{"title":"Evaluation of coronary heights after Bio-Bentall using Piehler technique.","authors":"Kimihiro Kobayashi, Yoshinori Kuroda, Masahiro Mizumoto, Jun Hayashi, Shuto Hirooka, Kentaro Akabane, Tomonori Ochiai, Tetsuro Uchida","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivaf150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The valve-in-valve procedure is an alternative to the redo surgery for structural valve deterioration following the Bio-Bentall. However, the risk of coronary obstruction and the feasibility of this approach remain unclear. Using computed tomography, we compared the aortic root geometry of 14 consecutive patients (13 true aortic aneurysms) with Bio-Bentall between April 2011 and April 2024 preoperatively and postoperatively. The Piehler technique was used in all coronary artery reconstructions. During the follow-up period, no reconstructive coronary events or valve-related reoperations were observed. The coronary height was 17.7 ± 5.6 mm preoperatively versus 18.8 ± 4.4 mm postoperatively for the left coronary artery (P = 0.49) and 15.4 ± 9.6 mm preoperatively versus 22.6 ± 7.4 mm postoperatively for the right coronary artery (P < 0.01). No patients at risk of coronary obstruction associated with valve-in-valve were identified. One case of severe aortic graft kinking due to excessive graft length, which could contraindicate the valve-in-valve procedure, was observed. Our findings suggested that the Piehler technique may facilitate future valve-in-valve implantation after Bio-Bentall because it allows for a higher-positioned orifice of the reconstructive coronary artery.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The valve-in-valve procedure is an alternative to the redo surgery for structural valve deterioration following the Bio-Bentall. However, the risk of coronary obstruction and the feasibility of this approach remain unclear. Using computed tomography, we compared the aortic root geometry of 14 consecutive patients (13 true aortic aneurysms) with Bio-Bentall between April 2011 and April 2024 preoperatively and postoperatively. The Piehler technique was used in all coronary artery reconstructions. During the follow-up period, no reconstructive coronary events or valve-related reoperations were observed. The coronary height was 17.7 ± 5.6 mm preoperatively versus 18.8 ± 4.4 mm postoperatively for the left coronary artery (P = 0.49) and 15.4 ± 9.6 mm preoperatively versus 22.6 ± 7.4 mm postoperatively for the right coronary artery (P < 0.01). No patients at risk of coronary obstruction associated with valve-in-valve were identified. One case of severe aortic graft kinking due to excessive graft length, which could contraindicate the valve-in-valve procedure, was observed. Our findings suggested that the Piehler technique may facilitate future valve-in-valve implantation after Bio-Bentall because it allows for a higher-positioned orifice of the reconstructive coronary artery.
对于Bio-Bentall术后结构性瓣膜恶化的患者,瓣中瓣手术是一种可替代的重做手术。然而,冠状动脉阻塞的风险和这种方法的可行性尚不清楚。通过计算机断层扫描,我们比较了2011年4月至2024年4月期间连续14例患者(13例真主动脉瘤)术前和术后Bio-Bentall的主动脉根部几何形状。所有冠状动脉重建均采用Piehler技术。在随访期间,没有观察到冠状动脉重建事件或瓣膜相关的再手术。左冠状动脉冠状动脉高度术前17.7±5.6 mm vs术后18.8±4.4 mm (p = 0.49);右冠状动脉冠状动脉高度术前15.4±9.6 mm vs术后22.6±7.4 mm (p = 0.49)