Focusing on Close Relationships Associated with Improved Outcomes in a Workplace Gratitude Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.4
Katherine J Gold, Margaret L Dobson, Ananda Sen
{"title":"Focusing on Close Relationships Associated with Improved Outcomes in a Workplace Gratitude Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Katherine J Gold, Margaret L Dobson, Ananda Sen","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gratitude programs may improve well-being among healthcare workers, but it is unknown whether the content of practices matters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a text-based randomized controlled trial of \"Three Good Things\" (3GT) in a large academic primary care department. Participants responded to texts thrice weekly for three weeks and listed good things that happened that day. We measured depression, positive affect, gratitude, and life satisfaction for \"immediate intervention\" and \"delayed\" intervention groups. We coded >4600 entries and used multivariable regression to control for department age, role, and gender to see if content affected well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>223 of 468 individuals (48%) enrolled. Close relationships and identifying valuable people in one's life were associated with the strongest benefits, but not all \"good things\" improved outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Focusing gratitude on relationships may be most impactful.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Gratitude programs may improve well-being among healthcare workers, but it is unknown whether the content of practices matters.

Methods: We conducted a text-based randomized controlled trial of "Three Good Things" (3GT) in a large academic primary care department. Participants responded to texts thrice weekly for three weeks and listed good things that happened that day. We measured depression, positive affect, gratitude, and life satisfaction for "immediate intervention" and "delayed" intervention groups. We coded >4600 entries and used multivariable regression to control for department age, role, and gender to see if content affected well-being.

Results: 223 of 468 individuals (48%) enrolled. Close relationships and identifying valuable people in one's life were associated with the strongest benefits, but not all "good things" improved outcomes.

Conclusions: Focusing gratitude on relationships may be most impactful.

在一项职场感恩随机对照试验中,关注与改善结果相关的亲密关系。
目的:感恩计划可能会提高医疗工作者的幸福感,但实践的内容是否重要尚不清楚。方法:我们在一家大型学术初级保健部门进行了一项基于文本的“三好事”(3GT)随机对照试验。参与者每周回复三次短信,持续三周,并列出当天发生的好事。我们测量了“即时干预”组和“延迟干预”组的抑郁、积极影响、感恩和生活满意度。我们编码了bb104600个条目,并使用多变量回归来控制部门年龄、角色和性别,以查看内容是否影响幸福感。结果:468人中有223人(48%)入选。亲密的关系和确定生活中有价值的人与最强的好处相关,但并不是所有的“好事情”都能改善结果。结论:将感恩集中在人际关系上可能是最有影响力的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信