{"title":"Association between body mass index and long-term all-cause mortality in critically ill patients without malignant tumors.","authors":"Jian Deng, Linyan Zhao","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0325452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The \"obesity paradox\" in certain diseases has been reported in previous studies. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between BMI and long-term mortality in all critically ill patients without malignant tumors who were admitted to the ICU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the MIMIC-IV 2.2 database, we included all ICU admissions for patients without malignant tumors and categorized them into four groups based on the World Health Organization (WHO) obesity criteria. The relationship between BMI and 90-day, 180-day, and 1-year mortality was analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models, along with restricted cubic spline (RCS) models to account for potential non-linear associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19,089 patients were included, with 90-day, 180-day, and 1-year mortality rates of 18.35%, 20.80%, and 23.96%, respectively. Overweight and obese patients exhibited significantly lower mortality rates compared to underweight and normal-weight individuals at all time points. After adjusting for confounders, higher BMI remained a protective factor for long-term mortality (HR 0.65-0.72, P < 0.001). RCS curves demonstrated a U-shaped relationship between BMI and mortality, and subgroup analyses confirmed the protective effect of higher BMI in different subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The \"obesity paradox\" may apply to critically ill patients without malignant tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0325452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12193744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325452","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The "obesity paradox" in certain diseases has been reported in previous studies. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between BMI and long-term mortality in all critically ill patients without malignant tumors who were admitted to the ICU.
Methods: Using the MIMIC-IV 2.2 database, we included all ICU admissions for patients without malignant tumors and categorized them into four groups based on the World Health Organization (WHO) obesity criteria. The relationship between BMI and 90-day, 180-day, and 1-year mortality was analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models, along with restricted cubic spline (RCS) models to account for potential non-linear associations.
Results: A total of 19,089 patients were included, with 90-day, 180-day, and 1-year mortality rates of 18.35%, 20.80%, and 23.96%, respectively. Overweight and obese patients exhibited significantly lower mortality rates compared to underweight and normal-weight individuals at all time points. After adjusting for confounders, higher BMI remained a protective factor for long-term mortality (HR 0.65-0.72, P < 0.001). RCS curves demonstrated a U-shaped relationship between BMI and mortality, and subgroup analyses confirmed the protective effect of higher BMI in different subgroups.
Conclusion: The "obesity paradox" may apply to critically ill patients without malignant tumors.
期刊介绍:
PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides:
* Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright
* Fast publication times
* Peer review by expert, practicing researchers
* Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact
* Community-based dialogue on articles
* Worldwide media coverage