Maryline Krummenacher, Mika Tarvainen, Estelle Montet, Michelle C Turner, Irina Guseva Canu
{"title":"Which Device Is Most Suitable for Measuring Heart Rate Variability in the Field? A Comparative Evaluation of Two Leading Options.","authors":"Maryline Krummenacher, Mika Tarvainen, Estelle Montet, Michelle C Turner, Irina Guseva Canu","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare the Polar H10 and Bittium Faros™ heart rate variability monitors for use in occupational and environmental health research, considering data collection, storage, transfer, resource needs, and limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review, device testing, and expert interviews were conducted to assess device performance and usability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Polar H10 is affordable, records RR intervals for up to 20 hours offline, and requires a smartwatch and app for extended storage. Bittium Faros™ is a certified electrocardiogram monitor that records full waveforms, supports long measurements, and enables automatic data transfer. Both devices can be worn with a chest strap, but placement issues may affect data quality. Patch electrodes improve stability but may cause skin irritation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This assessment highlights key device differences to guide HRV monitor selection for occupational and environmental epidemiological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":"717-722"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the Polar H10 and Bittium Faros™ heart rate variability monitors for use in occupational and environmental health research, considering data collection, storage, transfer, resource needs, and limitations.
Methods: A literature review, device testing, and expert interviews were conducted to assess device performance and usability.
Results: Polar H10 is affordable, records RR intervals for up to 20 hours offline, and requires a smartwatch and app for extended storage. Bittium Faros™ is a certified electrocardiogram monitor that records full waveforms, supports long measurements, and enables automatic data transfer. Both devices can be worn with a chest strap, but placement issues may affect data quality. Patch electrodes improve stability but may cause skin irritation.
Conclusions: This assessment highlights key device differences to guide HRV monitor selection for occupational and environmental epidemiological studies.