Vaccine hesitancy among primary care health workers in Campo Grande, after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Danilo Dos Santos Conrado, Simony Portela do Carmo Drumond, Ana Isabel do Nascimento, Maria Elizabeth Araújo Ajalla, Cláudia Du Bocage Santos-Pinto, Everton Falcão de Oliveira
{"title":"Vaccine hesitancy among primary care health workers in Campo Grande, after the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Danilo Dos Santos Conrado, Simony Portela do Carmo Drumond, Ana Isabel do Nascimento, Maria Elizabeth Araújo Ajalla, Cláudia Du Bocage Santos-Pinto, Everton Falcão de Oliveira","doi":"10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240481.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze vaccine hesitancy among primary care health workers, including the factors associated with it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional descriptive study carried out between November 2022 and August 2023 in the city of Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, through the application of a questionnaire on vaccine hesitancy proposed by the World Health Organization. The association of vaccine hesitancy with sociodemographic variables and workers' perceptions was verified by bivariate analysis and multiple variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy was observed in 32.7% of respondents, with a higher frequency after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic (64.9%). The coronavirus-19 vaccine had the highest frequency of hesitation (68.4%). Doctors and nurses were the least hesitant, while community workers were the most hesitant. Believing that there are reasons for people not to get vaccinated was associated with vaccine hesitancy (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.01; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.60; 5.71). On the other hand, receiving institutional guidance to get vaccinated (OR 0.30; 95%CI 0.11; 0.78) and believing that hesitation affects the population's vaccination coverage (OR 0.46; 95%CI 0.25; 0.83) were factors associated with low hesitation frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy was common among primary care professionals. The COVID-19 pandemic and the infodemic that followed it appear to have contributed to this scenery. The need for interventions aimed at these workers is highlighted, in order to impact vaccination coverage of the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":520611,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil","volume":"34 ","pages":"e20240481"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240481.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze vaccine hesitancy among primary care health workers, including the factors associated with it.

Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study carried out between November 2022 and August 2023 in the city of Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, through the application of a questionnaire on vaccine hesitancy proposed by the World Health Organization. The association of vaccine hesitancy with sociodemographic variables and workers' perceptions was verified by bivariate analysis and multiple variables.

Results: Vaccine hesitancy was observed in 32.7% of respondents, with a higher frequency after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic (64.9%). The coronavirus-19 vaccine had the highest frequency of hesitation (68.4%). Doctors and nurses were the least hesitant, while community workers were the most hesitant. Believing that there are reasons for people not to get vaccinated was associated with vaccine hesitancy (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.01; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.60; 5.71). On the other hand, receiving institutional guidance to get vaccinated (OR 0.30; 95%CI 0.11; 0.78) and believing that hesitation affects the population's vaccination coverage (OR 0.46; 95%CI 0.25; 0.83) were factors associated with low hesitation frequency.

Conclusion: Vaccine hesitancy was common among primary care professionals. The COVID-19 pandemic and the infodemic that followed it appear to have contributed to this scenery. The need for interventions aimed at these workers is highlighted, in order to impact vaccination coverage of the general population.

COVID-19大流行后坎波格兰德初级保健卫生工作者对疫苗的犹豫。
目的:分析初级保健卫生工作者的疫苗犹豫及其相关因素。方法:采用世界卫生组织提出的疫苗犹豫问卷,于2022年11月至2023年8月在南马托格罗索州坎波格兰德市进行横断面描述性研究。通过双变量分析和多变量验证了疫苗犹豫与社会人口学变量和工人观念的关联。结果:32.7%的应答者存在疫苗犹豫,在COVID-19大流行开始后出现的频率更高(64.9%)。冠状病毒-19疫苗的犹豫率最高(68.4%)。医生和护士最不犹豫,而社区工作者最犹豫。认为人们有理由不接种疫苗与疫苗犹豫相关(调整后优势比(OR) 3.01;95%置信区间(95% ci) 1.60;5.71)。另一方面,接受机构指导接种疫苗(OR 0.30;95%可信区间0.11;0.78),并认为犹豫会影响人口的疫苗接种覆盖率(OR 0.46;95%可信区间0.25;0.83)是低犹豫频率的相关因素。结论:初级保健专业人员普遍存在疫苗犹豫。COVID-19大流行和随之而来的信息大流行似乎促成了这一景象。强调需要针对这些工作人员采取干预措施,以影响一般人口的疫苗接种覆盖率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信