Effects of age on the strategic control of recollected content as reflected by modulation of neural correlates of scene retrieval

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Marianne de Chastelaine , Sabina Srokova , Sarah Monier , Joshua M. Olivier , Michael D. Rugg
{"title":"Effects of age on the strategic control of recollected content as reflected by modulation of neural correlates of scene retrieval","authors":"Marianne de Chastelaine ,&nbsp;Sabina Srokova ,&nbsp;Sarah Monier ,&nbsp;Joshua M. Olivier ,&nbsp;Michael D. Rugg","doi":"10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2025.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A previous study employing fMRI measures of retrieval-related neural selectivity reported that young, but not older, adults employ ‘retrieval gating’ to attenuate aspects of an episodic memory that are irrelevant to the retrieval goal. We examined whether the weak memories of the older adults in that study rendered goal-irrelevant memories insufficiently intrusive to motivate retrieval gating. Young and older participants studied words superimposed on rural or urban scenes, or on scrambled backgrounds. To strengthen memory for background information, word-image pairs were studied twice, initially centrally, and then in one of three locations. During scanning, one retrieval test probed memory for the test words’ studied backgrounds and another test assessed memory for their location. Background memory performance was markedly higher than in the prior study. Retrieval gating was examined in two scene-selective regions of interest, the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and the medial place area (MPA). In the background task, robust scene-specific retrieval effects were identified in both age groups in both ROIs. These effects were attenuated (‘gated’) in the location task in the young age group only, replicating the prior finding. The results did not differ when the two groups were sub-sampled to match strength of scene-specific retrieval effects when scene information was goal relevant. The findings indicate that older adults’ failure to gate goal-irrelevant scene information does not reflect age differences in memory strength and may instead reflect an age-related decline in top-down inhibitory control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19110,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Aging","volume":"154 ","pages":"Pages 1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197458025001022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A previous study employing fMRI measures of retrieval-related neural selectivity reported that young, but not older, adults employ ‘retrieval gating’ to attenuate aspects of an episodic memory that are irrelevant to the retrieval goal. We examined whether the weak memories of the older adults in that study rendered goal-irrelevant memories insufficiently intrusive to motivate retrieval gating. Young and older participants studied words superimposed on rural or urban scenes, or on scrambled backgrounds. To strengthen memory for background information, word-image pairs were studied twice, initially centrally, and then in one of three locations. During scanning, one retrieval test probed memory for the test words’ studied backgrounds and another test assessed memory for their location. Background memory performance was markedly higher than in the prior study. Retrieval gating was examined in two scene-selective regions of interest, the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and the medial place area (MPA). In the background task, robust scene-specific retrieval effects were identified in both age groups in both ROIs. These effects were attenuated (‘gated’) in the location task in the young age group only, replicating the prior finding. The results did not differ when the two groups were sub-sampled to match strength of scene-specific retrieval effects when scene information was goal relevant. The findings indicate that older adults’ failure to gate goal-irrelevant scene information does not reflect age differences in memory strength and may instead reflect an age-related decline in top-down inhibitory control.
年龄对情景检索相关神经调节对记忆内容策略控制的影响
先前一项使用功能磁共振成像测量检索相关神经选择性的研究报告称,年轻人(而不是老年人)使用“检索门控”来减弱与检索目标无关的情景记忆方面。我们检查了在该研究中,老年人的弱记忆是否使与目标无关的记忆没有足够的侵入性来激发检索门控。年轻和年长的参与者研究了叠加在乡村或城市场景上的单词,或者是杂乱的背景。为了加强对背景信息的记忆,研究人员对单词-图像对进行了两次研究,首先集中研究,然后在三个地点中的一个进行研究。在扫描过程中,一项检索测试考察了对测试单词学习背景的记忆,另一项测试评估了对测试单词位置的记忆。背景记忆表现明显高于前期研究。检索门控在两个感兴趣的场景选择区域,海马旁位置区(PPA)和内侧位置区(MPA)进行了研究。在背景任务中,在两个roi中,两个年龄组的场景特定检索效果都很明显。这些影响仅在年轻年龄组的定位任务中减弱(“门控”),重复了先前的发现。当场景信息与目标相关时,对两组进行亚采样以匹配场景特定检索效果的强度,结果没有差异。研究结果表明,老年人对与目标无关的场景信息的记忆失败并不反映记忆强度的年龄差异,而是反映了自上而下抑制控制的年龄相关下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Aging
Neurobiology of Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
225
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Neurobiology of Aging publishes the results of studies in behavior, biochemistry, cell biology, endocrinology, molecular biology, morphology, neurology, neuropathology, pharmacology, physiology and protein chemistry in which the primary emphasis involves mechanisms of nervous system changes with age or diseases associated with age. Reviews and primary research articles are included, occasionally accompanied by open peer commentary. Letters to the Editor and brief communications are also acceptable. Brief reports of highly time-sensitive material are usually treated as rapid communications in which case editorial review is completed within six weeks and publication scheduled for the next available issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信