Does Medical Directions Make any Differences in Workers' Compensation System? Analysis of Employee and Employer Directed Medical Care in Relation to Prolonged Physical Therapy and Attorney Involvement among Rotator Cuff Tear Claims.

Xuguang Grant Tao, Paul Kauffman, Nimisha Kalia, Nina Leung, Nicholas F Tsourmas, Larry Yuspeh, Edward J Bernacki
{"title":"Does Medical Directions Make any Differences in Workers' Compensation System? Analysis of Employee and Employer Directed Medical Care in Relation to Prolonged Physical Therapy and Attorney Involvement among Rotator Cuff Tear Claims.","authors":"Xuguang Grant Tao, Paul Kauffman, Nimisha Kalia, Nina Leung, Nicholas F Tsourmas, Larry Yuspeh, Edward J Bernacki","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to explore differences in employee or employer directed medical care for workplace injuries, related to the prolonged physical therapy (PT) and attorney involvement in the workers' compensation claim process.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>8,814 rotator cuff tear claims filed to a nationwide insurance carrier from 2007 to 2022 were analyzed for difference in prolonged PT (≥360 days) and attorney involvement by medical direction groups.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Employee directed and shared employee and employer directed medical care had odds ratios of 1.41 and 1.58 for prolonged PT compared to employer direction, respectively. Employer directed and shared employee and employer medical direction had odds ratios of 2.33 and 1.62 for attorney involvement compared to employee direction, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Employee directed medical care is associated with more physical therapy and employer involved direction is associated with more attorney involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to explore differences in employee or employer directed medical care for workplace injuries, related to the prolonged physical therapy (PT) and attorney involvement in the workers' compensation claim process.

Method: 8,814 rotator cuff tear claims filed to a nationwide insurance carrier from 2007 to 2022 were analyzed for difference in prolonged PT (≥360 days) and attorney involvement by medical direction groups.

Result: Employee directed and shared employee and employer directed medical care had odds ratios of 1.41 and 1.58 for prolonged PT compared to employer direction, respectively. Employer directed and shared employee and employer medical direction had odds ratios of 2.33 and 1.62 for attorney involvement compared to employee direction, respectively.

Conclusion: Employee directed medical care is associated with more physical therapy and employer involved direction is associated with more attorney involvement.

医疗指示对工伤赔偿制度有影响吗?肩袖撕裂索赔中与长期物理治疗和律师介入相关的雇员和雇主指导医疗护理分析。
目的:探讨与长期物理治疗(PT)和律师参与工伤索赔过程有关的雇员或雇主指导的工伤医疗保健的差异。方法:分析2007年至2022年向全国保险公司提交的8,814份肩袖撕裂索赔,分析医疗指导组延长PT(≥360天)和律师参与的差异。结果:与雇主指导相比,员工指导和共享员工和雇主指导的医疗服务延长PT的优势比分别为1.41和1.58。与雇员指导相比,雇主指导和分享雇员和雇主医疗指导的律师参与的优势比分别为2.33和1.62。结论:员工主导的医疗护理与更多的物理治疗相关,雇主参与的指导与更多的律师参与相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信