Validating self-administration as an agile modality for high-frequency diet quality data collection.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0317611
Rhys Manners, Anna W Herforth, Maria Delfine, Rosil Hesen, Didier Nkubito, Karin Borgonjen-van den Berg, Eric Matsiko, Marguerite Niyibituronsa, Betül T M Uyar, Elise F Talsma
{"title":"Validating self-administration as an agile modality for high-frequency diet quality data collection.","authors":"Rhys Manners, Anna W Herforth, Maria Delfine, Rosil Hesen, Didier Nkubito, Karin Borgonjen-van den Berg, Eric Matsiko, Marguerite Niyibituronsa, Betül T M Uyar, Elise F Talsma","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0317611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data collection of diet quality is important to estimate global dietary transitions affecting public health. Mobile-phone based tools can provide a low-cost and rapidly deployable modality to complement enumerator-collected data. This study validated self-administration of the Diet Quality Questionnaire using mobile phones, comparing accuracy against enumerator administration, measuring both against an observed benchmark. Quantitative dietary intake data were gathered from 308 participants in northwest Rwanda, using a weighed food record. Intake data were used to calculated 'observed' responses to the questionnaire, half the participants responding to enumerators, and the other half using a mobile-administered version of the questionnaire. After filtering for low quality data, agreement in observed and reported responses, for all questionnaire questions, were statistically compared. Agreement rates (observed-reported) of self-administered and enumerated responses were high (91% vs 95%, p = 0.05), respectively. Agreement was significantly lower for the mobile-administered modality among older and lower income respondents (by about 5 percentage points), with no significant differences by gender or time of response. Mobile-administration cost approximately USD 0.70 per response, versus the marginal cost of USD 0.79 for the enumerator-administered. Our results confirm self-administered reporting by mobile-phone as a valid, low-cost method for collecting dietary data, with only marginal (yet significant for some subgroups) differences in agreement rates, compared to enumerated data. Data collection by mobile phone represents an agile complement to enumerated collection, administrable in the absence of existing survey platforms; and provides a useful option for high-frequency data collection to monitor dietary dynamics in target sub-populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0317611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12193772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317611","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data collection of diet quality is important to estimate global dietary transitions affecting public health. Mobile-phone based tools can provide a low-cost and rapidly deployable modality to complement enumerator-collected data. This study validated self-administration of the Diet Quality Questionnaire using mobile phones, comparing accuracy against enumerator administration, measuring both against an observed benchmark. Quantitative dietary intake data were gathered from 308 participants in northwest Rwanda, using a weighed food record. Intake data were used to calculated 'observed' responses to the questionnaire, half the participants responding to enumerators, and the other half using a mobile-administered version of the questionnaire. After filtering for low quality data, agreement in observed and reported responses, for all questionnaire questions, were statistically compared. Agreement rates (observed-reported) of self-administered and enumerated responses were high (91% vs 95%, p = 0.05), respectively. Agreement was significantly lower for the mobile-administered modality among older and lower income respondents (by about 5 percentage points), with no significant differences by gender or time of response. Mobile-administration cost approximately USD 0.70 per response, versus the marginal cost of USD 0.79 for the enumerator-administered. Our results confirm self-administered reporting by mobile-phone as a valid, low-cost method for collecting dietary data, with only marginal (yet significant for some subgroups) differences in agreement rates, compared to enumerated data. Data collection by mobile phone represents an agile complement to enumerated collection, administrable in the absence of existing survey platforms; and provides a useful option for high-frequency data collection to monitor dietary dynamics in target sub-populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

验证自我管理作为高频饮食质量数据收集的敏捷模式。
收集饮食质量数据对于估计影响公共卫生的全球饮食转变具有重要意义。基于移动电话的工具可以提供一种低成本和快速部署的方式,以补充计数员收集的数据。本研究验证了使用手机的饮食质量问卷的自我管理,将准确性与计数人员管理进行比较,并根据观察到的基准进行测量。定量饮食摄入数据来自卢旺达西北部的308名参与者,使用称重食物记录。摄入数据用于计算“观察到的”对问卷的回答,一半的参与者回答枚举员,另一半使用移动管理版本的问卷。在过滤掉低质量的数据后,对所有问卷问题,对观察到的和报告的回答的一致性进行统计比较。自我给药反应和枚举反应的符合率(观察-报告)较高(分别为91%对95%,p = 0.05)。老年人和低收入受访者对移动管理模式的认同程度明显较低(约5个百分点),性别或回应时间没有显著差异。每次响应的移动管理成本约为0.70美元,而普查人员管理的边际成本为0.79美元。我们的研究结果证实,手机自我报告是一种有效的、低成本的饮食数据收集方法,与枚举数据相比,一致性只有边际差异(但在某些亚组中很重要)。通过移动电话收集数据是对枚举收集的一种灵活补充,在没有现有调查平台的情况下可以管理;并为监测目标亚群的饮食动态提供了高频数据收集的有用选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信