Low adherence to cardiovascular risk assessment guidelines in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective chart review of routine clinical practice.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Louise Murphy, Grainne Murphy, Nicola Cornally, Sheena McHugh, Mohamad M Saab, Patrick Cotter
{"title":"Low adherence to cardiovascular risk assessment guidelines in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective chart review of routine clinical practice.","authors":"Louise Murphy, Grainne Murphy, Nicola Cornally, Sheena McHugh, Mohamad M Saab, Patrick Cotter","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05916-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an elevated risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Despite European guidelines recommending routine CVD risk assessment, implementation in clinical practice is challenging. The objectives of this review were to determine if patients attending an Irish tertiary rheumatology centre received CVD risk assessments in line with European guidelines and assess the extent of CVD risk factor screening over five years of routine rheumatology care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients newly diagnosed with RA in 2018, with five-year follow-up. Data were extracted to determine if CVD risk assessments were performed, and where absent, risk was retrospectively calculated. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement checklist for cohort studies was used to guide the reporting of this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 21 patients, no documented CVD risk assessments were identified. CVD risk factor screening was consistently insufficient. There was a lack of documented clinical data necessary to conduct a CVD risk assessment on more than half of patients at study entry, and one quarter of patients at five-year follow up. Of those with data available (n = 10), retrospective calculations showed 80% had an undetected moderate or higher CVD risk at diagnosis. There was no documented referral to primary care for CVD risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of CVD risk management guidelines in the routine care of patients with RA is challenging. The interpretation and operationalisation of guideline recommendations by rheumatology healthcare professionals in relation to implementation barriers needs to be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 7","pages":"158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05916-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an elevated risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Despite European guidelines recommending routine CVD risk assessment, implementation in clinical practice is challenging. The objectives of this review were to determine if patients attending an Irish tertiary rheumatology centre received CVD risk assessments in line with European guidelines and assess the extent of CVD risk factor screening over five years of routine rheumatology care.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients newly diagnosed with RA in 2018, with five-year follow-up. Data were extracted to determine if CVD risk assessments were performed, and where absent, risk was retrospectively calculated. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement checklist for cohort studies was used to guide the reporting of this study.

Results: Among 21 patients, no documented CVD risk assessments were identified. CVD risk factor screening was consistently insufficient. There was a lack of documented clinical data necessary to conduct a CVD risk assessment on more than half of patients at study entry, and one quarter of patients at five-year follow up. Of those with data available (n = 10), retrospective calculations showed 80% had an undetected moderate or higher CVD risk at diagnosis. There was no documented referral to primary care for CVD risk assessment.

Conclusion: Implementation of CVD risk management guidelines in the routine care of patients with RA is challenging. The interpretation and operationalisation of guideline recommendations by rheumatology healthcare professionals in relation to implementation barriers needs to be explored.

类风湿性关节炎患者对心血管风险评估指南的依从性低:常规临床实践的回顾性图表回顾
类风湿关节炎(RA)患者发生心血管疾病(CVD)的风险增高。尽管欧洲指南推荐常规心血管疾病风险评估,但在临床实践中的实施是具有挑战性的。本综述的目的是确定在爱尔兰三级风湿病中心就诊的患者是否接受了符合欧洲指南的心血管疾病风险评估,并评估5年常规风湿病护理中心血管疾病风险因素筛查的程度。方法:对2018年新诊断的RA患者进行回顾性图表回顾,随访5年。提取数据以确定是否进行了心血管疾病风险评估,如果没有进行评估,则回顾性计算风险。采用加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)队列研究声明清单指导本研究的报告。结果:在21例患者中,未发现记录在案的心血管疾病风险评估。心血管疾病危险因素筛查一直不充分。在研究开始时,有超过一半的患者和四分之一的患者缺乏必要的临床资料来进行心血管疾病风险评估。在有资料的患者中(n = 10),回顾性计算显示,80%的患者在诊断时未发现中度或更高的心血管疾病风险。没有关于心血管疾病风险评估的初级保健转诊记录。结论:在RA患者的常规护理中实施心血管疾病风险管理指南具有挑战性。风湿病卫生保健专业人员对指南建议的解释和操作需要探讨实施障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信