Genomic profiling of primary tumor and lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer: prospective cohort study within TAXIS (OPBC-03, SAKK 23/16, IBCSG 57–18, ABCSG-53, GBG 101)
Michael Knauer , Daniel Egle , Stefanie Hayoz , Ákos Sávolt , Christoph Tausch , Susanne Bucher , Colin Simonson , Rok Satler , Jörg Heil , Inga Bekes , Vesna Bjelic-Radisic , William Audeh , Giang Thanh Lam , Andrea Menicucci , Simone Muenst , Valerijus Ostapenko , Christian Kurzeder , Martin Heidinger , Walter P. Weber
{"title":"Genomic profiling of primary tumor and lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer: prospective cohort study within TAXIS (OPBC-03, SAKK 23/16, IBCSG 57–18, ABCSG-53, GBG 101)","authors":"Michael Knauer , Daniel Egle , Stefanie Hayoz , Ákos Sávolt , Christoph Tausch , Susanne Bucher , Colin Simonson , Rok Satler , Jörg Heil , Inga Bekes , Vesna Bjelic-Radisic , William Audeh , Giang Thanh Lam , Andrea Menicucci , Simone Muenst , Valerijus Ostapenko , Christian Kurzeder , Martin Heidinger , Walter P. Weber","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Genomic tests informing systemic therapy recommendations for breast cancer (BC) were developed and validated on primary tumor (PT) tissue. Agreement of genomic tests between the PT and matched lymph node metastases (LNm) in patients with BC is currently unclear, which limits their use in nodal tissue.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prespecified study within the international phase III TAXIS trial (NCT03513614). Tissue from PT and matched LNm were assessed with the primary objective of comparing genomic recurrence risk and subtypes. Clinical risk was assessed using the Adjuvant!Online tool and clinical subtypes were determined based on hormone receptor and Her2 testing. Agreement was assessed using Cohen’s Kappa (Κ).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty-nine patients with stage II/III BC from 26 European centers were included. Median age was 63 years (range 50–72). Agreement in genomic risk between the PT and LNm was found in 84.3 % (Κ=0.64). However, 15.6 % exhibited genomic high risk in the LNm and low risk in the PT, while 16.0 % demonstrated low risk in the LNm and high risk in the PT. Genomic subtypes of PT and LNm showed disagreement in 17.1 % of patients with luminal BC (Κ=0.70). 96.5 % of patients were clinically categorized as high risk, whereas genomically, 25.6 % of them were classified as low risk in the LNm (Κ=0.17) and 31.7 % in the PT (Κ=0.13). Genomic subtyping reclassified 35.5 % of the clinically luminal tumor subtypes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Disagreement in genomically estimated risk exists in over 15 % of patients, potentially leading to over- or undertreatment. Consequently, the applicability of genomic tests in LNm remains controversial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"225 ","pages":"Article 115585"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804925003673","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Genomic tests informing systemic therapy recommendations for breast cancer (BC) were developed and validated on primary tumor (PT) tissue. Agreement of genomic tests between the PT and matched lymph node metastases (LNm) in patients with BC is currently unclear, which limits their use in nodal tissue.
Methods
Prespecified study within the international phase III TAXIS trial (NCT03513614). Tissue from PT and matched LNm were assessed with the primary objective of comparing genomic recurrence risk and subtypes. Clinical risk was assessed using the Adjuvant!Online tool and clinical subtypes were determined based on hormone receptor and Her2 testing. Agreement was assessed using Cohen’s Kappa (Κ).
Results
Eighty-nine patients with stage II/III BC from 26 European centers were included. Median age was 63 years (range 50–72). Agreement in genomic risk between the PT and LNm was found in 84.3 % (Κ=0.64). However, 15.6 % exhibited genomic high risk in the LNm and low risk in the PT, while 16.0 % demonstrated low risk in the LNm and high risk in the PT. Genomic subtypes of PT and LNm showed disagreement in 17.1 % of patients with luminal BC (Κ=0.70). 96.5 % of patients were clinically categorized as high risk, whereas genomically, 25.6 % of them were classified as low risk in the LNm (Κ=0.17) and 31.7 % in the PT (Κ=0.13). Genomic subtyping reclassified 35.5 % of the clinically luminal tumor subtypes.
Conclusion
Disagreement in genomically estimated risk exists in over 15 % of patients, potentially leading to over- or undertreatment. Consequently, the applicability of genomic tests in LNm remains controversial.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Cancer (EJC) serves as a comprehensive platform integrating preclinical, digital, translational, and clinical research across the spectrum of cancer. From epidemiology, carcinogenesis, and biology to groundbreaking innovations in cancer treatment and patient care, the journal covers a wide array of topics. We publish original research, reviews, previews, editorial comments, and correspondence, fostering dialogue and advancement in the fight against cancer. Join us in our mission to drive progress and improve outcomes in cancer research and patient care.