Large-Core Paradox.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Adrien Ter Schiphorst, Pierre Seners, Caroline Arquizan, Vivek Yedavalli, Jean-Marc Olivot, Maarten G Lansberg, Keith W Muir, Mark W Parsons, Jeffrey L Saver, Marc Fisher, Gregory W Albers, Vincent Costalat, Jean-Claude Baron
{"title":"Large-Core Paradox.","authors":"Adrien Ter Schiphorst, Pierre Seners, Caroline Arquizan, Vivek Yedavalli, Jean-Marc Olivot, Maarten G Lansberg, Keith W Muir, Mark W Parsons, Jeffrey L Saver, Marc Fisher, Gregory W Albers, Vincent Costalat, Jean-Claude Baron","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.050397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, 6 randomized controlled trials of endovascular treatment (EVT) versus medical management in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion with large-core documented significant benefit of EVT on functional outcome. Moreover, one trial reported the benefit of EVT in the large-core category (Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score, 0-2). These results are considered paradoxical by some as they contradict the prevailing view that the presence of a large core precludes the possibility of good outcomes following reperfusion. They, in turn, led some investigators to question the applicability of the core/penumbra model in the case of large-core stroke and even its overall validity, specifically regarding the notion that the core reliably predicts tissue infarction. Here, we discuss the trial results and propose alternative explanations for the large-core paradox. First, although EVT does improve outcomes as compared with medical management, overall outcomes remain poor in ≈80% of the treated population. Second, the assessment of core extent on imaging, particularly with computed tomography, is potentially inaccurate, especially in the early time window. Third, consistent with observational studies, some randomized controlled trial substudies suggest that the benefit of EVT in this population derives at least in part from the salvage of penumbra, which appears to have been present in a large percentage of enrolled patients. Fourth, the markedly reduced perfusion that prevails within large cores facilitates the early development of vasogenic edema. This heterogeneity of tissue injury may, in turn, lead to an overestimation of true core/neuronal death as estimated with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Assessing patients with apparent large core should consider these notions when discussing eligibility for EVT. Early reperfusion of large-core patients is expected to both target any residual penumbra and prevent the development of vasogenic edema within the severely hypoperfused areas. These considerations underscore the need for more reliable methods to identify irreversible neuronal injury inside the imaging-based estimated core.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.050397","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, 6 randomized controlled trials of endovascular treatment (EVT) versus medical management in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion with large-core documented significant benefit of EVT on functional outcome. Moreover, one trial reported the benefit of EVT in the large-core category (Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score, 0-2). These results are considered paradoxical by some as they contradict the prevailing view that the presence of a large core precludes the possibility of good outcomes following reperfusion. They, in turn, led some investigators to question the applicability of the core/penumbra model in the case of large-core stroke and even its overall validity, specifically regarding the notion that the core reliably predicts tissue infarction. Here, we discuss the trial results and propose alternative explanations for the large-core paradox. First, although EVT does improve outcomes as compared with medical management, overall outcomes remain poor in ≈80% of the treated population. Second, the assessment of core extent on imaging, particularly with computed tomography, is potentially inaccurate, especially in the early time window. Third, consistent with observational studies, some randomized controlled trial substudies suggest that the benefit of EVT in this population derives at least in part from the salvage of penumbra, which appears to have been present in a large percentage of enrolled patients. Fourth, the markedly reduced perfusion that prevails within large cores facilitates the early development of vasogenic edema. This heterogeneity of tissue injury may, in turn, lead to an overestimation of true core/neuronal death as estimated with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Assessing patients with apparent large core should consider these notions when discussing eligibility for EVT. Early reperfusion of large-core patients is expected to both target any residual penumbra and prevent the development of vasogenic edema within the severely hypoperfused areas. These considerations underscore the need for more reliable methods to identify irreversible neuronal injury inside the imaging-based estimated core.

大批核心矛盾。
最近,6项血管内治疗(EVT)与药物治疗前循环大血管闭塞的随机对照试验表明,EVT对功能结局有显著的益处。此外,一项试验报告了EVT在大核心类别中的益处(阿尔伯塔卒中计划早期计算机断层扫描评分,0-2)。这些结果被一些人认为是矛盾的,因为它们与主流观点相矛盾,即大核心的存在排除了再灌注后良好结果的可能性。反过来,他们又导致一些研究人员质疑核心/半影模型在大核心中风病例中的适用性,甚至质疑其整体有效性,特别是关于核心可靠地预测组织梗死的概念。在这里,我们讨论了试验结果,并对大核悖论提出了不同的解释。首先,尽管与医疗管理相比,EVT确实改善了预后,但在约80%的治疗人群中,总体预后仍然很差。其次,影像学评估核心范围,特别是计算机断层扫描,可能是不准确的,特别是在早期的时间窗口。第三,与观察性研究一致,一些随机对照试验亚研究表明,EVT在这一人群中的益处至少部分来自半影的挽救,这似乎在很大比例的入组患者中都存在。第四,大心脏内普遍存在的灌注明显减少,促进了血管源性水肿的早期发展。这种组织损伤的异质性可能反过来导致高估计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像估计的真正核心/神经元死亡。在讨论EVT的资格时,评估明显较大核心的患者应考虑这些概念。大核患者的早期再灌注既可针对任何残余半暗带,又可防止严重低灌注区域内血管源性水肿的发生。这些考虑强调需要更可靠的方法来识别基于成像的估计核心内的不可逆神经元损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信