Mei Wang , Songyuan Liu , Jiageng Liu , Zhengjun Li
{"title":"Agent-based modeling of firm's heterogeneous preferences: Implications for trading and technology adoption in electricity-carbon markets","authors":"Mei Wang , Songyuan Liu , Jiageng Liu , Zhengjun Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Firm preference and behavior significantly influence carbon market performance and emission reduction efficiency. This paper develops an electricity‑carbon coupled market model, integrating Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), to analyze the trading and investment behavior of heterogeneous firms in carbon markets. Using calibrated data from China's energy markets, the study uncovers four key findings. First, “compliance-based trading” behavior drives carbon price and volume surges near compliance deadlines. Second, large firms, with financial and technical advantages, act as first movers in adopting low-carbon technologies. Third, longer payback period reduces carbon prices but promote technological innovation, while stronger technology-oriented expectations boost trading activity, prices, and innovation. Fourth, trading preferences shape market outcomes: arbitrage firms increase short-term price volatility, risk-hedge firms stabilize markets and lead in innovation, and speculative firms strike a balance between price impacts and moderate innovation. Policy recommendations include extending payback period to ease financial pressures and encourage technology diffusion, leveraging large firms' resources while supporting smaller firms with fiscal incentives, and regulating arbitrage behavior during compliance periods to stabilize carbon markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 108688"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325005158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Firm preference and behavior significantly influence carbon market performance and emission reduction efficiency. This paper develops an electricity‑carbon coupled market model, integrating Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), to analyze the trading and investment behavior of heterogeneous firms in carbon markets. Using calibrated data from China's energy markets, the study uncovers four key findings. First, “compliance-based trading” behavior drives carbon price and volume surges near compliance deadlines. Second, large firms, with financial and technical advantages, act as first movers in adopting low-carbon technologies. Third, longer payback period reduces carbon prices but promote technological innovation, while stronger technology-oriented expectations boost trading activity, prices, and innovation. Fourth, trading preferences shape market outcomes: arbitrage firms increase short-term price volatility, risk-hedge firms stabilize markets and lead in innovation, and speculative firms strike a balance between price impacts and moderate innovation. Policy recommendations include extending payback period to ease financial pressures and encourage technology diffusion, leveraging large firms' resources while supporting smaller firms with fiscal incentives, and regulating arbitrage behavior during compliance periods to stabilize carbon markets.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.