Toward a Disability Affirming Model of Medicine in the United States and Beyond.

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
David A O'Connell, Bridget Cichon, Nathaniel Kern, Matthew Purinton, Meg Traci, Mary Stephens
{"title":"Toward a Disability Affirming Model of Medicine in the United States and Beyond.","authors":"David A O'Connell, Bridget Cichon, Nathaniel Kern, Matthew Purinton, Meg Traci, Mary Stephens","doi":"10.1080/10401334.2025.2521004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite increased attention and advocacy around disability in academia, both health professions trainees and Disabled people seeking healthcare in the US continue to report shortcomings in the providers' preparedness to care effectively for Disabled patients. Some of these shortcomings have historical roots in flawed theories of disability and ableism, but even with advancements in Disability Studies and the adoption of the biopsychosocial model of disability, trainees continue to receive insufficient exposure to disability theory and Disabled people. When graduates become independent providers and clinical directors, their educational shortcomings persist, and Disabled patients pay the price in the form of universally worse healthcare outcomes. We focus this article on the need for improved training; in part, we offer a student response to the health equity policy recommendation from the National Council on Disability to require \"…comprehensive disability clinical-care curricula in all US medical, nursing and other healthcare professional schools,\" a platform also reflected in the American Medical Association's Organizational Strategic Plan to Advance Health Equity. A group of medical students and educators at a large health institution in Philadelphia, PA, formed a working group inspired by an institutional review process around disability in their medical curriculum. Alongside a Disabled advocate and licensed clinical social worker (LCSW) in the same community, students imagined steps they would take to pursue a Disability Affirming Model of Medicine. We begin this article by reflecting on the progress made in academic and clinical medicine on the national level and at our institution, examining persistent failures in disability curricula in undergraduate medical education and discussing elements of wisdom gleaned from allied fields like social work. Our LCSW coauthor reflects on his experiences as a Disabled provider and as an educator within a medical field that remains largely inaccessible. Student coauthors consider their meaningful experiences with disability in educational and personal spheres, focusing on how learning from Disabled people like their coauthor has shaped their approach to disability in healthcare. Reflecting on these lessons and drawing on wisdom from their experience with curricular reform around Disability Studies, students conclude with recommendations for pedagogical redesign to facilitate comfort and proficiency in trainees' delivery of care to Disabled patients. We hope to galvanize efforts toward building a Disability Affirming Model of Medicine by calling upon peer advocates at every level of medical education, at home in the US and internationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":51183,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2025.2521004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite increased attention and advocacy around disability in academia, both health professions trainees and Disabled people seeking healthcare in the US continue to report shortcomings in the providers' preparedness to care effectively for Disabled patients. Some of these shortcomings have historical roots in flawed theories of disability and ableism, but even with advancements in Disability Studies and the adoption of the biopsychosocial model of disability, trainees continue to receive insufficient exposure to disability theory and Disabled people. When graduates become independent providers and clinical directors, their educational shortcomings persist, and Disabled patients pay the price in the form of universally worse healthcare outcomes. We focus this article on the need for improved training; in part, we offer a student response to the health equity policy recommendation from the National Council on Disability to require "…comprehensive disability clinical-care curricula in all US medical, nursing and other healthcare professional schools," a platform also reflected in the American Medical Association's Organizational Strategic Plan to Advance Health Equity. A group of medical students and educators at a large health institution in Philadelphia, PA, formed a working group inspired by an institutional review process around disability in their medical curriculum. Alongside a Disabled advocate and licensed clinical social worker (LCSW) in the same community, students imagined steps they would take to pursue a Disability Affirming Model of Medicine. We begin this article by reflecting on the progress made in academic and clinical medicine on the national level and at our institution, examining persistent failures in disability curricula in undergraduate medical education and discussing elements of wisdom gleaned from allied fields like social work. Our LCSW coauthor reflects on his experiences as a Disabled provider and as an educator within a medical field that remains largely inaccessible. Student coauthors consider their meaningful experiences with disability in educational and personal spheres, focusing on how learning from Disabled people like their coauthor has shaped their approach to disability in healthcare. Reflecting on these lessons and drawing on wisdom from their experience with curricular reform around Disability Studies, students conclude with recommendations for pedagogical redesign to facilitate comfort and proficiency in trainees' delivery of care to Disabled patients. We hope to galvanize efforts toward building a Disability Affirming Model of Medicine by calling upon peer advocates at every level of medical education, at home in the US and internationally.

迈向美国及其他国家的残疾医学确认模式。
尽管学术界对残疾的关注和倡导越来越多,但在美国,卫生专业受训人员和寻求医疗保健的残疾人都继续报告说,提供者在有效照顾残疾患者方面的准备不足。其中一些缺陷的历史根源在于有缺陷的残疾和残疾歧视理论,但即使残疾研究取得了进步,采用了残疾的生物心理社会模型,学员对残疾理论和残疾人的接触仍然不足。当毕业生成为独立提供者和临床主任时,他们的教育缺陷仍然存在,残疾患者以普遍较差的医疗结果的形式付出代价。本文将重点讨论改进培训的必要性;在某种程度上,我们为学生提供了对国家残疾委员会健康公平政策建议的回应,该建议要求“……在所有美国医学、护理和其他医疗专业学校开设全面的残疾临床护理课程”,这一平台也反映在美国医学协会推进健康公平的组织战略计划中。宾夕法尼亚州费城一家大型医疗机构的一群医学生和教育工作者,受其医学课程中残疾问题的机构审查过程的启发,组成了一个工作组。在同一个社区,学生们与残疾人倡导者和有执照的临床社会工作者(LCSW)一起想象他们将采取的步骤,以追求残疾医学的肯定模式。本文的开头,我们反思了国家层面和我们机构在学术和临床医学方面取得的进展,检查了本科医学教育中残疾课程的持续失败,并讨论了从社会工作等相关领域收集到的智慧元素。我们的LCSW合著者反映了他作为残疾人提供者和医疗领域的教育者的经历,这在很大程度上仍然是不可接近的。学生合著者考虑了他们在教育和个人领域与残疾的有意义的经历,重点是如何从像他们的合著者一样的残疾人那里学习,塑造了他们在医疗保健方面的残疾方法。学生们反思了这些教训,并从残疾研究课程改革的经验中汲取智慧,最后提出了重新设计教学方法的建议,以促进学员对残疾患者的舒适和熟练的护理。我们希望通过在美国国内和国际医学教育的各个层面呼吁同行倡导者,为建立残疾确认医学模式做出努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Teaching and Learning in Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Medicine ( TLM) is an international, forum for scholarship on teaching and learning in the health professions. Its international scope reflects the common challenge faced by all medical educators: fostering the development of capable, well-rounded, and continuous learners prepared to practice in a complex, high-stakes, and ever-changing clinical environment. TLM''s contributors and readership comprise behavioral scientists and health care practitioners, signaling the value of integrating diverse perspectives into a comprehensive understanding of learning and performance. The journal seeks to provide the theoretical foundations and practical analysis needed for effective educational decision making in such areas as admissions, instructional design and delivery, performance assessment, remediation, technology-assisted instruction, diversity management, and faculty development, among others. TLM''s scope includes all levels of medical education, from premedical to postgraduate and continuing medical education, with articles published in the following categories:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信