Amelia R G Katz, Jason P Dubowsky, Julie M Huzzey, Zachary D McFarlane
{"title":"PS-9 Behavioral patterns at the feed bunk as indicators of feed efficiency in yearling Angus bulls","authors":"Amelia R G Katz, Jason P Dubowsky, Julie M Huzzey, Zachary D McFarlane","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf170.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between feed efficiency and feeding behavior in yearling Angus bulls. Bulls (n=214) were housed at Cal Poly Bull Test across 4 similar pens with 24-28 bulls/pen and a stocking rate of 6-7 bulls/feeder. Pens were balanced based on bull body weight at the start of the trial. This trial was repeated over two years with different sets of bulls. Feeders were filled twice daily at approximately 0630 h and 1700 h. Feed intake was monitored using an automated system (SmartFeed, C-Lock, Inc.) that recorded entry and exit times, as well as feed start and end weights. Data were processed to calculate for each bull: visit frequency, visit duration, total feeding time, and hourly feed intake during the 85-day trial. Bulls were retrospectively classified into high feed efficiency (HIFE) and low feed efficiency (LOFE) treatment groups based on their combined residual feed intake and feed:gain ratio ranks. Five bulls from each treatment group were selected per pen per year, resulting in 40 bulls per treatment for analyses. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure in SAS 9.4. The model included fixed effects of feed efficiency group, hour (0 to 24), and their interaction, with bull within pen as a random effect and hour treated as a repeated measure. LOFE bulls visited the feeder more frequently throughout the day (P = 0.0001) and consumed more feed overall (P < 0.0001), particularly around feed delivery times (P < 0.04). LOFE bulls spent more time feeding across the entire day (P = 0.002) but did not differ from HIFE bulls in visit duration per feeding event (P = 0.35). Differences in feeding patterns were most evident around feed delivery times, with LOFE bulls displaying longer feeding durations and higher feed intake during the hours surrounding both morning and evening feed deliveries (P < 0.03). These findings demonstrate distinct behavioral differences between feed efficiency groups, particularly around feeding times. Bulls with higher feed efficiency exhibited more restrained feeding behavior, characterized by fewer visits and reduced feed intake. This suggests that behavioral patterns at the feed bunk could serve as an important criterion in bull selection for feed efficiency improvement.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf170.187","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between feed efficiency and feeding behavior in yearling Angus bulls. Bulls (n=214) were housed at Cal Poly Bull Test across 4 similar pens with 24-28 bulls/pen and a stocking rate of 6-7 bulls/feeder. Pens were balanced based on bull body weight at the start of the trial. This trial was repeated over two years with different sets of bulls. Feeders were filled twice daily at approximately 0630 h and 1700 h. Feed intake was monitored using an automated system (SmartFeed, C-Lock, Inc.) that recorded entry and exit times, as well as feed start and end weights. Data were processed to calculate for each bull: visit frequency, visit duration, total feeding time, and hourly feed intake during the 85-day trial. Bulls were retrospectively classified into high feed efficiency (HIFE) and low feed efficiency (LOFE) treatment groups based on their combined residual feed intake and feed:gain ratio ranks. Five bulls from each treatment group were selected per pen per year, resulting in 40 bulls per treatment for analyses. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure in SAS 9.4. The model included fixed effects of feed efficiency group, hour (0 to 24), and their interaction, with bull within pen as a random effect and hour treated as a repeated measure. LOFE bulls visited the feeder more frequently throughout the day (P = 0.0001) and consumed more feed overall (P < 0.0001), particularly around feed delivery times (P < 0.04). LOFE bulls spent more time feeding across the entire day (P = 0.002) but did not differ from HIFE bulls in visit duration per feeding event (P = 0.35). Differences in feeding patterns were most evident around feed delivery times, with LOFE bulls displaying longer feeding durations and higher feed intake during the hours surrounding both morning and evening feed deliveries (P < 0.03). These findings demonstrate distinct behavioral differences between feed efficiency groups, particularly around feeding times. Bulls with higher feed efficiency exhibited more restrained feeding behavior, characterized by fewer visits and reduced feed intake. This suggests that behavioral patterns at the feed bunk could serve as an important criterion in bull selection for feed efficiency improvement.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year.
Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.