Users' Perceptions of Access to and Quality of Public Health Services in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study in Metropolitan Rio de Janeiro, Including Pharmaceutical Services.

3区 综合性期刊
Mariana Crespo Raimundo, Edna Afonso Reis, Igor Fradique Leandro Ferraz, Carlos Podalirio Borges de Almeida, Brian Godman, Stephen M Campbell, Johanna C Meyer, Isabella Piassi Dias Godói
{"title":"Users' Perceptions of Access to and Quality of Public Health Services in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study in Metropolitan Rio de Janeiro, Including Pharmaceutical Services.","authors":"Mariana Crespo Raimundo, Edna Afonso Reis, Igor Fradique Leandro Ferraz, Carlos Podalirio Borges de Almeida, Brian Godman, Stephen M Campbell, Johanna C Meyer, Isabella Piassi Dias Godói","doi":"10.3390/ijerph22060967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluates one of the five regions of the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, as part of a broader research project examining users' perceptions of the Unified Health System (SUS), which has already generated publications in previous phases. The aim was to assess users' perceptions of the SUS regarding access to and the quality of public health services, including pharmaceutical services, in the Metropolitan Region of Rio de Janeiro State.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted between January and August 2024 with 200 participants, using a 66-item survey addressing access to and the quality of SUS services, appointment scheduling, medication acquisition, and the pharmacist's role. Associations between variables were investigated using the Pearson Chi-Square Test in R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Frequent SUS users rated access as very good/good (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and overall quality as very good/good (<i>p</i> = 0.045). Reported challenges included the need for improved infrastructure (48.5%), better professional qualifications (30.6%), and easier access to medicines (16.8%). Higher ratings were given by those who used the SUS more frequently, and, in general, there was a tendency for participants with lower socioeconomic conditions to provide more favorable assessments of access to public health services (<i>p</i> = 0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A universal health system should cover diverse regions with unique needs. However, 49.4% of participants stated they never received information on how to store their medicines, and 42.3% reported never encountering a pharmacist in public pharmacies. Further ongoing studies assessing user perceptions are essential to ensure users play a central role in health decision-making, contributing to the system's strengthening and improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"22 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12193424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060967","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates one of the five regions of the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, as part of a broader research project examining users' perceptions of the Unified Health System (SUS), which has already generated publications in previous phases. The aim was to assess users' perceptions of the SUS regarding access to and the quality of public health services, including pharmaceutical services, in the Metropolitan Region of Rio de Janeiro State.

Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted between January and August 2024 with 200 participants, using a 66-item survey addressing access to and the quality of SUS services, appointment scheduling, medication acquisition, and the pharmacist's role. Associations between variables were investigated using the Pearson Chi-Square Test in R software.

Results: Frequent SUS users rated access as very good/good (p = 0.002) and overall quality as very good/good (p = 0.045). Reported challenges included the need for improved infrastructure (48.5%), better professional qualifications (30.6%), and easier access to medicines (16.8%). Higher ratings were given by those who used the SUS more frequently, and, in general, there was a tendency for participants with lower socioeconomic conditions to provide more favorable assessments of access to public health services (p = 0.024).

Conclusions: A universal health system should cover diverse regions with unique needs. However, 49.4% of participants stated they never received information on how to store their medicines, and 42.3% reported never encountering a pharmacist in public pharmacies. Further ongoing studies assessing user perceptions are essential to ensure users play a central role in health decision-making, contributing to the system's strengthening and improvement.

巴西用户对公共卫生服务可及性和质量的看法:在里约热内卢大都市(包括医药服务)进行的横断面研究。
背景:本研究评估了巴西巴西里约热内卢州的五个地区之一,作为一个更广泛的研究项目的一部分,该研究项目调查了用户对统一卫生系统(SUS)的看法,该项目已经在前几个阶段发表了出版物。目的是评估用户对单一保健系统在巴西里约热内卢州大都市区获得公共保健服务(包括药品服务)及其质量的看法。方法:在2024年1月至8月期间,对200名参与者进行了一项横断面研究,采用66项调查,涉及SUS服务的获取和质量、预约安排、药物获取和药剂师的角色。使用R软件中的皮尔逊卡方检验调查变量之间的关联。结果:频繁使用SUS的用户将访问评为非常好/好(p = 0.002),整体质量为非常好/好(p = 0.045)。报告的挑战包括需要改善基础设施(48.5%)、提高专业资格(30.6%)和更容易获得药品(16.8%)。经常使用单一系统的人评分较高,总体而言,社会经济条件较低的参与者倾向于对获得公共卫生服务的机会提供更有利的评估(p = 0.024)。结论:全民卫生系统应覆盖具有独特需求的不同地区。然而,49.4%的参与者表示他们从未收到有关如何储存药物的信息,42.3%的参与者表示从未在公共药房遇到药剂师。为了确保用户在卫生决策中发挥核心作用,促进该系统的加强和改进,评估用户看法的进一步正在进行的研究至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信