Incorporating dynamic crop area in hydrological model to address interannual variability in water withdrawal and implication of sustainable water management

IF 6.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Muhammad Umer , Naota Hanasaki , Saritha Padiyedath Gopalan , Zeshan Ali , Taikan Oki
{"title":"Incorporating dynamic crop area in hydrological model to address interannual variability in water withdrawal and implication of sustainable water management","authors":"Muhammad Umer ,&nbsp;Naota Hanasaki ,&nbsp;Saritha Padiyedath Gopalan ,&nbsp;Zeshan Ali ,&nbsp;Taikan Oki","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water security assessments are critical for policymakers in agriculture-dominated regions, where water demand and withdrawals continuously change due to crop area variations driven by farmers’ decisions. However, hydrological models often assume fixed crop areas, resulting in unrealistic estimates of water demand, withdrawals, and related scarcity. This study investigates the impact of interannual variations in crop areas on agricultural water withdrawals within the IRB in Pakistan, by incorporating dynamic crop area based on hydro-meteorological factors in the H08 hydrological model. Data analysis revealed a strong lagged correlation between river water availability and crop areas, highlighting river flow as a primary driver of farmers’ crop area decisions, followed by rainfall with a moderate correlation. Based on these findings, three simulation cases were tested for altering crop areas: a fixed crop area case (where crop area remains unchanged), a rain-based case (crop area changes in response to previous years’ rainfall), and a river-based case (crop area changes based on previous years’ river water availability). The results were compared with observed withdrawals, and the river-based case outperformed others across all studied performance indices (MAE, RMSE, R<sup>2</sup>), highlighting the importance of river flows in incorporating crop area adjustments. Although moderately effective, the rain-based case also captured some interannual variability. In contrast, the fixed crop area case exhibited the weakest performance, emphasizing the need to incorporate dynamic crop area adjustments in hydrological assessments. This approach offers policymakers more accurate assessments to better address water shortages, support sustainable water management, and improve crop planning strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"661 ","pages":"Article 133778"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425011163","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water security assessments are critical for policymakers in agriculture-dominated regions, where water demand and withdrawals continuously change due to crop area variations driven by farmers’ decisions. However, hydrological models often assume fixed crop areas, resulting in unrealistic estimates of water demand, withdrawals, and related scarcity. This study investigates the impact of interannual variations in crop areas on agricultural water withdrawals within the IRB in Pakistan, by incorporating dynamic crop area based on hydro-meteorological factors in the H08 hydrological model. Data analysis revealed a strong lagged correlation between river water availability and crop areas, highlighting river flow as a primary driver of farmers’ crop area decisions, followed by rainfall with a moderate correlation. Based on these findings, three simulation cases were tested for altering crop areas: a fixed crop area case (where crop area remains unchanged), a rain-based case (crop area changes in response to previous years’ rainfall), and a river-based case (crop area changes based on previous years’ river water availability). The results were compared with observed withdrawals, and the river-based case outperformed others across all studied performance indices (MAE, RMSE, R2), highlighting the importance of river flows in incorporating crop area adjustments. Although moderately effective, the rain-based case also captured some interannual variability. In contrast, the fixed crop area case exhibited the weakest performance, emphasizing the need to incorporate dynamic crop area adjustments in hydrological assessments. This approach offers policymakers more accurate assessments to better address water shortages, support sustainable water management, and improve crop planning strategies.
将动态作物面积纳入水文模型,以解决取水的年际变化和可持续水管理的含义
在以农业为主导的地区,水安全评估对决策者来说至关重要,在这些地区,由于农民的决策驱动的作物面积变化,水的需求和取水量不断变化。然而,水文模型通常假设固定的作物面积,导致对水需求、取水和相关稀缺的不现实估计。本研究通过在H08水文模型中纳入基于水文气象因子的动态作物面积,研究了作物面积年际变化对巴基斯坦中部地区农业取水量的影响。数据分析显示,河流可用水量与作物面积之间存在很强的滞后相关性,强调河流流量是农民作物面积决策的主要驱动因素,其次是降雨量,相关性中等。基于这些发现,我们测试了三种改变作物面积的模拟情况:固定作物面积情况(作物面积保持不变),基于降雨的情况(作物面积根据前几年的降雨量变化),以及基于河流的情况(作物面积根据前几年的河流可用水量变化)。结果与观测到的提取量进行了比较,发现基于河流的案例在所有研究的绩效指标(MAE、RMSE、R2)上都优于其他案例,突出了河流流量在纳入作物面积调整中的重要性。虽然效果中等,但基于降雨的案例也捕捉到了一些年际变化。相比之下,固定作物面积的情况表现出最弱的表现,强调需要在水文评估中纳入动态作物面积调整。这种方法为决策者提供了更准确的评估,以更好地解决水资源短缺问题,支持可持续水资源管理,改进作物规划战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信