Social equity indicators for a Blue Economy: Guidelines for application

IF 3.7 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
A.M. Cisneros-Montemayor , H. Breakey , S. Bossier , F. Croft , I. Issifu , J. Keefer , G.G. Singh , M. Voyer , Y. Ota
{"title":"Social equity indicators for a Blue Economy: Guidelines for application","authors":"A.M. Cisneros-Montemayor ,&nbsp;H. Breakey ,&nbsp;S. Bossier ,&nbsp;F. Croft ,&nbsp;I. Issifu ,&nbsp;J. Keefer ,&nbsp;G.G. Singh ,&nbsp;M. Voyer ,&nbsp;Y. Ota","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social equity goals are specifically stated in most new ocean management and development plans, notably those aligned with a Blue Economy that recognizes the significant and rising inequities across ocean spaces and sectors. However, the deeper significance of social equity has still not been fully integrated in policy and management practices, which often ask why it is relevant and how it can be measured in ways comparable to more familiar ecological and economic indicators. We propose a theoretical and practical framework (including examples of indicators) that builds on key concepts in critical environmental justice, antiracist and decolonial scholarships: difference (not all groups have equal opportunity, so interventions must serve the least well-off); intersectionality (people and groups have multiple self-identities); power relations (colonization has entrenched an ‘us-vs-them’ mentality); and interest convergence (goals of marginalized groups are often only pursued if they benefit the powerful). These principles are contrasted with three categories of indicators that sequentially build toward evaluating social equity goals: total outputs (what and how much do ocean sectors contribute or impact); disaggregated impacts (who shares in specific benefits and costs); and equity actions (specific actions taken to implement equitable processes and outcomes). Local, national, and intergovernmental evaluation plans can use these guidelines to clarify what aspects of development are being reflected in indicators, and what indicators need to be added for a fuller picture of outcomes that support the interests of marginalized populations across the world’s oceans.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 106815"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social equity goals are specifically stated in most new ocean management and development plans, notably those aligned with a Blue Economy that recognizes the significant and rising inequities across ocean spaces and sectors. However, the deeper significance of social equity has still not been fully integrated in policy and management practices, which often ask why it is relevant and how it can be measured in ways comparable to more familiar ecological and economic indicators. We propose a theoretical and practical framework (including examples of indicators) that builds on key concepts in critical environmental justice, antiracist and decolonial scholarships: difference (not all groups have equal opportunity, so interventions must serve the least well-off); intersectionality (people and groups have multiple self-identities); power relations (colonization has entrenched an ‘us-vs-them’ mentality); and interest convergence (goals of marginalized groups are often only pursued if they benefit the powerful). These principles are contrasted with three categories of indicators that sequentially build toward evaluating social equity goals: total outputs (what and how much do ocean sectors contribute or impact); disaggregated impacts (who shares in specific benefits and costs); and equity actions (specific actions taken to implement equitable processes and outcomes). Local, national, and intergovernmental evaluation plans can use these guidelines to clarify what aspects of development are being reflected in indicators, and what indicators need to be added for a fuller picture of outcomes that support the interests of marginalized populations across the world’s oceans.
蓝色经济的社会公平指标:应用指南
大多数新的海洋管理和发展计划都明确提出了社会公平目标,特别是那些与蓝色经济相一致的计划,该计划认识到海洋空间和部门之间存在着日益严重的不平等现象。然而,社会公平的深层意义仍未充分纳入政策和管理实践,这些实践经常提出这样的问题:为什么社会公平是相关的,以及如何以与更熟悉的生态和经济指标相比较的方式来衡量社会公平。我们提出了一个理论和实践框架(包括指标示例),该框架建立在关键环境正义,反种族主义和非殖民奖学金的关键概念之上:差异(并非所有群体都有平等的机会,因此干预措施必须服务于最不富裕的群体);交叉性(个人和群体具有多重自我身份);权力关系(殖民根深蒂固地形成了“我们对他们”的心态);利益趋同(边缘化群体的目标往往只有在有利于权势者的情况下才会被追求)。这些原则与为评价社会公平目标而依次建立的三类指标形成对比:总产出(海洋部门贡献或影响的内容和程度);分类影响(谁分担具体利益和成本);公平行动(为实现公平的过程和结果而采取的具体行动)。地方、国家和政府间评估计划可以利用这些准则来澄清指标反映了发展的哪些方面,以及需要增加哪些指标,以便更全面地了解支持世界各大洋边缘人口利益的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信