Incorporating dynamic crop area in hydrological model to address interannual variability in water withdrawal and implication of sustainable water management
Muhammad Umer , Naota Hanasaki , Saritha Padiyedath Gopalan , Zeshan Ali , Taikan Oki
{"title":"Incorporating dynamic crop area in hydrological model to address interannual variability in water withdrawal and implication of sustainable water management","authors":"Muhammad Umer , Naota Hanasaki , Saritha Padiyedath Gopalan , Zeshan Ali , Taikan Oki","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water security assessments are critical for policymakers in agriculture-dominated regions, where water demand and withdrawals continuously change due to crop area variations driven by farmers’ decisions. However, hydrological models often assume fixed crop areas, resulting in unrealistic estimates of water demand, withdrawals, and related scarcity. This study investigates the impact of interannual variations in crop areas on agricultural water withdrawals within the IRB in Pakistan, by incorporating dynamic crop area based on hydro-meteorological factors in the H08 hydrological model. Data analysis revealed a strong lagged correlation between river water availability and crop areas, highlighting river flow as a primary driver of farmers’ crop area decisions, followed by rainfall with a moderate correlation. Based on these findings, three simulation cases were tested for altering crop areas: a fixed crop area case (where crop area remains unchanged), a rain-based case (crop area changes in response to previous years’ rainfall), and a river-based case (crop area changes based on previous years’ river water availability). The results were compared with observed withdrawals, and the river-based case outperformed others across all studied performance indices (MAE, RMSE, R<sup>2</sup>), highlighting the importance of river flows in incorporating crop area adjustments. Although moderately effective, the rain-based case also captured some interannual variability. In contrast, the fixed crop area case exhibited the weakest performance, emphasizing the need to incorporate dynamic crop area adjustments in hydrological assessments. This approach offers policymakers more accurate assessments to better address water shortages, support sustainable water management, and improve crop planning strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"661 ","pages":"Article 133778"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425011163","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Water security assessments are critical for policymakers in agriculture-dominated regions, where water demand and withdrawals continuously change due to crop area variations driven by farmers’ decisions. However, hydrological models often assume fixed crop areas, resulting in unrealistic estimates of water demand, withdrawals, and related scarcity. This study investigates the impact of interannual variations in crop areas on agricultural water withdrawals within the IRB in Pakistan, by incorporating dynamic crop area based on hydro-meteorological factors in the H08 hydrological model. Data analysis revealed a strong lagged correlation between river water availability and crop areas, highlighting river flow as a primary driver of farmers’ crop area decisions, followed by rainfall with a moderate correlation. Based on these findings, three simulation cases were tested for altering crop areas: a fixed crop area case (where crop area remains unchanged), a rain-based case (crop area changes in response to previous years’ rainfall), and a river-based case (crop area changes based on previous years’ river water availability). The results were compared with observed withdrawals, and the river-based case outperformed others across all studied performance indices (MAE, RMSE, R2), highlighting the importance of river flows in incorporating crop area adjustments. Although moderately effective, the rain-based case also captured some interannual variability. In contrast, the fixed crop area case exhibited the weakest performance, emphasizing the need to incorporate dynamic crop area adjustments in hydrological assessments. This approach offers policymakers more accurate assessments to better address water shortages, support sustainable water management, and improve crop planning strategies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.