Agent-based modeling of firm's heterogeneous preferences: Implications for trading and technology adoption in electricity-carbon markets

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Mei Wang , Songyuan Liu , Jiageng Liu , Zhengjun Li
{"title":"Agent-based modeling of firm's heterogeneous preferences: Implications for trading and technology adoption in electricity-carbon markets","authors":"Mei Wang ,&nbsp;Songyuan Liu ,&nbsp;Jiageng Liu ,&nbsp;Zhengjun Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Firm preference and behavior significantly influence carbon market performance and emission reduction efficiency. This paper develops an electricity‑carbon coupled market model, integrating Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), to analyze the trading and investment behavior of heterogeneous firms in carbon markets. Using calibrated data from China's energy markets, the study uncovers four key findings. First, “compliance-based trading” behavior drives carbon price and volume surges near compliance deadlines. Second, large firms, with financial and technical advantages, act as first movers in adopting low-carbon technologies. Third, longer payback period reduces carbon prices but promote technological innovation, while stronger technology-oriented expectations boost trading activity, prices, and innovation. Fourth, trading preferences shape market outcomes: arbitrage firms increase short-term price volatility, risk-hedge firms stabilize markets and lead in innovation, and speculative firms strike a balance between price impacts and moderate innovation. Policy recommendations include extending payback period to ease financial pressures and encourage technology diffusion, leveraging large firms' resources while supporting smaller firms with fiscal incentives, and regulating arbitrage behavior during compliance periods to stabilize carbon markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 108688"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325005158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Firm preference and behavior significantly influence carbon market performance and emission reduction efficiency. This paper develops an electricity‑carbon coupled market model, integrating Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), to analyze the trading and investment behavior of heterogeneous firms in carbon markets. Using calibrated data from China's energy markets, the study uncovers four key findings. First, “compliance-based trading” behavior drives carbon price and volume surges near compliance deadlines. Second, large firms, with financial and technical advantages, act as first movers in adopting low-carbon technologies. Third, longer payback period reduces carbon prices but promote technological innovation, while stronger technology-oriented expectations boost trading activity, prices, and innovation. Fourth, trading preferences shape market outcomes: arbitrage firms increase short-term price volatility, risk-hedge firms stabilize markets and lead in innovation, and speculative firms strike a balance between price impacts and moderate innovation. Policy recommendations include extending payback period to ease financial pressures and encourage technology diffusion, leveraging large firms' resources while supporting smaller firms with fiscal incentives, and regulating arbitrage behavior during compliance periods to stabilize carbon markets.
基于代理的企业异质偏好模型:对电力-碳市场交易和技术采用的影响
企业偏好和行为显著影响碳市场绩效和减排效率。本文将基于智能体的建模(ABM)和多智能体强化学习(MARL)相结合,建立了一个电碳耦合市场模型,用于分析异质性企业在碳市场中的交易和投资行为。利用中国能源市场的校准数据,该研究揭示了四个关键发现。首先,“基于合规的交易”行为推动碳价和碳量在合规截止日期附近飙升。其次,具有资金和技术优势的大企业是采用低碳技术的先行者。第三,更长的投资回收期降低了碳价格,但促进了技术创新,而更强的技术导向预期促进了交易活动、价格和创新。第四,交易偏好塑造了市场结果:套利公司增加了短期价格波动,风险对冲公司稳定市场并引领创新,投机公司在价格影响和适度创新之间取得平衡。政策建议包括延长投资回收期以缓解资金压力并鼓励技术扩散,利用大企业的资源同时以财政激励支持小企业,以及在合规期间规范套利行为以稳定碳市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信