Introducing the Reflection Index: A Novel Radiographic Assessment of Cam Morphology in Femoroacetabular Impingement and Predictor of Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Andrew S. Paliobeis, John T. Strony, Jason G. Ina, Mingda Chen, Sunita Mengers, Molly Piper, James E. Voos, Michael J. Salata
{"title":"Introducing the Reflection Index: A Novel Radiographic Assessment of Cam Morphology in Femoroacetabular Impingement and Predictor of Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up","authors":"Andrew S. Paliobeis, John T. Strony, Jason G. Ina, Mingda Chen, Sunita Mengers, Molly Piper, James E. Voos, Michael J. Salata","doi":"10.1177/03635465251346954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is commonly treated with hip arthroscopy, and cam underresection is a common reason for failure. Cam resection is assessed intraoperatively using radiographic parameters. However, currently used parameters have had equivocal results predicting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after hip arthroscopy for FAI. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to define a novel radiographic parameter, termed the “reflection index,” which can be used to assess cam resection. The authors hypothesized that the postoperative reflection index would correlate with outcomes after hip arthroscopy. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients with symptomatic FAI undergoing primary hip arthroscopy between 2019 and 2021 were identified. Pre- and postoperative alpha angle, head-neck offset ratio (HNOR), and reflection index were measured. Reflection index was defined as a curvilinear area superior to the femoral neck divided by a curvilinear area inferior to the femoral neck on 45° Dunn lateral radiograph. A reflection index of 1 was defined as a perfect cam resection. PROs were obtained preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively, including modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), PROMIS Global Physical Health, PROMIS Global Mental Health, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Multivariate and logistic regression models were utilized to evaluate the predictive value of each radiographic measure on outcomes. Results: Sixty-three hips met eligibility criteria; the mean age was 29.13 years and 44 (69.84%) patients were female. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that a reflection index that deviated further from 1 was an independent predictor of lower postoperative mHHS and Global Physical Health and higher VAS, with regression coefficients of −137.099 ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; .001), –49.747 ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .004), and 9.548 ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .038), respectively, for the transformed variable abs(log(reflection index)). A reflection index closer to 1 was an independent predictor of achieving the Patient Acceptable Symptom State and substantial clinical benefit for mHHS at 2 years. Alpha angle and HNOR had no association with postoperative mHHS, Global Physical Health, Global Mental Health, or VAS scores. Conclusion: The reflection index can be used to assess cam resection in hip arthroscopy. A postoperative reflection index closer to 1 was an independent predictor of significantly superior PROs at final follow-up. Alpha angle and HNOR failed to predict outcomes. Thus, the reflection index may be a useful radiographic assessment in hip arthroscopy to provide prognostic value postoperatively and potentially guide resection if future technology allows for intraoperative calculation.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251346954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is commonly treated with hip arthroscopy, and cam underresection is a common reason for failure. Cam resection is assessed intraoperatively using radiographic parameters. However, currently used parameters have had equivocal results predicting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after hip arthroscopy for FAI. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to define a novel radiographic parameter, termed the “reflection index,” which can be used to assess cam resection. The authors hypothesized that the postoperative reflection index would correlate with outcomes after hip arthroscopy. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients with symptomatic FAI undergoing primary hip arthroscopy between 2019 and 2021 were identified. Pre- and postoperative alpha angle, head-neck offset ratio (HNOR), and reflection index were measured. Reflection index was defined as a curvilinear area superior to the femoral neck divided by a curvilinear area inferior to the femoral neck on 45° Dunn lateral radiograph. A reflection index of 1 was defined as a perfect cam resection. PROs were obtained preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively, including modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), PROMIS Global Physical Health, PROMIS Global Mental Health, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Multivariate and logistic regression models were utilized to evaluate the predictive value of each radiographic measure on outcomes. Results: Sixty-three hips met eligibility criteria; the mean age was 29.13 years and 44 (69.84%) patients were female. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that a reflection index that deviated further from 1 was an independent predictor of lower postoperative mHHS and Global Physical Health and higher VAS, with regression coefficients of −137.099 ( P < .001), –49.747 ( P = .004), and 9.548 ( P = .038), respectively, for the transformed variable abs(log(reflection index)). A reflection index closer to 1 was an independent predictor of achieving the Patient Acceptable Symptom State and substantial clinical benefit for mHHS at 2 years. Alpha angle and HNOR had no association with postoperative mHHS, Global Physical Health, Global Mental Health, or VAS scores. Conclusion: The reflection index can be used to assess cam resection in hip arthroscopy. A postoperative reflection index closer to 1 was an independent predictor of significantly superior PROs at final follow-up. Alpha angle and HNOR failed to predict outcomes. Thus, the reflection index may be a useful radiographic assessment in hip arthroscopy to provide prognostic value postoperatively and potentially guide resection if future technology allows for intraoperative calculation.
引入反射指数:一种新的股骨髋臼撞击凸轮形态的影像学评估和髋关节镜术后至少2年随访结果的预测因子
背景:股髋臼撞击(FAI)通常通过髋关节镜治疗,而髋臼未切除是失败的常见原因。术中使用影像学参数评估凸轮切除。然而,目前使用的参数在预测FAI髋关节镜术后患者报告的预后(PROs)时结果模棱两可。目的/假设:本研究的目的是定义一种新的放射学参数,称为“反射指数”,可用于评估凸轮切除。作者假设术后反射指数与髋关节镜检查结果相关。研究设计:病例系列;证据等级,4级。方法:对2019年至2021年间接受初级髋关节镜检查的有症状的FAI患者进行鉴定。测量术前和术后α角、头颈偏移比(HNOR)和反射指数。反射指数定义为45°Dunn侧位片上股骨颈上方的曲线区域除以股骨颈下方的曲线区域。定义反射指数为1为凸轮完全切除。术前和术后2年分别获得PROs,包括改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)、PROMIS全球身体健康、PROMIS全球心理健康和疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)。采用多变量和逻辑回归模型评估各影像学指标对预后的预测价值。结果:63例髋关节符合入选标准;平均年龄29.13岁,女性44例(69.84%)。多因素回归分析显示,反映指数进一步偏离1是术后mHHS和整体身体健康较低和VAS较高的独立预测因子,回归系数为- 137.099 (P <;转换后的变量abs(log(反射指数))分别为-49.747 (P = 0.004)和9.548 (P = 0.038)。接近1的反映指数是实现患者可接受症状状态和mHHS 2年临床获益的独立预测因子。α角和HNOR与术后mHHS、整体生理健康、整体心理健康或VAS评分无关。结论:反射指数可用于评估髋关节镜下凸轮切除。术后反射指数接近1是最终随访时pro显著优于pro的独立预测因子。α角和HNOR不能预测结果。因此,如果未来的技术允许术中计算,反射指数可能是髋关节镜中一个有用的放射学评估,可以提供术后预后价值,并可能指导切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信