Impact of feeding strategies on the welfare and behaviour of horses in groups: An experimental study.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0325928
Marie Roig-Pons, Iris Bachmann, Sabrina Briefer Freymond
{"title":"Impact of feeding strategies on the welfare and behaviour of horses in groups: An experimental study.","authors":"Marie Roig-Pons, Iris Bachmann, Sabrina Briefer Freymond","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0325928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Finding feeding strategies that meet horses' needs without compromising health is essential for optimising welfare, particularly in group housing, where limited hay availability increases aggression and injury risks. Recently, two strategies have emerged: portioning daily intake into smaller, frequent meals using time-controlled hay racks, or slowing intake with \"slow-feeders.\" However, the effects of such management practices on horse behaviour remain underexplored. We conducted a cross-over study with 18 mares divided into four groups to compare three feeding strategies: \"traditional\" (3 of 2-hours meals during daylight, TD), \"portioned\" (6 of 1-hour meals spread over 24h, PO) and \"slow-feeding\" (ad libitum hay covered by a net, SF). Each treatment included 3 weeks of habituation and 2 weeks of data collection. We continuously recorded social interactions for 15 hours and noted the position and activity of all horses every 15 minutes. We also recorded injuries periodically and measured the lying behaviour using accelerometers. We analysed the effects of treatment on agonistic and affiliative behaviour within groups using generalised mixed model and selected the best model using AIC. We used the same procedure for the injuries and lying behaviour at the individual level. Horses in SF exhibited activity time budgets resembling natural conditions, while TD and PO resulted in time budgets similar to box-stall systems, despite the loose-housing system. Surprisingly, our results suggest that PO may be more frustrating for the horses than TD. Indeed, there was no significant reduction of agonistic behaviours during feeding times in PO compared to TD and lying behaviour tended to be impaired in PO (-11.3 min/day, 95% CI [-25.8; 3.1]) compared to SF and TD (37.5 min/day on average). In our study, portioning into smaller, more frequent meals did not reduce the stress in horses. This highlights the need for further research on portioning strategies to find optimal feeding management. In addition, slow-feeding was a more suitable feeding strategy for horses than portioning. However, more research is required to substantiate the initial findings on the efficacy of ad libitum slow-feeding on the horse's health and behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0325928"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12193674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Finding feeding strategies that meet horses' needs without compromising health is essential for optimising welfare, particularly in group housing, where limited hay availability increases aggression and injury risks. Recently, two strategies have emerged: portioning daily intake into smaller, frequent meals using time-controlled hay racks, or slowing intake with "slow-feeders." However, the effects of such management practices on horse behaviour remain underexplored. We conducted a cross-over study with 18 mares divided into four groups to compare three feeding strategies: "traditional" (3 of 2-hours meals during daylight, TD), "portioned" (6 of 1-hour meals spread over 24h, PO) and "slow-feeding" (ad libitum hay covered by a net, SF). Each treatment included 3 weeks of habituation and 2 weeks of data collection. We continuously recorded social interactions for 15 hours and noted the position and activity of all horses every 15 minutes. We also recorded injuries periodically and measured the lying behaviour using accelerometers. We analysed the effects of treatment on agonistic and affiliative behaviour within groups using generalised mixed model and selected the best model using AIC. We used the same procedure for the injuries and lying behaviour at the individual level. Horses in SF exhibited activity time budgets resembling natural conditions, while TD and PO resulted in time budgets similar to box-stall systems, despite the loose-housing system. Surprisingly, our results suggest that PO may be more frustrating for the horses than TD. Indeed, there was no significant reduction of agonistic behaviours during feeding times in PO compared to TD and lying behaviour tended to be impaired in PO (-11.3 min/day, 95% CI [-25.8; 3.1]) compared to SF and TD (37.5 min/day on average). In our study, portioning into smaller, more frequent meals did not reduce the stress in horses. This highlights the need for further research on portioning strategies to find optimal feeding management. In addition, slow-feeding was a more suitable feeding strategy for horses than portioning. However, more research is required to substantiate the initial findings on the efficacy of ad libitum slow-feeding on the horse's health and behaviour.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

饲养策略对群体马福利和行为的影响:一项实验研究。
寻找既满足马的需求又不损害健康的喂养策略对于优化福利至关重要,特别是在群体住房中,有限的干草供应增加了攻击和伤害风险。最近出现了两种策略:使用时间控制的干草架将每日摄入量分成较小的,频繁的膳食,或者使用“慢食者”来减缓摄入量。然而,这种管理实践对马行为的影响仍未得到充分探讨。我们进行了一项交叉研究,将18匹母马分为四组,比较了三种喂养策略:“传统”(白天2小时三餐中的3次,TD),“分配”(1小时三餐中的6次,分布在24小时内,PO)和“慢喂”(用网覆盖的随意干草,SF)。每次治疗包括3周的习惯训练和2周的数据收集。我们连续记录15小时的社会互动,每15分钟记录一次所有马的位置和活动。我们还定期记录受伤情况,并使用加速度计测量说谎行为。我们使用广义混合模型分析了治疗对群体内的激动和依恋行为的影响,并使用AIC选择了最佳模型。在个人层面上,我们对伤病和说谎行为使用了同样的程序。SF中的马表现出类似于自然条件的活动时间预算,而TD和PO的时间预算类似于箱位系统,尽管是松散的住房系统。令人惊讶的是,我们的结果表明,对于马来说,PO可能比TD更令人沮丧。事实上,与TD相比,在喂食时间内,PO组的激动行为没有显著减少,并且PO组的躺卧行为倾向于受损(-11.3分钟/天,95% CI [-25.8;3.1]),而SF和TD(平均37.5分钟/天)。在我们的研究中,少食多餐并不能减轻马的压力。这表明需要进一步研究分配策略,以找到最佳的喂养管理。此外,慢食比分食更适合马的喂养策略。然而,需要更多的研究来证实随意慢食对马的健康和行为的功效的初步发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信