Variegated decoupling: Australian firm strategies in the lithium global production network

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Eli Hayes , Neil M. Coe , Lian Sinclair
{"title":"Variegated decoupling: Australian firm strategies in the lithium global production network","authors":"Eli Hayes ,&nbsp;Neil M. Coe ,&nbsp;Lian Sinclair","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since 2020, lithium has rapidly risen to prominence as a ‘critical mineral’ for the global energy transition, given its essential role in both battery electric vehicles and grid-scale storage. While 33 % of global lithium is mined in Australia (as the mineral spodumene), making it the world’s largest raw material supplier, over 97 % of this is refined in China. At the same time, with a general deterioration of relations between China and ‘The West’, pressure has been growing to reduce or eliminate China’s role in Western supply chains. Beyond this general impulse, however, there lies a huge degree of variation, at the firm level, in the extent to which lithium production and trade is being reconfigured in response to these geopolitical dynamics. In this paper we deploy a global production network (GPN)-inspired analysis to interrogate these variations. Using a new dataset of contracts negotiated by Australian lithium firms, our analysis explores the impact of geopolitical pressures on the strategies of lithium firms in Australia and Sino-Australian linkages in lithium. We parse a range of different corporate strategies shaped by the extent to which firms are seeking to move downstream into processing activities and/or decouple from Chinese networks, enabling more nuanced understandings of the links between shifting geopolitical contexts and production network-level dynamics. Overall, our analysis explains why, rather than following a straightforward decoupling path, Australian and Chinese firms are likely to maintain relationships through trade and investment in lithium mining and refining at least until altered economic opportunities or geopolitical pressures develop.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 101692"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25000814","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2020, lithium has rapidly risen to prominence as a ‘critical mineral’ for the global energy transition, given its essential role in both battery electric vehicles and grid-scale storage. While 33 % of global lithium is mined in Australia (as the mineral spodumene), making it the world’s largest raw material supplier, over 97 % of this is refined in China. At the same time, with a general deterioration of relations between China and ‘The West’, pressure has been growing to reduce or eliminate China’s role in Western supply chains. Beyond this general impulse, however, there lies a huge degree of variation, at the firm level, in the extent to which lithium production and trade is being reconfigured in response to these geopolitical dynamics. In this paper we deploy a global production network (GPN)-inspired analysis to interrogate these variations. Using a new dataset of contracts negotiated by Australian lithium firms, our analysis explores the impact of geopolitical pressures on the strategies of lithium firms in Australia and Sino-Australian linkages in lithium. We parse a range of different corporate strategies shaped by the extent to which firms are seeking to move downstream into processing activities and/or decouple from Chinese networks, enabling more nuanced understandings of the links between shifting geopolitical contexts and production network-level dynamics. Overall, our analysis explains why, rather than following a straightforward decoupling path, Australian and Chinese firms are likely to maintain relationships through trade and investment in lithium mining and refining at least until altered economic opportunities or geopolitical pressures develop.
多样化的脱钩:澳大利亚公司在锂全球生产网络中的战略
自2020年以来,鉴于锂在电池电动汽车和电网规模存储中发挥的重要作用,它已迅速成为全球能源转型的“关键矿物”。虽然全球33%的锂是在澳大利亚开采的(作为矿物锂辉石),使其成为世界上最大的锂原料供应国,但超过97%的锂是在中国提炼的。与此同时,随着中国与“西方”关系的普遍恶化,减少或消除中国在西方供应链中的作用的压力越来越大。然而,除了这种普遍的推动力之外,在企业层面上,锂生产和贸易在多大程度上正在根据这些地缘政治动态进行重新配置,这存在着巨大的差异。在本文中,我们部署了一个全球生产网络(GPN)启发的分析来询问这些变化。利用澳大利亚锂企业谈判合同的新数据集,我们的分析探讨了地缘政治压力对澳大利亚锂企业战略的影响以及中澳在锂行业的联系。我们分析了一系列不同的企业战略,这些战略是根据企业寻求向下游转移到加工活动和/或与中国网络脱钩的程度而形成的,从而使我们能够更细致地理解不断变化的地缘政治背景与生产网络层面动态之间的联系。总的来说,我们的分析解释了为什么澳大利亚和中国公司可能会通过锂开采和精炼的贸易和投资来维持关系,而不是遵循直接的脱钩路径,至少在经济机会改变或地缘政治压力出现之前。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信