Recycling, natural resource rents, and climate policy uncertainty: Impacts on material sustainability in the U.S.

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Hadi Esmaeilpour Moghadam, Arezou Karami
{"title":"Recycling, natural resource rents, and climate policy uncertainty: Impacts on material sustainability in the U.S.","authors":"Hadi Esmaeilpour Moghadam,&nbsp;Arezou Karami","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study looks at how recycling (RCY), natural resource rents (NRR), and uncertainty in climate policy (CPU) affect material sustainability in the United States, using the material footprint (MF) as the main measure. This research uses yearly data from 1990 to 2023 and applies quantile and threshold regression methods to assess how these factors affect the MF in the U.S., specifically including CPU. The empirical findings corroborate three principal hypotheses. Recycling markedly diminishes the material footprint, with more pronounced effects evident at elevated levels of material usage. Secondly, NRR positively impacts the MF, especially beyond a certain threshold, hence strengthening the dynamics of the \"resource curse.\" Third, CPU exacerbates the material footprint by compromising policy consistency and dissuading long-term investments in sustainability. Furthermore, we show that economic growth and urbanization enhance MF, highlighting the need for cohesive planning and resource-efficient urban development. These findings provide innovative policy insights for improving material sustainability and further the advancement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) and 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 101793"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25001567","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study looks at how recycling (RCY), natural resource rents (NRR), and uncertainty in climate policy (CPU) affect material sustainability in the United States, using the material footprint (MF) as the main measure. This research uses yearly data from 1990 to 2023 and applies quantile and threshold regression methods to assess how these factors affect the MF in the U.S., specifically including CPU. The empirical findings corroborate three principal hypotheses. Recycling markedly diminishes the material footprint, with more pronounced effects evident at elevated levels of material usage. Secondly, NRR positively impacts the MF, especially beyond a certain threshold, hence strengthening the dynamics of the "resource curse." Third, CPU exacerbates the material footprint by compromising policy consistency and dissuading long-term investments in sustainability. Furthermore, we show that economic growth and urbanization enhance MF, highlighting the need for cohesive planning and resource-efficient urban development. These findings provide innovative policy insights for improving material sustainability and further the advancement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) and 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production).
回收、自然资源租金和气候政策的不确定性:对美国材料可持续性的影响
本研究着眼于回收(RCY)、自然资源租金(NRR)和气候政策的不确定性(CPU)如何影响美国的材料可持续性,使用材料足迹(MF)作为主要衡量标准。本研究使用1990年至2023年的年度数据,并应用分位数和阈值回归方法来评估这些因素如何影响美国的MF,特别是包括CPU。实证研究结果证实了三个主要假设。回收明显减少了材料足迹,在材料使用水平升高时效果更明显。其次,NRR对MF产生积极影响,特别是超过一定阈值后,从而强化了“资源诅咒”的动态性。第三,CPU通过损害政策一致性和阻碍可持续性的长期投资而加剧了材料足迹。此外,我们还发现经济增长和城市化会增强MF,强调了凝聚力规划和资源节约型城市发展的必要性。这些发现为提高材料可持续性和进一步推进可持续发展目标(sdg) 11(可持续城市和社区)和12(负责任的消费和生产)提供了创新的政策见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信