Workplace Culture of Health, Remote Work, and Employee Wellbeing: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 1.4
Michele W Marenus, Mary Marzec, Amy Kilbourne, Natalie Colabianchi, Weiyun Chen
{"title":"Workplace Culture of Health, Remote Work, and Employee Wellbeing: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Michele W Marenus, Mary Marzec, Amy Kilbourne, Natalie Colabianchi, Weiyun Chen","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the differences in perceptions of workplace culture of health, physical activity (PA), psychological wellbeing, and work productivity among three workforce settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods study design was utilized, including data from a questionnaire (n = 520) and from interviews (n = 20). Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, and multivariate analysis of variance, while qualitative data was analyzed using thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Onsite employees had higher levels of total PA than both hybrid and remote employees (p < 0.05). Additionally, hybrid employees reported higher levels of self-acceptance than both onsite and remote employees (p < 0.05). Qualitative findings highlighted remote work's autonomy and flexibility, leadership's role, and work-from-home challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remote and hybrid work is associated with both positive and negative wellbeing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study explored the differences in perceptions of workplace culture of health, physical activity (PA), psychological wellbeing, and work productivity among three workforce settings.

Methods: A mixed methods study design was utilized, including data from a questionnaire (n = 520) and from interviews (n = 20). Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, and multivariate analysis of variance, while qualitative data was analyzed using thematic content analysis.

Results: Onsite employees had higher levels of total PA than both hybrid and remote employees (p < 0.05). Additionally, hybrid employees reported higher levels of self-acceptance than both onsite and remote employees (p < 0.05). Qualitative findings highlighted remote work's autonomy and flexibility, leadership's role, and work-from-home challenges.

Conclusion: Remote and hybrid work is associated with both positive and negative wellbeing outcomes.

职场健康文化、远程工作和员工幸福感:一项混合方法研究。
目的:本研究探讨了三种工作环境下工作场所文化对健康、身体活动、心理健康和工作效率的认知差异。方法:采用混合方法研究设计,包括问卷调查(n = 520)和访谈(n = 20)的数据。定量数据采用描述性统计和多变量方差分析,定性数据采用主题内容分析。结果:现场员工总PA水平高于混合型员工和远程员工(p < 0.05)。此外,混合型员工的自我接纳水平高于现场员工和远程员工(p < 0.05)。定性研究结果强调了远程工作的自主性和灵活性、领导角色以及在家工作的挑战。结论:远程和混合工作与积极和消极的幸福感结果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信