Failing together: Interactive patterns of problem-solving between youth and educators in informal stem environments

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Amber Simpson , Kelli Paul , Jacey Ruisi
{"title":"Failing together: Interactive patterns of problem-solving between youth and educators in informal stem environments","authors":"Amber Simpson ,&nbsp;Kelli Paul ,&nbsp;Jacey Ruisi","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>By incorporating learning-through-failure into facilitation, educators can offer learners the opportunity to promote their creativity and problem-solving skills. However, more research is needed to explore the implementation of this pedagogical approach. In this study, we utilized sequential analysis to examine common failure-based problem-solving patterns between educators and learners during informal STEM-based museum activities. Our data included 38 self-recorded videos of museum educators interacting with a learner or a group of learners in either a camp, drop-in exhibit, or a class setting. Through sequential analysis, the results demonstrate the joint nature of educator-learner interactions, while also emphasizing the educator's crucial role in guiding learners through the problem-solving cycle with pedagogical moves. Specifically, the results of this study highlight the importance of an educator’s use of ‘prompting’ to motivate the learners to engage in the cycle. Simultaneously, we observed how the collaborative nature of interactions, where educators and learners engaged in problem-solving roles, supported the learners in demonstrating creativity and agency. These findings contribute to both theory and practice by reframing failure as a co-constructed learning experience and identifying facilitation strategies that support creativity and problem-solving in informal STEM settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101905"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125001543","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By incorporating learning-through-failure into facilitation, educators can offer learners the opportunity to promote their creativity and problem-solving skills. However, more research is needed to explore the implementation of this pedagogical approach. In this study, we utilized sequential analysis to examine common failure-based problem-solving patterns between educators and learners during informal STEM-based museum activities. Our data included 38 self-recorded videos of museum educators interacting with a learner or a group of learners in either a camp, drop-in exhibit, or a class setting. Through sequential analysis, the results demonstrate the joint nature of educator-learner interactions, while also emphasizing the educator's crucial role in guiding learners through the problem-solving cycle with pedagogical moves. Specifically, the results of this study highlight the importance of an educator’s use of ‘prompting’ to motivate the learners to engage in the cycle. Simultaneously, we observed how the collaborative nature of interactions, where educators and learners engaged in problem-solving roles, supported the learners in demonstrating creativity and agency. These findings contribute to both theory and practice by reframing failure as a co-constructed learning experience and identifying facilitation strategies that support creativity and problem-solving in informal STEM settings.
一起失败:非正式stem环境中青年和教育工作者解决问题的互动模式
通过将失败中学习融入到促进中,教育者可以为学习者提供机会来提高他们的创造力和解决问题的能力。然而,需要更多的研究来探索这种教学方法的实施。在本研究中,我们利用序列分析来研究在非正式的stem博物馆活动中,教育者和学习者之间常见的基于失败的问题解决模式。我们的数据包括38个自录视频,这些视频是博物馆教育工作者在夏令营、临时展览或课堂环境中与一个或一组学习者互动的。通过序列分析,结果显示了教育者与学习者互动的共同性质,同时也强调了教育者在用教学动作引导学习者完成问题解决周期中的关键作用。具体来说,本研究的结果强调了教育工作者使用“提示”来激励学习者参与循环的重要性。同时,我们观察到互动的协作性质,即教育者和学习者参与解决问题的角色,如何支持学习者展示创造力和能动性。这些发现将失败重新定义为一种共同构建的学习经历,并确定了在非正式STEM环境中支持创造力和解决问题的促进策略,从而有助于理论和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信