TWD and 0.25, respectively, resulting in an ICER of 850 932 TWD per QALY gained. The ICER was cost-effective across a broad range of uncertainty analyses. Model-based projections adjusted for East Asian event rates suggest RF RDN may significantly reduce events, making it a cost-effective intervention in the Taiwanese healthcare system for treating uncontrolled hypertension.

Abstract Image

基于临床证据和区域事件发生率的台湾射频肾去神经的成本-效果
射频肾去神经(RF RDN)被认为是高血压的辅助治疗方法。本研究利用SPYRAL HTN-ON MED随机、假对照试验的结果,评估射频RDN在台湾医疗保健系统中的成本效益。决策分析马尔可夫模型预测了亚洲人群中射频RDN与标准护理(SoC)的临床事件、成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。对办公室收缩压(oSBP)的治疗效果降低了临床事件风险,这是一项来自47项高血压试验的荟萃回归研究。在基本病例分析中使用了SPYRAL HTN-ON MED人口统计数据和结果(与假手术相比oSBP降低4.9 mmHg)。增量成本效益比(ICER)是根据每个获得的质量质量的支付意愿(WTP)阈值300万台币(TWD)来评估的。与SoC相比,RF RDN预计可减少临床事件,卒中、心肌梗死(MI)和心力衰竭(HF)的相对风险分别为0.80、0.88和0.74。增量成本和QALY分别为216 381 TWD和0.25 TWD,每获得一个QALY, ICER为850 932 TWD。ICER在广泛的不确定性分析中具有成本效益。根据东亚事件率调整的基于模型的预测表明,RF RDN可以显著减少事件,使其成为台湾医疗保健系统中治疗不受控制的高血压的一种具有成本效益的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信