Novel approach for determining beam latency using the center of mass of the radiation field measured with a diode detector array.

Mathias Dierl, Ndimofor Chofor, Arnd Röser, Christoph Bert, Andreas A Schönfeld
{"title":"Novel approach for determining beam latency using the center of mass of the radiation field measured with a diode detector array.","authors":"Mathias Dierl, Ndimofor Chofor, Arnd Röser, Christoph Bert, Andreas A Schönfeld","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study presents a novel approach to measure beam-on/off latency of a surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system by employing a setup with a commercial diode detector array to simultaneously capture motion profiles and monitor real-time radiation delivery on a single timestamp, without the need to synchronize different measurements devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Beam-on/off latencies were assessed for an AlignRT SGRT system integrated with an Elekta Versa HD and a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator (linac). The SGRT system triggered the beam by tracking a commercial modular phantom setup comprising of an anthropomorphic head add-on surrogate and a centrally located diode detector array, with the setup mounted on a Dynamic Motion Platform (DMP). Leveraging the diode array's high sampling frequency of 50 ms, motion was simultaneously tracked by mapping the dose distribution's center of mass (CoM) to the radiation delivery timeline during the delivery of a 2×2 cm2 static field. The region of interest (ROI) for CoM calculation was confined to dose levels exceeding a 10% threshold. Latencies were evaluated for 6 MV flattened (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams at various dose rates (DR) using three DMP motion patterns (sinusoidal, sharkfin, and sawtooth). Amplitude-based gating was implemented at the SGRT system with a 5 mm position tolerance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the Versa HD, beam-on latency averaged 1650 ± 110 ms, remaining stable for DRs of 400-1200 MU/min for the 6 MV FFF beam. For the 6 MV FF beam, latency increased exponentially to approximately 2000 ms when the DR dropped from 200 to 50 MU/min. Beam-off latency averaged 230 ± 90 ms and was independent of DR for both 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams. For the TrueBeam linac, beam-on latency averaged 280 ± 90 ms, showing no DR dependence in either beam configuration, while beam-off latency averaged 360 ± 90 ms, slightly shorter for 6 MV FFF compared to 6 MV FF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CoM method has been effectively implemented to quantify beam-on/off latencies by integrating SGRT-based motion tracking with real-time radiation dose measurements from a diode detector array, all synchronized to a single timestamp. The results revealed latency variations across different linac vendors and underscored the influence of dose rate and beam energy. With this approach, beam-on/off latencies can be efficiently assessed, providing crucial guidance for defining target volume margins, enhancing both precision and safety in high-dose stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).</p>","PeriodicalId":101315,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.06.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study presents a novel approach to measure beam-on/off latency of a surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system by employing a setup with a commercial diode detector array to simultaneously capture motion profiles and monitor real-time radiation delivery on a single timestamp, without the need to synchronize different measurements devices.

Methods: Beam-on/off latencies were assessed for an AlignRT SGRT system integrated with an Elekta Versa HD and a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator (linac). The SGRT system triggered the beam by tracking a commercial modular phantom setup comprising of an anthropomorphic head add-on surrogate and a centrally located diode detector array, with the setup mounted on a Dynamic Motion Platform (DMP). Leveraging the diode array's high sampling frequency of 50 ms, motion was simultaneously tracked by mapping the dose distribution's center of mass (CoM) to the radiation delivery timeline during the delivery of a 2×2 cm2 static field. The region of interest (ROI) for CoM calculation was confined to dose levels exceeding a 10% threshold. Latencies were evaluated for 6 MV flattened (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams at various dose rates (DR) using three DMP motion patterns (sinusoidal, sharkfin, and sawtooth). Amplitude-based gating was implemented at the SGRT system with a 5 mm position tolerance.

Results: For the Versa HD, beam-on latency averaged 1650 ± 110 ms, remaining stable for DRs of 400-1200 MU/min for the 6 MV FFF beam. For the 6 MV FF beam, latency increased exponentially to approximately 2000 ms when the DR dropped from 200 to 50 MU/min. Beam-off latency averaged 230 ± 90 ms and was independent of DR for both 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams. For the TrueBeam linac, beam-on latency averaged 280 ± 90 ms, showing no DR dependence in either beam configuration, while beam-off latency averaged 360 ± 90 ms, slightly shorter for 6 MV FFF compared to 6 MV FF.

Conclusions: The CoM method has been effectively implemented to quantify beam-on/off latencies by integrating SGRT-based motion tracking with real-time radiation dose measurements from a diode detector array, all synchronized to a single timestamp. The results revealed latency variations across different linac vendors and underscored the influence of dose rate and beam energy. With this approach, beam-on/off latencies can be efficiently assessed, providing crucial guidance for defining target volume margins, enhancing both precision and safety in high-dose stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

利用二极管探测器阵列测量的辐射场质心来确定光束延迟的新方法。
目的:本研究提出了一种测量表面引导放射治疗(SGRT)系统的光束开启/关闭延迟的新方法,该方法采用商用二极管探测器阵列设置,同时捕获运动轮廓并监测单个时间戳上的实时辐射传递,而无需同步不同的测量设备。方法:评估与Elekta Versa HD和Varian TrueBeam直线加速器(直线加速器)集成的AlignRT SGRT系统的光束开启/关闭延迟。SGRT系统通过跟踪商业模块化幻影装置来触发光束,该装置由拟人化头部附加代理和位于中心的二极管探测器阵列组成,该装置安装在动态运动平台(DMP)上。利用二极管阵列50毫秒的高采样频率,通过将剂量分布的质心(CoM)映射到传递2×2 cm2静态场期间的辐射传递时间线,同时跟踪运动。CoM计算的兴趣区域(ROI)仅限于超过10%阈值的剂量水平。使用三种DMP运动模式(正弦、鲨鱼鳍和锯齿),在不同剂量率(DR)下评估6 MV平坦(FF)和平坦无滤波器(FFF)光束的潜伏期。基于振幅的门控在SGRT系统中实现,位置公差为5mm。结果:对于Versa HD,波束上延迟平均为1650±110 ms,在6 MV FFF波束的dr为400-1200 MU/min时保持稳定。对于6 MV FF波束,当DR从200 MU/min下降到50 MU/min时,延迟指数增加到约2000 ms。6 MV和6 MV FFF波束的离束延迟平均为230±90 ms,与DR无关。对于TrueBeam直线加速器,波束开启延迟平均为280±90 ms,在两种波束配置中都没有DR依赖,而波束关闭延迟平均为360±90 ms, 6 MV FFF比6 MV FF略短。结论:CoM方法通过将基于sgrt的运动跟踪与二极管探测器阵列的实时辐射剂量测量相结合,有效地实现了对光束开/关延迟的量化,所有这些都同步到单个时间戳。结果揭示了不同直线加速器供应商的潜伏期差异,并强调了剂量率和束流能量的影响。通过这种方法,可以有效地评估光束开启/关闭延迟,为确定靶体积边界提供重要指导,提高高剂量立体定向放射外科手术(SRS)的精度和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信