Investigating the link between COVID-19 misinformation exposure and vaccine hesitancy through perceptions of efficacy and unsafety.

IF 3.1
Nan Yu, Jinxu Li, Weirui Wang, Ann Neville Miller
{"title":"Investigating the link between COVID-19 misinformation exposure and vaccine hesitancy through perceptions of efficacy and unsafety.","authors":"Nan Yu, Jinxu Li, Weirui Wang, Ann Neville Miller","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Misinformation has played a significant role in shaping public attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines, contributing to vaccine hesitancy. This study examines the relationship between misinformation exposure and vaccine hesitancy, focusing on the mediating roles of perceived vaccine safety and efficacy. Additionally, it explores how trust in misinformation influences these relationships.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted between March and May 2021 across four university campuses in the southeastern United States (N = 819). Participants (Mean age = 20.55, SD = 2.85) were predominantly female (N = 525, 64.1%). Mediation and moderated mediation analyses were performed using Hayes' PROCESS Model 4 and Model 8.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed that greater exposure to vaccine misinformation was associated with higher vaccine hesitancy. This relationship was mediated by increased perceptions of vaccine unsafety and reduced beliefs in vaccine efficacy. Additionally, trust in misinformation strengthened the indirect effect through perceived vaccine unsafety, reinforcing hesitancy among individuals who found misinformation more credible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the critical role of misinformation in shaping vaccine hesitancy. By identifying the psychological mechanisms underlying this relationship, these insights can inform strategies to counter misinformation, improve public trust in vaccines, and enhance health communication in future public health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaf069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Misinformation has played a significant role in shaping public attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines, contributing to vaccine hesitancy. This study examines the relationship between misinformation exposure and vaccine hesitancy, focusing on the mediating roles of perceived vaccine safety and efficacy. Additionally, it explores how trust in misinformation influences these relationships.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between March and May 2021 across four university campuses in the southeastern United States (N = 819). Participants (Mean age = 20.55, SD = 2.85) were predominantly female (N = 525, 64.1%). Mediation and moderated mediation analyses were performed using Hayes' PROCESS Model 4 and Model 8.

Results: Findings revealed that greater exposure to vaccine misinformation was associated with higher vaccine hesitancy. This relationship was mediated by increased perceptions of vaccine unsafety and reduced beliefs in vaccine efficacy. Additionally, trust in misinformation strengthened the indirect effect through perceived vaccine unsafety, reinforcing hesitancy among individuals who found misinformation more credible.

Conclusion: This study highlights the critical role of misinformation in shaping vaccine hesitancy. By identifying the psychological mechanisms underlying this relationship, these insights can inform strategies to counter misinformation, improve public trust in vaccines, and enhance health communication in future public health crises.

通过对有效性和不安全性的认知,调查COVID-19错误信息暴露与疫苗犹豫之间的联系。
背景:错误信息在塑造公众对COVID-19疫苗的态度方面发挥了重要作用,导致疫苗犹豫。本研究探讨了错误信息暴露与疫苗犹豫之间的关系,重点研究了感知疫苗安全性和有效性的中介作用。此外,它还探讨了对错误信息的信任如何影响这些关系。方法:在2021年3月至5月期间,在美国东南部的四所大学校园进行了横断面调查(N = 819)。参与者(平均年龄= 20.55,SD = 2.85)以女性为主(N = 525, 64.1%)。采用Hayes’PROCESS模型4和模型8进行中介分析和有调节中介分析。结果:研究结果显示,更多地接触疫苗错误信息与更高的疫苗犹豫有关。这种关系是由对疫苗不安全性的认识增加和对疫苗有效性的信念降低介导的。此外,对错误信息的信任通过感知疫苗不安全加强了间接影响,加强了认为错误信息更可信的个人的犹豫。结论:本研究强调了错误信息在形成疫苗犹豫中的关键作用。通过确定这种关系背后的心理机制,这些见解可以为反击错误信息的战略提供信息,提高公众对疫苗的信任,并在未来的公共卫生危机中加强卫生沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信