Chandler Kyle, Diva N Rigney, Duncan McSorley, Mason B Henson, Paul W Dyce, Kimberly Mullenix, Leanne Dillard, Brandon B Smith
{"title":"176 Performance, digestion, and passage of whole cottonseed offered either as libitum or under restriction to beef cows nursing calves","authors":"Chandler Kyle, Diva N Rigney, Duncan McSorley, Mason B Henson, Paul W Dyce, Kimberly Mullenix, Leanne Dillard, Brandon B Smith","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf170.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the southeastern U.S., whole cottonseed (WCS) is a readily available, nutritious, and cost-effective feedstuff for beef cattle. The NCR (2016) estimates that whole cottonseed contains approximately 52% neutral detergent fiber (NDF), 24% crude protein (CP), and 18% crude fat. Feeding recommendations on feeding WCS in beef cattle systems were developed in the 1980’s based on the whole cottonseed quality of that time. Based on recent studies, we have demonstrated changes in seed quality in the Southeast due to the development of new varieties. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine WCS supplementation rates in beef cow diets based on industry changes in cottonseed quality, especially in the Southeast. The experiment was conducted as a generalized complete block design with two feeding pens (blocks) of eight cow-calf pairs each. Cow-calf pairs were then randomly allocated into four treatments: a negative control receiving bermudagrass (BG) hay (CON), BG plus supplemental WCS at 15% targeted dry matter intake (DMI), BG plus WCS to achieve a crude fat allowance of 4% dry matter intake (FAT), and BG plus ad libitum supplemental WCS (LIB). Cows offered LIB consumed the most WCS (P < 0.01; 7.9 kg/d), followed by FAT (3.3 kg/d), then DMI (1.8 kg/d). However, total daily intake was greatest (P = 0.03) from CON (14.9 kg/d) and LIB (13.7 kg/d) and least from DMI (10.3 kg/d), with FAT intermediate (12.4 kg/d). There was no effect of treatment on dam milk production (P = 0.60) nor calf ADG (P = 0.47). Results are interpreted to mean that WCS may be offered beef cows nursing calves at levels approaching ad libitum consumption without adverse responses, though this may not achieve economic production goals.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf170.029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the southeastern U.S., whole cottonseed (WCS) is a readily available, nutritious, and cost-effective feedstuff for beef cattle. The NCR (2016) estimates that whole cottonseed contains approximately 52% neutral detergent fiber (NDF), 24% crude protein (CP), and 18% crude fat. Feeding recommendations on feeding WCS in beef cattle systems were developed in the 1980’s based on the whole cottonseed quality of that time. Based on recent studies, we have demonstrated changes in seed quality in the Southeast due to the development of new varieties. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine WCS supplementation rates in beef cow diets based on industry changes in cottonseed quality, especially in the Southeast. The experiment was conducted as a generalized complete block design with two feeding pens (blocks) of eight cow-calf pairs each. Cow-calf pairs were then randomly allocated into four treatments: a negative control receiving bermudagrass (BG) hay (CON), BG plus supplemental WCS at 15% targeted dry matter intake (DMI), BG plus WCS to achieve a crude fat allowance of 4% dry matter intake (FAT), and BG plus ad libitum supplemental WCS (LIB). Cows offered LIB consumed the most WCS (P < 0.01; 7.9 kg/d), followed by FAT (3.3 kg/d), then DMI (1.8 kg/d). However, total daily intake was greatest (P = 0.03) from CON (14.9 kg/d) and LIB (13.7 kg/d) and least from DMI (10.3 kg/d), with FAT intermediate (12.4 kg/d). There was no effect of treatment on dam milk production (P = 0.60) nor calf ADG (P = 0.47). Results are interpreted to mean that WCS may be offered beef cows nursing calves at levels approaching ad libitum consumption without adverse responses, though this may not achieve economic production goals.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year.
Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.