Non-conventional diagnostic tools for lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction in men: a perspective review.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Minore Antonio, Cacciatore Loris, Secco Silvia, Gacci Mauro, Thomas R W Herrmann, De Nunzio Cosimo, Kuang Wayne, Cornu Jean Nicolas, Cindolo Luca
{"title":"Non-conventional diagnostic tools for lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction in men: a perspective review.","authors":"Minore Antonio, Cacciatore Loris, Secco Silvia, Gacci Mauro, Thomas R W Herrmann, De Nunzio Cosimo, Kuang Wayne, Cornu Jean Nicolas, Cindolo Luca","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05777-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Assessing male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to Benign outlet obstruction (BOO) remains a challenge in urology due to the limitations of conventional diagnostic methods, which are often invasive, time-consuming, and inefficient. Objective Given these limitations, this review explores emerging non-conventional diagnostic approaches for evaluating benign male LUTS. Methods: A broad literature search was performed in November 2024 regarding the assessment of male LUTS exploiting tools different than UDS. The search strategy was implemented across Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science.Results Ultrasonography, along with surrogate diagnostic methods such as detrusor wall thickness and intravesical prostatic protrusion, remains a key tool in the outpatient setting. Additionally, alternative methods, including near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), condom catheter testing, and penile cuff pressure analysis, are being investigated with the latter, showing potential as a non-invasive alternative to urodynamics, pending further future validations. Biomarkers, such as PSA, adiponectin, neural growth factor and miRNA are gaining interest in the scientific community as additional diagnostic frameworks to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, advancements in computational modeling and artificial intelligence (AI) are poised to revolutionize LUTS diagnostics. Computational modeling, though still in its early stages, offers valuable insights into anatomical and flow dynamics, providing objective parameters for assessing obstruction severity and the need for surgical intervention. Although it has not yet integrated in the current clinical practice, AI, in particular, may offer the potential to integrate diverse data sources, including diagnostic tests and patient-reported symptoms, to create more reliable predictive models for bladder outlet obstruction. Conclusion Given the rapid development and the large economic interest of machine learning, it is expected to play a pivotal role in the future of LUTS assessment, offering faster and more accurate diagnostic tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"395"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05777-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Assessing male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to Benign outlet obstruction (BOO) remains a challenge in urology due to the limitations of conventional diagnostic methods, which are often invasive, time-consuming, and inefficient. Objective Given these limitations, this review explores emerging non-conventional diagnostic approaches for evaluating benign male LUTS. Methods: A broad literature search was performed in November 2024 regarding the assessment of male LUTS exploiting tools different than UDS. The search strategy was implemented across Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science.Results Ultrasonography, along with surrogate diagnostic methods such as detrusor wall thickness and intravesical prostatic protrusion, remains a key tool in the outpatient setting. Additionally, alternative methods, including near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), condom catheter testing, and penile cuff pressure analysis, are being investigated with the latter, showing potential as a non-invasive alternative to urodynamics, pending further future validations. Biomarkers, such as PSA, adiponectin, neural growth factor and miRNA are gaining interest in the scientific community as additional diagnostic frameworks to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, advancements in computational modeling and artificial intelligence (AI) are poised to revolutionize LUTS diagnostics. Computational modeling, though still in its early stages, offers valuable insights into anatomical and flow dynamics, providing objective parameters for assessing obstruction severity and the need for surgical intervention. Although it has not yet integrated in the current clinical practice, AI, in particular, may offer the potential to integrate diverse data sources, including diagnostic tests and patient-reported symptoms, to create more reliable predictive models for bladder outlet obstruction. Conclusion Given the rapid development and the large economic interest of machine learning, it is expected to play a pivotal role in the future of LUTS assessment, offering faster and more accurate diagnostic tools.

男性下尿路症状和膀胱出口梗阻的非常规诊断工具:综述
由于传统诊断方法的局限性,评估男性良性出口梗阻(BOO)引起的下尿路症状(LUTS)仍然是泌尿外科的一个挑战,这些诊断方法通常是侵入性的、耗时的和低效的。目的考虑到这些局限性,本综述探讨了评估良性男性LUTS的新兴非传统诊断方法。方法:于2024年11月对男性LUTS利用不同UDS的工具进行了广泛的文献检索。该搜索策略在Scopus、PubMed和Web of Science中实现。结果超声检查与逼尿肌壁厚度、膀胱内前列腺突出等替代诊断方法仍然是门诊诊断的关键工具。此外,包括近红外光谱(NIRS)、避孕套导管测试和阴茎袖带压力分析在内的替代方法正在研究中,后者显示出作为尿动力学非侵入性替代方法的潜力,有待进一步的验证。生物标志物,如PSA、脂联素、神经生长因子和miRNA,作为提高诊断准确性的附加诊断框架,越来越受到科学界的关注。此外,计算建模和人工智能(AI)的进步有望彻底改变LUTS诊断。虽然计算模型仍处于早期阶段,但它为解剖学和血流动力学提供了有价值的见解,为评估阻塞严重程度和手术干预的需要提供了客观参数。尽管人工智能尚未融入目前的临床实践,但它尤其可能提供整合各种数据源的潜力,包括诊断测试和患者报告的症状,以创建更可靠的膀胱出口梗阻预测模型。鉴于机器学习的快速发展和巨大的经济利益,它有望在未来的LUTS评估中发挥关键作用,提供更快、更准确的诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信