Anna Tostrup Kristensen, Noora Helene Thune, Amer Sehic, Tor Paaske Utheim, Hugo Lewi Hammer, Qalbi Khan
{"title":"Knowledge Retention in Tooth Morphology Among Dental Hygienists.","authors":"Anna Tostrup Kristensen, Noora Helene Thune, Amer Sehic, Tor Paaske Utheim, Hugo Lewi Hammer, Qalbi Khan","doi":"10.1111/eje.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dental hygienists play an essential role in promoting oral health and preventing oral diseases. A strong foundation in tooth morphology is critical for effective dental hygiene practise. This study aims to evaluate and compare tooth morphology knowledge among undergraduate dental hygiene students and practising dental hygienists.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A Tooth Identification Examination was conducted with 54 first-year dental hygiene students (Control Group) and 58 practising dental hygienists (Experimental Group). Participants were tasked with identifying 40 extracted teeth, with errors categorised into three levels of severity: Type 1 (Side/Group Misplacement), Type 2 (Incorrect Jaw Identification) and Type 3 (Misidentification of the Main Tooth Group). For the practising hygienists, the relationship between years of professional experience and identification errors was analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed that dental hygienists had a significantly lower correct identification rate compared to students (p < 0.001). Among the hygienists, 40 (68.96%) made 10 or more errors, and 32 (55.17%) failed the test by exceeding 12 errors. On average, this group made 18.93 errors, with Types 2 and 3 errors accounting for 71.95% of all mistakes. A significant increase in errors was observed with more years of experience (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate a positive correlation between identification errors and clinical experience among hygienists, suggesting a decline in long-term retention of foundational knowledge. Maintaining essential competencies requires ongoing reinforcement beyond initial learning. Integrating tooth morphology into continuing education programmes could help address these gaps, improve retention and enhance professional performance over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Dental hygienists play an essential role in promoting oral health and preventing oral diseases. A strong foundation in tooth morphology is critical for effective dental hygiene practise. This study aims to evaluate and compare tooth morphology knowledge among undergraduate dental hygiene students and practising dental hygienists.
Materials and methods: A Tooth Identification Examination was conducted with 54 first-year dental hygiene students (Control Group) and 58 practising dental hygienists (Experimental Group). Participants were tasked with identifying 40 extracted teeth, with errors categorised into three levels of severity: Type 1 (Side/Group Misplacement), Type 2 (Incorrect Jaw Identification) and Type 3 (Misidentification of the Main Tooth Group). For the practising hygienists, the relationship between years of professional experience and identification errors was analysed.
Results: Results revealed that dental hygienists had a significantly lower correct identification rate compared to students (p < 0.001). Among the hygienists, 40 (68.96%) made 10 or more errors, and 32 (55.17%) failed the test by exceeding 12 errors. On average, this group made 18.93 errors, with Types 2 and 3 errors accounting for 71.95% of all mistakes. A significant increase in errors was observed with more years of experience (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: These findings demonstrate a positive correlation between identification errors and clinical experience among hygienists, suggesting a decline in long-term retention of foundational knowledge. Maintaining essential competencies requires ongoing reinforcement beyond initial learning. Integrating tooth morphology into continuing education programmes could help address these gaps, improve retention and enhance professional performance over time.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the European Journal of Dental Education is to publish original topical and review articles of the highest quality in the field of Dental Education. The Journal seeks to disseminate widely the latest information on curriculum development teaching methodologies assessment techniques and quality assurance in the fields of dental undergraduate and postgraduate education and dental auxiliary personnel training. The scope includes the dental educational aspects of the basic medical sciences the behavioural sciences the interface with medical education information technology and distance learning and educational audit. Papers embodying the results of high-quality educational research of relevance to dentistry are particularly encouraged as are evidence-based reports of novel and established educational programmes and their outcomes.